10/27/2026
When I have watched other paranormal investigations, whether they are live or prerecorded content creations, I have noted a few things that could destroy the credibility of the investigation, the results, and the information that impressionable watchers may absorb.
1. Equipment and cell phone effect on other equipment. In many cases these investigations are captured with cell phones, which are obviously connected to some sort of data source. Every time the cell phone receives or sends data, it will have an affect on the other equipment. Our team has documented that cell phones make REM Pods, K2 meters, cameras, digital voice recorders, and other devices blip or provide a false positive. Teams on these investigations in many cases don't address all of the electronics within 35 feet of them, let alone the area that they are in. Fire houses, hospitals, cell towers, and more can also make these devices go off in seemingly "paranormal ways." It is also important to remember that even on airplane mode cell phones can still impact an investigation. Not only cell phones, but other devices can have an impact just like them. Handheld cameras, 2-way radios, digital voice recorders, IR cameras, and more.
2. No debunking and/or no information on equipment set up. I often see these investigations start with just the view of where the equipment is and you don't see the people involved in the investigation. A lot of things can happen off camera that we aren't aware of that may have caused certain anomalies, this may be done on purpose or just oversight on the questions the more critical thinking viewer might have. Placement of equipment is a very important part of the reliability of the results and conclusion. Whether you are a paranormal investigator, content creator, or just an enthusiast watching these videos; please begin asking these questions. Who is there? What other equipment is there? Please show where that item is sitting to give us an idea of whether it was a natural event due to placement. Now I understand that this makes for less exciting content, but the reality is that in many cases the results can be explained 99.9% of the time. If all of our investigations were immediately fruitful like this, man, I'd be rich.
3. Misinterpreted response. So what of a piece of equipment providing a false positive? This means that a "positive" response to a question or statement is taken as a factual part of the case. Say that I ask if John Brown was in the location and I got a positive response. I may utilize that information to continue my line of questions and go out on a wild goose chase. Without proper debunking or corroborating equipment (showing that there are no external sources for the positive response), the results cannot be verified or supported. Imagine if you did a whole investigation and thought you were talking to a historically relevant spirit that ended up being just a cell phone someone forgot to turn off or an EM pulse from a fridge making it seem legitimate. I honestly wonder how many cases of this there are out there and whether people are creating their own Philip wherever they go.
4. Historical bias or inaccurate historical information. I once did an investigation where someone had watched a You Tube documentary about the location. The information was sensational and we found that there were no real historical documents to back it up. We discuss doing historical research on locations frequently, do we do it before or after the investigation? Either way you do it, make sure that you are finding legitimate sources for the information, not Zak Bagans or a You Tube video. 9/10 times the information was generated to get interest on a monetized channel, not to help educate others on factual information. It is VERY important that if you want to be taken seriously or have your data taken seriously, you do the proper research.
5. Too much happening. Not everyone can appreciate the value in small, structured investigations. 'The more the merrier!' Well, not in paranormal investigation. The more people you have the more contamination, and some people get really performative when the camera turns on (and not in a good way). Having a ton of people introduces additional variables and I am sure there is a statistic out there about at least one of that big group is a bad apple. We have had members that were frauds and we have had members who just loved to be disruptive (location representatives too). Basically 'The more the muddled!' Paranormal Investigation should be fun, but not at the expense of all of the people involved. Some people have fun but are serious about their field of study (like us). Imagine what it looks like to someone out there watching that is interested seriously and is looking to find a group that is just as serious. Kind of gives a bad taste of how people behave in this field.
All in all, a few procedures and protocols would make them more legitimate, but this post is more about those watching that think the surface level information being shared is enough to say "WOW! THERE'S GHOSTS!" If it was that easy we would have won the million dollars from James Randi and there wouldn't be skeptics. Critical thinking is important in paranormal investigation! And lastly, it's pretty much never a demon.
-Rebecca-