04/24/2026
Pulaski County Sues City of Sherwood Over Landers Road Firing
Range, Citing Jurisdiction and Permitting Compliance
Pulaski County has filed suit against the City of Sherwood seeking to stop operation of the outdoor firing range at the Landers Road facility. The County asserts the property is located in unincorporated Pulaski County and is subject to a 2025 ordinance requiring a conditional use permit prior to operating a new firing range. According to the filing, that permit was not obtained. The complaint also references a prior cease-and-desist notice and alleges recent use of the range.
This development marks a shift. What had been a public debate is now a legal matter. Questions of jurisdiction, authority, and compliance will be decided in court.
What the Filing Says
The County’s position is direct.
The property is outside Sherwood city limits.
A county ordinance requires a conditional use permit for a firing range.
The County alleges that process was not followed.
As a result, the County is asking the court to stop operation of the range until the issue is resolved through the proper legal and regulatory channels.
These are not political arguments. They are legal claims that will be tested through the judicial process.
What This Is Really About
This situation is not fundamentally about whether public safety facilities are needed. Most residents agree that police, fire, and public works should have the infrastructure required to do their jobs well.
The issue is process.
When a city undertakes a project outside its boundaries, particularly one that affects nearby residents and businesses, coordination with the governing jurisdiction is not optional. It is expected.
When that coordination breaks down, the outcome is predictable. The issue moves out of public meetings and into the courts.
A Breakdown in Leadership Communication
Over the past several weeks, one theme has been consistent. Residents have been asking questions. Many of those questions have focused on jurisdiction, process, and the impact on nearby communities.
At the same time, direct communication from elected leadership has been limited.
In situations involving public funds, intergovernmental conflict, and now active litigation, residents reasonably expect clear and direct communication from elected leadership. These are not operational questions. They are policy and governance matters.
Notably, the filing was not addressed in the City’s regular public update following its release. When a matter escalates to litigation between governmental entities, timely communication from elected leadership is not optional. It is expected.
When communication on those matters is unclear or deferred, the public conversation shifts elsewhere. That has been evident in this case.
The result is predictable. Questions remain unanswered, assumptions increase, and the issue ultimately moves out of public discussion and into the courts.
Being a Good Neighbor
The Landers Road facility is not located in isolation. It sits in proximity to homes, businesses, and the Brushy Island community, including an outdoor range located within close distance of residences and a daycare.
When a project of this nature is developed in one jurisdiction but impacts residents in another, being a good neighbor matters.
That includes:
Clear communication with nearby residents
Coordination with county leadership
Transparency around permitting and process
A willingness to address concerns directly
Being a good neighbor does not require agreement. It requires engagement.
Shared Responsibility
This situation does not fall on one office alone.
The mayor leads the administration.
The city council provides oversight and approves major decisions.
The city attorney advises on legal and jurisdictional matters.
Department leadership executes the project.
Pulaski County governs the area in which the property sits.
When all of those roles intersect, coordination is critical.
When coordination fails, litigation follows.
What Happens Next
The court will now determine whether the City of Sherwood was required to obtain a conditional use permit and whether the range can operate under current conditions.
That process will take time. It will also provide clarity.
Final Thought
This did not have to become a legal matter.
Clear communication, early coordination, and direct engagement with both county leadership and nearby residents often prevent situations like this from escalating.
Leadership is not tested when things are easy. It is tested when decisions are complex, visibility is high, and stakeholders disagree.
At this stage, clear communication from elected leadership is no longer helpful. It is necessary.
Court Documents
The full filing from Pulaski County is included below for those who want to review the source material directly.
https://caseinfo.arcourts.gov/opad/case/60CV-26-4839