06/06/2026
Greg Gardner writes in Lookout Eugene-Springfield: Recently, I drove past the site on Patterson Street where a University of Oregon doctoral student was hit by a vehicle and killed while riding his bicycle. The road was lined with signs urging drivers to slow down, and a white bicycle memorial stood as a stark reminder of what had happened.
Yet even as I drove the posted 25 miles per hour, multiple cars passed me at much higher speeds. The most troubling part was not that it happened, but that it felt entirely predictable. For anyone who has driven, biked or walked in Eugene, that scene is not surprising.
It is why the city must do more than repeat slogans about ending traffic deaths. It must pair its commitment with visible design changes and place traffic safety inside a broader, more compelling vision of a livable city.
Eugene’s own “Vision Zero” program describes itself as a data-driven effort to reduce deaths and serious injuries. Recent city reporting shows that fatal crashes remain a serious concern in spite of that commitment. Around the city, different street designs produce different outcomes.
Willamette Street, for example, with two-way traffic and a lower-speed feel, communicates caution. By contrast, multi-lane, one-way streets such as Patterson and Hilyard streets can communicate speed and uninterrupted flow.
Research on one-way to two-way conversions suggests that converting multi-lane, one-way streets can reduce speeds, improve conditions for people walking and biking, and in some cases decrease crashes while improving overall livability. That does not mean every corridor should be converted automatically, but it does mean the city should take a hard look at whether some of its one-way streets are functioning less like neighborhood streets and more like racetracks.
Supporters of safer streets sometimes get drawn into a familiar debate about personal responsibility. Of course driver behavior matters. Speeding, distraction, impairment and inattention all contribute to deadly outcomes. But behavior is also shaped by the environment.
Streets that feel wide, forgiving and optimized for fast movement invite people to drive faster, even when the posted speed limit says otherwise. That is why education campaigns and signage, while worthwhile, are not enough on their own. If the physical design of a street encourages risky behavior, then the city should not be surprised when risky behavior follows.
Enforcement plays an important role, but it is the weakest and most expensive layer of prevention when used as the primary strategy. Police officers, courts and fines depend on repeated intervention after unsafe behavior has already occurred. By contrast, better street design works continuously and at lower long-term cost.
The world’s most livable cities tend to perform well not only on safety, but also on infrastructure, transportation, education, health and the overall quality of daily life. Eugene does not need to copy Copenhagen or Vancouver, British Columbia, to learn from that pattern. It does, however, need a clearer civic ambition: to become a city where safer streets, better transit, walkability, bike access and thoughtful land use all work together.
Building that kind of future will require a long-term plan and a wider coalition. Business leaders, schools and universities, neighborhood groups, transportation staff, law enforcement, transit advocates, developers and residents all have a stake in how the city grows. Their perspectives will not always align, but that is exactly why the process must be intentional and public.
Eugene has a long history of civic engagement, and it should use that strength to build consensus around measurable goals, clear design priorities and transparent investment decisions. The city should continue its commitment to Vision Zero, but it should also make that commitment legible in the design of its streets and in a broader plan for livability. Memorials and warning signs should not be the clearest evidence that a street is dangerous. The clearest evidence should be that the city acted before the next tragedy, not after it.
------
Greg Gardner is native Oregonian who has spent most of his career in the public electric utility industry, moving to Eugene to work for Eugene Water & Electric Board, and then most recently as the general manager of Blachly-Lane Electric Co-op.
The city should continue its commitment to Vision Zero, but it should also make that commitment legible in the design of its streets and in a broader plan for livability.
