06/07/2026
đ¨ MACHO ROCKET WAS IN A HERD DISPERSAL ON MAY 26. DAYS LATER HE WAS IN A KILL PEN.
Read that again.
On May 26, 2026, Macho Rocket was publicly listed in the âDispersal of Thoroughbreds for Dan Rogersâ at North Platte Stockyards.
Days later, he was standing in the Stroud kill pen.
Not retired.
Not in sanctuary.
Not protected by a documented aftercare program.
In a kill pen.
And somehow Journey with Equus became the target of criticism for stepping in to save him.
As more information has surfaced, we believe the public deserves to see the timeline, the documented facts, and the actual statements that were made.
đ´ FACT #1: MACHO ROCKET WAS NOT AN UNKNOWN HORSE
Macho Rocket sold for $825,000.
He trained under Bob Baffert.
He won his only career start.
He entered a breeding career.
He spent years standing at Arkansas State Universityâs breeding program.
He was still breeding mares as recently as last year.
This was not an anonymous horse.
This was a horse with a documented history and known connections.
đ´ FACT #2: LINDA ROBBINS PUBLICLY CONNECTED MACHO ROCKET TO DAVE AND DAN ROGERS
In a public post from 2018, Linda Robbins wrote:
âCongratulations to Macho Rocketâs new owners, Dave and Dan Rogers. The Rogers brothers have been big supporters of this stallion and will leave him here at Starfish Stallions, Hot Springs, Arkansas for the 2018 breeding season.â
That statement publicly connects Macho Rocket to Dave and Dan Rogers.
It also establishes that Linda Robbins had knowledge of Macho Rocketâs ownership and breeding history.
đ´ FACT #3: MACHO ROCKET AND ROCKETS PHENOM WERE BOTH LISTED IN THE DAN ROGERS HERD DISPERSAL
On May 26, 2026, North Platte Stockyards advertised:
âDispersal of Thoroughbreds for Dan Rogers.â
Included in that dispersal were:
⢠Macho Rocket
⢠Rockets Phenom
Both horses were publicly listed as part of that dispersal.
The listing described Macho Rocket as:
âMacho Rocket Stallion-excellent breeder. Would be a great cross for speed on Quarter horse mares.â
Think about that.
A 17-year-old stallion.
A horse who had already raced.
A horse who had already spent years breeding.
A horse who had already produced offspring.
Was still being marketed as a breeding stallion.
At a time when rescues are full.
Sanctuaries are full.
Kill pens are full.
Yet somehow the answer was still to produce more horses.
đ´ FACT #4: ROCKETS PHENOM ALSO ENDED UP IN THE PIPELINE
Rockets Phenom was listed in the same dispersal.
She later appeared in the pipeline as well.
Thankfully she is reportedly safe.
But she still ended up there.
That means two horses connected to this story, both listed in the dispersal, both ended up needing intervention.
đ´ FACT #5: WE WERE TOLD THEY THOUGHT MACHO WAS STILL AT THE UNIVERSITY
During the rescue effort, a person communicating with Linda Robbins relayed the following statement:
âThat horse has had a very nice life and we all thought he was still at the University.â
That statement raises significant questions.
Because by May 26, 2026, Macho Rocket was publicly listed in the Dan Rogers dispersal sale.
Those facts are difficult to reconcile.
If Macho Rocket was publicly listed in the Dan Rogers dispersal, then he was clearly no longer standing at the university.
So when did he leave?
Who took possession of him?
Who was responsible for his future after that?
And if former connections were advocating on his behalf, how was it believed he was still at the university?
đ´ FACT #6: THE GOAL APPEARED TO BE GETTING HIM BACK
The same communication included the following statements:
âA past owner got wind of this and called Linda to find out how to get him out.â
and
âIf they pay they want him back.â
Read that carefully.
Not:
âHow can we help with his future care?â
Not:
âHow can we help support the rescue?â
Not:
âHow can we ensure he never ends up in this situation again?â
The statement relayed was:
âIf they pay they want him back.â
By that point, Macho Rocket had already been through a dispersal sale and had already entered the pipeline.
Journey with Equus had to ask a simple question:
What protections existed to ensure history would not repeat itself?
That question was never answered.
đ´ FACT #7: THE RESCUE WAS PUBLICLY ATTACKED
While supporters were donating to save Macho Rocket, Linda Robbins publicly commented on and shared our fundraising posts.
Among the statements made:
âNo need for ransom.â
âIs this another ransom scam?â
âHis first owner is trying to save him if we can ever get a call back from Stroud. No ransom add ons necessary.â
âPitiful way to profit off good hearted folk.â
Chelsea Dyer added:
âSadly a rescue begging online for money to secure a horse will fight anyone for a horseâŚeven the first owner. Sorry to see that the rescue is not working with the original owner.â
These comments were made publicly while supporters were actively donating to save a horse standing in a kill pen.
đ´ FACT #8: WHAT DID NOT HAPPEN
No private phone call.
No email.
No professional outreach.
No questions about our facility.
No questions about our plans for Macho Rocket.
No questions about his future.
No questions about the life he would have.
No offer to partner in his long-term care.
No financial support from the former connections publicly criticizing the rescue effort.
Instead, our fundraising posts became a public forum for criticism.
đ´ FACT #9: THIS IS THE PROBLEM RESCUES FACE EVERY DAY
For those who say the industry doesnât dump horses, letâs have an honest conversation.
When horses are sold through open auctions without enforceable lifetime protections, without documented accountability, without follow-up, and without a guaranteed safety net, they are being placed at risk.
That is how horses enter the pipeline.
That is how rescues find them.
That is how horses with names, pedigrees, racing careers, breeding careers, former owners, and known histories end up standing in kill pens.
The pipeline doesnât start at the kill pen.
It starts long before that.
đ´ FACT #10: THE âSECONDARY OWNERâ EXCUSE IS GETTING OLD
One of the most common responses we hear whenever a racehorse, breeding horse, or former industry horse ends up in the slaughter pipeline is:
âIt wasnât the original ownerâs fault.â
âIt wasnât the breederâs fault.â
âIt wasnât the racing industryâs fault.â
âIt was a secondary owner.â
But letâs look at what happened here.
Macho Rocket was publicly listed in a dispersal sale.
Rockets Phenom was publicly listed in that same dispersal sale.
Days later, both horses appeared in the pipeline.
At some point, we have to stop pretending that sending horses through open auctions is a meaningful aftercare plan.
Because rescues know what happens.
Kill buyers know what happens.
Traders know what happens.
The horse industry knows what happens.
Open auction dispersals are one of the primary entry points into the slaughter pipeline.
Not every horse will end up there.
But everyone involved understands the risk.
That is why true lifetime responsibility requires more than good intentions.
It requires accountability.
It requires contracts.
It requires follow-up.
It requires buyback provisions.
It requires a system that protects the horse long after the money has changed hands.
The industry often tells us the problem is the âsecondary owner.â
But when horses are repeatedly moved through systems that provide little to no long-term protection, that explanation becomes harder and harder to accept.
Because the pipeline doesnât start at the kill pen.
It starts with the decisions made long before a horse ever gets there.
đ THE QUESTIONS
If Macho Rocket was important enough to own, breed, market, and publicly fight over, why did he end up in a kill pen?
If former connections cared so deeply, why did the conversation begin with public attacks on the rescue rather than a professional conversation about the horse?
If people thought he was still at the university, how did he appear in a public dispersal sale?
If there was a safety net, why didnât it protect him?
If there wasnât one, why not?
đ WHY WE ACTED
One of our supporters stepped forward and put up half the funds necessary to stop Macho Rocket from shipping.
Journey with Equus stepped up.
Our supporters stepped up.
We secured his safety.
And based on every fact that has surfaced since, we remain convinced we made the right decision.
Because our responsibility was never to social media.
It was never to public pressure.
It was never to the loudest voices in the room.
It was to the horse.
đ TO LINDA ROBBINS, THE ROGERS FAMILY, OR ANYONE ELSE WITH ADDITIONAL FACTUAL INFORMATION
If there are facts we do not have, we welcome them.
If there are contracts, timelines, documents, transfer records, or information that add clarity to this story, we would genuinely like to see them.
If there is information that helps explain how Macho Rocket went from a university breeding program, to a Dan Rogers herd dispersal, to a kill pen, we are open to hearing it.
But this time, we ask that it be done differently.
During the rescue effort, there was no professional outreach to Journey with Equus.
There was no phone call.
There was no effort to sit down and discuss the horse.
Instead, conversations happened through third parties, public comments, social media posts, accusations, and criticism directed at the rescue actively securing his safety.
At the time, much of the information was being shared indirectly, behind the scenes, and without the transparency needed to understand the full story.
As more facts continue to surface, some of the concerns and questions we had at the time are beginning to make a lot more sense.
So if there is more to this story, we welcome it.
Not through rumors.
Not through attacks.
Not through public accusations.
Through facts.
Through documentation.
Through transparency.
Because if the goal is truly the welfare of the horse, then everyone should want the full story told.
And if weâve learned anything through this process, itâs that the full story is often very different from the story people are initially told.
The horseâs welfare came first.
It still does.
And it always will.
â¤ď¸đ´