04/21/2026
Duluth Federation of Teachers, Local #692’s pattern is getting harder and harder to ignore:
When members raise documented inconsistencies, the response is too often the same:
deny, redirect, and blame someone else.
Now look at DFT’s own May 2026 Budget FAQ. It says the President’s 2026–27 pay from union-related compensation is:
$58,660 DFT stipend
$72,186 release time stipend
$5,000 building/property manager
$4,500 estimated DFT contribution to TRA
= $140,346 total
Then it adds that a recent federal 990 shows another $44,975 in “benefits paid on your behalf.”
But the 2022 Form 990 itself lists Ethan Fisher at $43,777 in reportable compensation from the organization, with $0 in related organization compensation and $0 in other compensation on Part VII. And in Schedule O, DFT told the IRS that officer compensation is supposed to be reviewed annually based on comparable locals, their stipends and compensation, the teacher salary schedule, and state averages, then reviewed by the Executive Board and general membership for approval.
That is the issue.
Not Facebook posts.
Not “negativity.”
Not members asking too many questions.
The issue is that DFT keeps changing the explanation depending on the audience.
To members: “You’re misrepresenting things.”
To the IRS: compensation is based on teacher salary schedules and comparable unions our size.
In the FAQ: actually add release time, building manager pay, TRA contribution, and nearly $45,000 more in benefits.
If compensation is truly tied to teacher salary and comparable locals our size, then DFT should be able to show the actual research, the comparisons, the Budget Committee documentation, and the membership approval trail. That is exactly the kind of information members repeatedly requested. Instead, the record shows repeated delays, inconsistent claims about availability, and unresolved requests for budgets, stipends, minutes, and supporting documentation.
This is why trust keeps breaking down.
Because every time the numbers do not match, the defense is not clarity.
It is spin.
It is redirection.
It is blame.
Members are not the problem for asking questions.
The inconsistency is the problem.
If DFT’s own Schedule O says officer compensation should be grounded in teacher salary schedules and unions comparable to our size, then show the documents.
Until then, members have every reason to keep asking why the story changes every time the paper trail gets closer. Education Minnesota AFT NEA Today Minnesota AFL-CIO