08/10/2026
Drafting a nice estoppel argument for our corrupt sheriff and psycho Brady list cop
I keep saying state there was no state at all this was a family boudrieau psycho project shadow prosecution which is lol lol lol fake all of it but narcissists are fake so theres that
And with that - that means cox dismissing the AGO and blocking that data is void and i just destroyed your entire corporate firms defense which is all procedural anyway because they cant touch the merits without compromising their license its LOL LOL LOL
Heavily investgated with no information filed is lLOL LOL LOL that we lawfully obtained from a judge you mean after your son invented it the jokes write themselves sincerely absolute trash
This is LOL LOL LOL you are estopped
Field Case Report: 2024-6796
Print Date/Time: 03/17/2025 10:15
Login ID: sboudreau (ORI:WA0070000).
Because it wasnt stolen and lying sack of s**t brandon boudrieau manufactures probable cause because hes an ego injured narcissist piece of trash - this data right here intentionally obstructed from affidavits the coercion of the informant Patterson conflict of interest all of it made up - fascist Af your own leak you still by law have to notify the individuals.
But if you claim theft well since you want to continue that hilarious line im going to hoist you by your own lying sack of s**t petard bye bye illegal arrest yes i have the receipts unlike psycho brady list cop i back up my claims date july 17 - no report to AGO well if the record was stolen by law 30 days 🤣🤣🤣🤣🖕🖕🖕🖕
You don’t get to claim theft you psycho piece of absolute s**t - when you dont even follow the fu***ng law but criminalize the person who turns it into the AGO when in fact that is what you were supposed to do you fascist fragile piece of s**t
Literally criminalizes cant make it up what he was by law supposed to do turn it into the AGO
But when you got psycho cops criminalizing transparency and coercing cognitively impaired vulnerable witnesses and perjurying warrant affidavits and lying under oath thinking they are prosecutors throwing little rage fits at prosecutors because they wont bring charges with their perjured affidavits coerced witnesses void convictions constitutional rights violations who reject their mommy son boudrieau loop discovery who are absolutely retaliatory fragile pieces of corrupt criminal trash but of course we dont want an outside agency looking at this psychopathic bulls**t
Equitable Estoppel Against The Government Bars The Columbia County Sheriff’s Contradictory "Stolen Property" Narrative
When Field Case Report 2024-00006796—containing unencrypted personal information—was leaked outside an agency's custody, exposing the unredacted full names, phone numbers, home addresses, and full dates of birth of 12 private citizens, the Columbia County Sheriff's Office fell into immediate statutory default. Under RCW 42.56.590(2)(a)(i)(D) an individual's first name or first initial and last name in combination with a full date of birth constitutes protected "Personal Information" that triggers non-discretionary notice state reporting duties. Specifically, RCW 42.56.590(1) establishes a non-negotiable 30-day deadline within which an agency must notify every single affected citizen following the discovery of a secure system compromise under RCW 42.56.590(2). Furthermore, if the data breach impacts more than 500 residents, RCW 42.56.590(7) commands the agency to formally report the breach to the Washington State Attorney General's Office within that identical 30-day window.
1. The Agency's "Stolen Record" Fabrication Triggers a Statutory Default
The State’s theory of criminal possession is a structural paradox barred by the strict doctrine of equitable estoppel against government entities. While equitable estoppel against the government is generally disfavored, it is mandated under Washington law where its application is necessary to prevent a manifest injustice and the exercise of governmental authority will not be impaired. Pursuant to Lybbert v. Grant County, 141 Wn.2d 29, 35, 1 P.3d 1124, 1127 (2000), a party seeking to assert equitable estoppel against a government entity must establish by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence: (1) an admission, statement, or act inconsistent with the claim afterwards asserted; (2) action by the other party on the faith of such admission, statement, or act; (3) injury to such other party resulting from allowing the prior admission, statement, or act to be contradicted; and (4) that estoppel is necessary to prevent a manifest injustice. Kramarevcky v. Dep't of Social & Health Services, 122 Wn.2d 738, 744, 863 P.2d 535, 538 (1993).
The Sheriff’s Inconsistent Statements and Acts:
If Field Case Report 2024-6796 was truly stolen from a secure database, that event legally constitutes an unauthorized acquisition of personal data under RCW 42.56.590(2). Under Washington state cybersecurity policies, the agency was legally required to run a technical assessment and pull system logs to identify how a secure facility was compromised.
No such forensics exist. Under the state's WaTech Risk Assessment Matrix and RCW 42.56.590(2)(c), an acquisition via a "criminal act including theft" sets the risk rating to HIGH, forcing a strict, mandatory 30-day timeline to notify the affected 12 private citizens and report the breach to the AGO under RCW 42.56.590(4).
Reliance and Injury: By failing to generate a forensic risk assessment report and missing the 30-day consumer warning deadline, the agency stands in direct default of RCW 42.56.590. The state cannot administratively treat the document as an un-breached, non-stolen file to avoid state-level consumer protection compliance, while concurrently asserting a "theft" on the criminal track to manufacture the probable cause needed to execute a retaliatory clawback search warrant against a whistleblower.
The Prevention of Manifest Injustice: The government cannot use its own calculated statutory nonfeasance as a sword to trammel individual liberty
The State is legally and equitably estopped from deploying a manufactured criminal possession narrative when its own regulatory and administrative actions have completely denied the existence of the underlying database breachn
