Washington Wildlife First

Washington Wildlife First A nonprofit dedicated to protecting Washington's wildlife.

Washington Wildlife First's mission is to transform Washington’s relationship with its fish and wildlife from an approach centered around consumptive use to a more democratic paradigm that values science, recognizes the intrinsic value of individual animals, and prioritizes protecting, preserving, and perpetuating wild lives.

🚨 Tell WDFW: Advance compassionate, precautionary protections for cougars, lynx, and other hunted wildlife.There are onl...
08/25/2026

🚨 Tell WDFW: Advance compassionate, precautionary protections for cougars, lynx, and other hunted wildlife.

There are only six days left to help shape Washington’s hunting rules for the next three years.

By Sunday, August 30, WDFW is asking the public which potential 2027–2029 hunting-rule changes should advance toward formal proposals. This is our chance to show that Washingtonians want wildlife management grounded in compassion, precaution, and harm prevention.

We’re asking wildlife advocates to back measures that would:
- Better protect cougar mothers and dependent kittens.
- End baiting for cougars and small game mammals.
- Reduce unintended wildlife capture in rodent traps.
- Reduce the risk of killing Canada lynx during bobcat hunting.
- Restrict trail cameras during fall hunting seasons.

These are practical, common-sense protections for wild animals and their families. Your voice can help move them forward.

Please take a few minutes to complete both WDFW surveys, then share this post so more Washingtonians can speak up before the deadline. Find survey links and step-by-step guidance in our alert: https://conta.cc/4qBUJQ9

Washington’s wild animals need caring voices like yours. 🐾💚Registration is open to testify at the August 14–15 Fish & Wi...
08/07/2026

Washington’s wild animals need caring voices like yours. 🐾💚

Registration is open to testify at the August 14–15 Fish & Wildlife Commission meeting, either virtually or in person in Long Beach. The Commission will address important topics, including:

🐺 Killing wolves in response to livestock conflicts
🛡️ Protections for state-endangered and threatened species
🐦 Maintaining state-endangered status for the streaked horned lark

These discussions could shape wildlife policy for years to come. Commissioners need to hear from Washingtonians who want our state to prioritize protection, prevention, and coexistence over exploitation and killing. Testimony spots can fill quickly, so please register ASAP!

And, if you're not sure what to say or how the process works, join our free Virtual Testimony Prep Workshop this Monday, August 10, from 6–7 p.m. First-time speakers are warmly welcome—you don’t need to be an expert, just someone who cares about wildlife.

➡️ View our full alert for testimony registration, workshop registration, suggested talking points, and meeting details: https://tinyurl.com/augcommissionmeeting

📣 Learn How to Speak Up for  ’s  : Commission Testimony Prep Workshop If you’ve ever wanted to advocate for wildlife but...
08/04/2026

📣 Learn How to Speak Up for ’s : Commission Testimony Prep Workshop

If you’ve ever wanted to advocate for wildlife but weren’t sure how to get started, this workshop is for you. Join WW1 and NARN ( Northwest Animal Rights Network ) on Monday, August 10 (6:00–7:00 p.m. on Zoom) for a free, beginner-friendly session designed to help you feel confident and prepared ahead of the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission meeting in Long Beach (August 13–15).

We’ll cover everything you need to know to participate effectively—how to register, how to structure and deliver public testimony, and what to expect whether you’re speaking in person or online. We’ll also preview key agenda items, including proposed changes to wolf-livestock conflict rules, updates to Washington’s endangered and threatened species lists, and the status review of the state-endangered streaked horned lark.

The Fish & Wildlife Commission plays a major role in shaping wildlife policy across Washington, from and to protection and recovery. At every meeting, the public has a chance to directly address commissioners during Open Public Comment—an important opportunity to make your voice heard in decisions that affect the future of wildlife in our state.

🗓 Monday, August 10 | 6:00–7:00 p.m. (Zoom)
🔗 Register via: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/-zrud8YkS9OGBCeCBn4dBQ #/registration

We hope you’ll join us in speaking up for Washington’s wildlife! ✊🐾

📰 The independent investigator’s report into allegations against Washington Fish & Wildlife Commissioners and wildlife a...
08/01/2026

📰 The independent investigator’s report into allegations against Washington Fish & Wildlife Commissioners and wildlife advocates has finally been released.

We’ll release a detailed analysis next week. In the meantime, read our full statement below and access the report athttps://wawildlifefirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/WDFW-Commission-Final-Report-Addendum.pdf

Statement from Dr. Fran J. Santiago-Ávila, Science & Advocacy Director, WW1:

We are reviewing the report released yesterday by Governor Ferguson’s office and expect to issue a full analysis next week. Several findings, however, are already clear.

The report provides substantial new evidence that WDFW Director Susewind and Deputy Director Windrope abused their authority by launching a pretextual investigation targeting wildlife advocates for protected First Amendment activities. In interviews conducted before we filed our civil rights lawsuit, they were candid about targeting Washington Wildlife First, Executive Director Claire Loebs Davis, and commissioners who communicated with us. The interviews indicate that their real concern was the threat Washington Wildlife First poses to their control over fish and wildlife policy—a system dependent on controlling information, suppressing dissent, and excluding the perspectives of most Washingtonians, who neither hunt nor fish.

We are disappointed by the report’s extremely limited scope. After nearly a year and more than $80,000 in taxpayer funds, the investigator interviewed only eight people and failed to consult readily available sources, such as commission meeting records, that could have resolved ambiguities and corrected factual errors. Most importantly, there was a lack of understanding of the investigation’s context. Instead, she appears to have accepted the scope, documents, and assertions provided by Susewind and Windrope without questioning them or examining their motivations.

We are also profoundly disturbed by the report’s apparent suggestion that pursuing legal action against a government agency limits one’s right to communicate with public officials. Washington Wildlife First has repeatedly used the courts to ensure WDFW follows the law. Exercising that right does not forfeit our right to speak, participate in government, or hold public officials accountable. The government cannot silence or exclude us as punishment for exercising our legal rights.

see: https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2026/07/31/fish-and-wildlife-commission-probe-finds-wrongdoing-doesnt-recommend-punishment/

👀 Is Washington's wildlife leadership worse than Florida's?! 😱A recent investigation in Florida describes wildlife agenc...
07/24/2026

👀 Is Washington's wildlife leadership worse than Florida's?! 😱

A recent investigation in Florida describes wildlife agency officials using state resources to monitor critics of the agency, particularly—but not exclusively—those opposing the state's controversial bear hunt: https://floridaphoenix.com/2026/07/23/florida-wildlife-agency-targeted-its-critics-for-secret-surveillance/

While the facts differ from our case, the similarities are striking!

Our federal civil rights lawsuit alleges that Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Director Kelly Susewind and Deputy Director Amy Windrope used agency staff and resources to target commissioners and members of the public who criticized their leadership and advocated for stronger wildlife protections—including, but not limited to, successfully opposing Washington's spring bear hunt. Rather than engaging with those concerns, Susewind and Windrope used state power not just to monitor, but to retaliate against protected speech and association, violating our First Amendment rights.

This kind of conduct has no place in public service. When public officials target wildlife advocates for speaking out, they threaten both our constitutional freedoms and wildlife advocacy itself. That's exactly why we're taking Susewind and Windrope to court—and why this case matters far beyond Washington's wildlife policies. ✊🐾

➡ Learn more about our lawsuit: https://wawildlifefirst.org/not-my-wdfw/raising-our-voices-for-wildlife/

🚨 Take Action: Tell Congress to Oppose H.R. 9621Congress is considering H.R. 9621 (Baumgartner/Randall), the Northwest E...
07/20/2026

🚨 Take Action: Tell Congress to Oppose H.R. 9621

Congress is considering H.R. 9621 (Baumgartner/Randall), the Northwest Endangered Salmon Prevention Act—legislation that would dramatically expand the killing of harbor seals and sea lions while weakening the science-informed protections of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, one of our nation's most successful wildlife conservation laws.

Despite decades of research, there is no reliable scientific evidence demonstrating that killing more seals and sea lions will meaningfully recover salmon. At the same time, the bill threatens intelligent, sentient, socially complex animals that play important roles in healthy marine ecosystems far beyond their relationship to salmon (like preying on salmon predators and serving as prey for transient orcas) and sets a troubling precedent for weakening wildlife protections whenever they become politically inconvenient.

Washington should be leading with science, responsibility, and compassion—not dismantling one of our nation's cornerstone wildlife protection laws.

📢 Tell your WA Congressional Delegation to VOTE NO on H.R. 9621 and support real, science-informed solutions for salmon.

➡️ Take action: https://wawildlifefirst.org/killing-seals-and-sea-lions-wont-save-salmon-tell-congress-to-oppose-h-r-9621/

🚨 URGENT ACTION FOR WASHINGTON’S WOLVES 🚨Today, WDFW killed another adult male   from the   pack, and the facts make thi...
07/01/2026

🚨 URGENT ACTION FOR WASHINGTON’S WOLVES 🚨

Today, WDFW killed another adult male from the pack, and the facts make this especially outrageous.

Last week, WDFW moved to kill from the Tucannon pack after calf predations in the pack’s territory. But even WDFW’s own disclosures show at least one producer failed to properly monitor cattle, leaving injured and vulnerable calves on the range.

It gets worse. When staff went out to kill wolves, they found an adult male had already been illegally around June 21—the date of the last reported predation—suggesting the conflict had already stopped.

Under Susewind’s own “incremental” approach, that should have triggered an evaluation period. Instead, WDFW killed another wolf, even though predations had already stopped for about 9 days.

There was no clear justification for killing another wolf. Yet WDFW did it anyway. This is killing on autopilot—not management, not , and not science. This is .

Tell Governor Bob Ferguson that this type of unscientific and unethical “management” from WDFW is unacceptable, that WDFW leadership must be held accountable, and that Susewind has to go.

📞 Gov. Ferguson’s office: 360-902-4111
📧 Contact Gov. Ferguson:https://governor.wa.gov/contacting-governor/contacting-governors-office/send-gov-ferguson-e-message

Why this matters:

• There was no justification for killing a second wolf after predations had stopped for roughly 9 days.
• Susewind ignored his own “incremental” removal framework by failing to pause and evaluate after one wolf had already been killed.
• Science increasingly shows lethal removal can worsen conflict by destabilizing wolf families.
• By responding to poaching with more killing, WDFW risks rewarding illegal behavior and sending a dangerous message.

deserves wildlife leadership that reflects our values by promoting coexistence rather than perpetuating senseless killing.

Please call and email Gov. Ferguson today, and speak up for Washington's wolves. 🙏 🖤🖤

Find more information and suggested talking points here: https://conta.cc/4gPa9O2.

06/27/2026

🚨 Collusion Confidential — Episode 3: The Spring Bear Flashpoint 🚨

In the third episode of Collusion Confidential, we go back to the vote that helped spark everything that followed: the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission’s decision to end recreational spring hunting.

After Episodes 1 and 2 exposed the Knoll memo and the speculative, defamatory allegations used to target pro-wildlife commissioners, Episode 3 explores the conflict at the heart of it all.

We explain why the hunt was so controversial, why it was increasingly difficult for agency leadership to justify, and why a small but powerful group—including Director Kelly Susewind—became so determined to bring it back.

This wasn’t just about bears. It became a flashpoint in a much larger battle over protection, public values, and who gets to shape wildlife in .

And for the commissioners who voted to end the hunt, the backlash has never stopped.

Watch, share, and stay tuned for Episode 4, where we’ll show how hunting-rights groups weaponized this vote to inflame their supporters and cast pro-wildlife commissioners as villains.

Until then, keep up the fight to protect wildlife—and yes, keep colluding. ✊🐾

06/22/2026

🚨 Collusion Confidential — Episode 2: An Investigation Built on Speculation 🚨

In the second episode of Collusion Confidential, we take a closer look at the now-infamous Knoll memo—the document used to justify WDFW Director Kelly Susewind’s effort to remove pro-wildlife commissioners from the Washington Fish & Wildlife Commission.

The problem? Its allegations are not grounded in evidence, but in reckless speculation, unsupported assumptions, and defamatory claims about commissioners whose real “offense” was speaking too often with the “wrong” people and expressing the “wrong” viewpoints.

Even more troubling, the Knoll memo was completed the very same day the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance petitioned Governor Ferguson to remove the same commissioners—using strikingly similar allegations and language.

The timing—and the similarities—raise important questions about the extent of cooperation between Susewind and the Sportsmen.

Check out our annotated version of the Knoll memo, so you can see the allegations—and our analysis—for yourself:https://wawildlifefirst.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026.06.22-Annotated-Knoll-Memo.pdf

Watch, share, and stay tuned for Episode 3.

Until then, keep up the fight to protect wildlife—and yes, keep colluding.

Address

P. O. Box 760
Copalis Crossing, WA
98536

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Washington Wildlife First posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share