01/01/2016
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL SMART ADVOCATES AND SOUTH MECKLENGURG TAXPAYERS FROM YOUR SMART DIRECTORS!!! IMPORTANT NEWS TO SHARE!!
If you think 2015 was an interesting year get ready for 2016. We need everyone involved. SMART enters 2016 firmly behind the Stop I-77 toll lanes in the North and completely linked to the "OPEN OUR LANES" Group in South Charlotte dedicated to stopping the proposed toll lanes on I-485.
To start things off on Thursday 14 January, 6PM at Raintree Country Club, SMART will sponsor a Citizens' Toll Summit featuring our Brothers and Sisters fighting toll Lanes on I-77 in the North, The CRTPO Chair and the founder of Open Our Lanes against I-485 Hot lanes in the South. More details and invitations will follow shortly. So mark your calendars because space is limited!
As expected if you have read the Observer recently, next week will see a bunch of toll lane activities. The head of "Open our lanes" has requested our help to put the pressure on. What follows is a letter everyone needs to copy and email to their City and County Reps. Please do that and be there at Raintree on the 14th
To: List below for both City and County members
Subject: Vote No on the costly, unnecessary I-485 toll lanes
City Council Member [County Commissioner],
I’m sure your inboxes have been stuffed with letters asking you to vote against the I-77 toll lanes. I agree with their cause and strongly ask you to vote against the I-77 toll lanes (and ask your CRTPO representative to do the same). But often ignored is another project that I wanted to ask you to vote no on the costly, unnecessary I-485 toll lane project.
I’ll start with a simple question, “What problem does NCDOT believe HOT lanes will solve on I-485 that general purpose lanes cannot solve at a fraction of the cost and a multiple of the traffic capacity?”
And I’ll answer it for you. For $83 million, NCDOT added general purpose lanes from Rea Road to I-77 on I-485 (Phase 1) and what happened, congestion was reduced significantly. Today, the problems on I-485 are limited. The Inner loop experiences nearly no traffic at all. The Outer loop tends to only see congestion during a 2-hour rush hour, with the largest component present where lanes reduce (i.e. between Johnston and Rea Road, reduces to 2 lanes). Further, NCDOT came to City Council in January 2015 and provided a heat map that showed that the only areas they expect to see high capacity in 20 years are in Phase 1. Yet, our current plan, a Phase 2, calls for a $203 million project to add one more lane, a toll lane from I-77 to US-74. Why should we spend $203 million when congestion is very limited and the cost to expand with a general purpose lane would only be $84 million.
I quote that number because the Rea Road to US-74 expansion is around the same distance as Phase 1 so adding a lane there should cost the same $83 million. Adding an additional general purpose lane to Phase 1 should cost only $1 million because, as you may recall from Spring 2015 discussions, asphalt has already been laid for that lane and NCDOT argued not to open it because it would cost $1 million to do so. This would save nearly $120 million! The reason for the excess cost is because of toll lane facilities and 3 direct “fly-overs” (read bridges) that will bring cars from roads like Westinghouse Boulevard directly into the I-485 toll lanes. This additional $120 million cost is expensive, unnecessary and solves no problem! Meanwhile, NCDOT has not conducted a revenue study to determine the amount of revenue they expect from the usage of the toll lanes.
In private conversations, I have heard that the revenue is expected to only pay for toll lane management. So what pays for the extra $120 million of unnecessary cost?!
About that capacity thing. Express lanes intentionally provide only a fraction of the road capacity (typically no more than 10%) in order to ensure speed can be maintained at 45mph. So we spend $120 million of unrecoverable additional funds to get a lane that it is only used by 10% of the overall traffic?! Where is the logic in this decision?
So answering my question, there is not a discernible “problem” to be solved on I-485. And if you want to add capacity for future growth, why not do so for $120 million less with more road capacity by building general purpose lanes?!
Please, vote against the costly, unnecessary I-485 toll lane project.
[Your Name]
EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR YOUR USE
City: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
County: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]