11/23/2021
What we've been thinking about this November:
The response to the current crisis has fallen heavily on local municipal and school . Their ability to implement and design communication systems which build trust and keep people safe in this constantly changing landscape has been heroic.
Given that the crisis is ongoing, we have not had the energy or time to reflect on how we have historically dealt with different national safety threats whether they be an outside threat or an internal one.
In the USA outside threats from a foreign adversary are handled at the federal level with our defense department. At most we would ask governors to activate the National Guard to perform vital functions.
The federal government is routinely activated for policy and leadership when the issue or threat does not recognize state borders as in air pollution, water resources, workplace safety, consumer safety, food safety, transportation safety, etc.
Knowing which level of & governance to activate for the best results has been a long-term ongoing debate in the USA the impacts of not understanding criteria for when something is best handled locally, state-wide, nationally can cause serious unintended consequences.
Ideally, all three levels of public leadership would be aligned and work together. We recognize that a good deal of the face-to-face communication and service delivery is the responsibility of our local government officials.
It really is time for a re-invention of how all levels of public leaders (particularly local) are trained on enhanced outreach skills to assure civility and partnerships with citizens.