01/24/2026
Wildlife Relocation, Trapping? Food for Thought.
Relocation
In the State of California, the relocation of urban mammalian predators—also known as apex predators and mesopredators—is illegal. (Specifically noted are raccoons, skunks, opossums, foxes, coyotes, ringtail cats, etc.) The removal or relocation of these animals creates a trophic cascade, which is an ecological phenomenon triggered by the addition or removal of top predators and involving reciprocal changes in the relative populations of predators and prey through a food chain. This often results in dramatic changes in ecosystem structure and nutrient cycling. In a three-level food chain, an increase (or decrease) in carnivores causes a decrease (or increase) in herbivores and an increase (or decrease) in primary producers.
Wildlife Relocation: Not a Solution
One of the most disturbing trends in urban wildlife management is the increasing reliance on relocation to resolve human–wildlife conflicts. Relocation is commonly perceived as a quick, effective, and humane solution. It is, in fact, none of the above. In the vast majority of cases, relocation is an ineffective, inhumane, and ecologically destructive method for dealing with urban wildlife.
Most wildlife relocation goes undocumented. Local trappers relocate thousands of animals illegally every year, often driven by misguided attempts to “give an animal a better home” or concerns about protecting human safety and/or property. The vast majority, however, can be described as “relocations of convenience.” These are situations in which wildlife is perceived as causing a nuisance or disruption on someone’s property (tipping over garbage cans, eating out of pet food bowls, denning under houses, etc.). These are also situations that, with a little time and effort—and usually at significantly less cost than relocation—could be resolved without removing the wild animal.
Relocation is usually ineffective. A new animal will typically and quickly replace the one that was relocated. Effective long-term solutions can only be achieved by identifying what is attracting the animal and then removing the attractant (covering garbage cans, feeding pets indoors, sealing potential denning areas in attics or under porches, etc.).
Relocation is often inhumane. Many animals do not survive relocation. Each year, multitudes of wild animals are brought in injured or orphaned as a result of trapping. Animals that are relocated must fight for new territories and are often injured or killed in the process. Relocation of a mother and her young is almost always futile, as she must not only fight for territory but also find food, shelter, and a safe place to raise her young. Juveniles left behind after parent animals are trapped most likely die from starvation or exposure, as they are effectively abandoned under these circumstances.
Relocation is biologically unsound. Relocating wildlife into new territories can disrupt the animals already living there. It is also a fast way to spread disease among wildlife populations. In many instances, sick animals are brought to animal shelters or care centers and housed in cages side by side with animals that are about to be relocated, often with no intake health evaluation.
Overburdening the ecosystem with more wildlife than nature can sustain is another consequence. What many people do not consider is that others may also be dumping urban wildlife into the same locations, creating unnaturally dense populations. These animals then struggle to survive because established wild populations already exist there, and competition for food, water, and shelter becomes unsustainable.
Trapping: Bad for Wildlife, Save One Exception
The rules on trapping leave little room for anything other than euthanasia due to state laws. The sole exception is in cases involving infirm, sick, injured, or orphaned animals, which may be turned over to licensed wildlife rehabilitators.
Wildlife trapped by pest control agencies must be released on-site or immediately euthanized. California state law prohibits the relocation of predatory mammals (CCR Title 14, Section 465.5). Furthermore, should traps cause injury, suffering, or crippling of the trapped animal, the trapper may be further prosecuted for inhumane treatment of animals under Section 597 of the Penal Code.
NO TYPES OF BODY-GRIPPING, LEG-HOLD, SNARE, COLLARUM, DOG-PROOF RACCOON TRAPS, OR TRAPS THAT CATCH LIMBS, HEAD, FACE, OR NECK SHOULD EVER BE USED. ONLY NON-LETHAL, HUMANE, AND VERIFIED CAGE TRAPS SHOULD BE USED. NOTE: CRUELY KILLING WILDLIFE BY ANY METHOD IS A CRIME PUNISHABLE BY STATE AND LOCAL LAWS UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
This is brought to by Gregory Randall Wildlife Ecologist - Wildlife Mentoring of the Central Coast