06/04/2026
Ex-NRA chief Wayne LaPierre loses appeal of $4 million corruption penalty
A Manhattan jury in 2024 found that LaPierre spent NRA donor funds on designer Italian suits, private flights and insider contracts.
MANHATTAN (CN) — Wayne LaPierre, the embattled former CEO of the National Rifle Association, lost his appeal of a court order requiring him to repay about $4.3 million to the organization he led for decades.
In a five-page ruling, a New York appellate court on Tuesday upheld the 2024 penalty against LaPierre, which was levied after a jury found he misappropriated millions of dollars of donor funds while at the NRA’s helm. In addition to the financial punishment, LaPierre was also barred from holding a leadership role at the gun rights nonprofit for 10 years.
LaPierre, 76, argued the court order violated his First Amendment rights. He said New York Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the case against LaPierre and the NRA in 2020, sought to fine him for his political expression.
But a panel of judges on New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, disagreed. The more than $4 million LaPierre was ordered to pay was not a fine, the judges ruled Tuesday. They found the restitution instead “serves the remedial purpose of reimbursing the NRA for the losses LaPierre caused, making it compensatory in nature.”
The judges also upheld his ban on re-joining NRA leadership.
“The 10-year ban does not burden LaPierre’s rights to freedom of speech and association, as he remains a member of the NRA and is not precluded from making any public statements or involving himself in fundraising or other outreach,” the panel ruled. “Moreover, to the extent LaPierre argues that the attorney general brought this action against him in retaliation for his exercise of free speech, we reject this contention.”
In a statement to Courthouse News, LaPierre’s lawyer Kent Correll said “we’ve already won the most important parts of this case, we intend to seek further review and we are confident that we’ll prevail fully in the end.”
“We defeated Letitia James’ claims seeking judicial dissolution of the NRA, we defeated her claim seeking appointment of a monitor to surveil the NRA, and we got three of the four claims she asserted against Wayne LaPierre personally thrown out,” Correll added. “We expect the remaining claim against Mr. LaPierre will be thrown out, too, either by the New York Court of Appeals or by the United States Supreme Court.”
James said in a statement on Wednesday that the decision “upholds the jury’s verdict and is another victory in our efforts to ensure that LaPierre is held accountable for his illegal self-dealing.”
“Wayne LaPierre and other senior NRA leaders broke the law by funneling millions of dollars in lavish perks to themselves and their families,” James said.
LaPierre resigned just days before the start of the 2024 trial, citing health reasons. He had been the NRA’s front man since 1991, and was largely credited with transforming the nonprofit from an apolitical Second Amendment advocacy group to one of the most powerful — and controversial — unofficial wings of the Republican Party.
He argued on appeal that his resignation should render moot the court’s ban on him serving as an NRA official. But the appellate judges shot down that argument, too.
“Given the jury verdict, LaPierre would have been removed for cause had he not resigned suddenly,” the panel wrote.
In the New York attorney general’s bombshell case, LaPierre was accused of fostering a culture of self-dealing and corruption within the NRA.
A Manhattan jury found LaPierre misappropriated more than $5 million in donor funds to finance first-class travel, Italian designer suits, insider contracts and other self-serving perks for himself and his inner circle. It also found that the NRA itself failed to stop him by suppressing whistleblowers in violation of state nonprofit law.
“For nearly three decades, Wayne LaPierre has served as the chief executive officer of the NRA and has exploited the organization for his financial benefit, and the benefit of a close circle of NRA staff, board members, and vendors,” James claimed in her 2020 complaint.
LaPierre had argued at trial, unsuccessfully, that the exorbitant spending was driven by safety concerns. He testified that he was the victim of a swatting incident in 2013, received numerous death threats and was harassed in public. As a result, he said he was told by NRA security that he “must fly private,” though he also admitted that billing some of the travel costs to the nonprofit was “not the right thing to do.”
Since the trial, the NRA has undergone significant changes in leadership, much of which has been directly ordered by the court as a result of this case. But the fallout from the probe has also been devastating for the group’s image, fundraising and political strength.