12/18/2025
The entire premise of this article is fundamentally flawed. Newsday and others operate on the same false premise. They assume use of force rates should exactly match the percentage of population of any given group. This is wrong to the point of being naive.
Consider this, males are about 50% of the population. Yet when broken down by gender, rates of incarceration fluctuate between 90 and 93% male. Meaning males are disproportionately arrested, convicted and incarcerated relative to their population percentage. Does anyone think the justice system discriminates against males? If this staggering number was any other demographic it would be widely written about. It isn't. Why isn't there a mention of anti-male discrimination?
The answer of course is it doesn't fit the narrative and in fact debunks the absurd premise of this article. Namely, that all factors are the same amongst racial groups including how often they commit crime.
Take the example of asian people given in Newsday's story. This is a traditionally disenfranchised group yet police use force less against them than white people. So in the racial hierarchy that Newsday establishes are white people discriminated against when compared to asian populations? Ridiculous.
We need to end the race baiting, fear mongering and division. We should look at all factors including who is committing the crimes, how likely they are to resist arrest, fight the police or cooperate when having a police interaction.
We should also look at culture, upbringing, school atmosphere, poverty levels and other socioeconomic factors that correlate with your likelihood to obey the law.
Only then, will we get to the real root causes of this issue and start to come up with solutions.
-Lou Civello
President
Suffolk PBA
Newsday
Five years after reforms, Black people were nearly 11 times as likely to experience police force as white people by Nassau and Suffolk police, Newsday found.