Brandywine TB Southern Region Neighborhood Coalition

Brandywine  TB Southern Region Neighborhood Coalition Stronger Together we Prosper! As your Neighborhoods Civic Voice in Prince George's County
in Southern Maryland a Citizens, Civic, HOA’s alliance.

Together, we can make a difference! Our mission is to create and maintain an environment where business and community will prosper by supporting all projects and activities which will contribute to the positive growth and development of Prince George’s County, Brandywine and it’s community. Many Communities • One Voice • Keeping Community Informed Brandywine / Thomas Brooke, Southern Region Neighb

orhood Coalition (B/TB, Coalition)

Your Civic Voice as an alliance of South County Civic, HOA’s, Citizens & Neighborhood Associations

🗞️📣✳️🚨DISTRICT 9 🚨SUBREGION 5 PUBLIC ALERT — WRITTEN TESTIMONY STILL OPEN UNTIL JUNE 24🚨 If you missed the Joint Public ...
06/17/2026

🗞️📣✳️🚨DISTRICT 9 🚨SUBREGION 5 PUBLIC ALERT — WRITTEN TESTIMONY STILL OPEN UNTIL JUNE 24🚨 If you missed the Joint Public Hearing on the Subregion 5 Minor Plan Amendment and Sectional Map Amendment — SMA, you still have time to submit written testimony. The BTB ECCB 26 Page testimony is being submitted for the public record.

This matters because the Master Plan shapes future growth, and the SMA changes zoning on the ground.

That means this process can affect:
Traffic
Water and sewer capacity
Public facilities
Stormwater and flooding
Environmental justice
Title VI concerns
Neighborhood character
Data center and water-demand impacts
Agricultural and rural land protection

Brandywine, Clinton, Accokeek, and surrounding communities
Once the zoning map is changed, residents are often left fighting project by project after the policy door has already been opened.

The Planning Department’s own notice says the amendment may address long-term changes involving focused development, targeted rezoning, infrastructure enhancements, walkability, transit access, agriculture, rural character, housing, jobs, and preservation.

That is not small. That is the future land-use framework.
Residents should ask:
Who benefits?
Who pays?
What infrastructure comes first?
What zoning changes are being proposed?

How will Brandywine and Subregion 5 be protected?
Where is the environmental justice and Title VI review?
How will water/sewer upgrades and data center impacts be handled?

This is not about being anti-growth. This is about infrastructure-first planning, public accountability, and equal treatment for every community.

Submit written testimony by June 24 through the County Council’s eComment portal.

Before the map is changed, the public deserves the truth.

Campaign language is easy. Documented public record is harder.

🗞️📣✳️ 🚨What Is Coming: The Grounded Ledger: 🚨 Brandywine is entering a new phase of community accountability. The Execut...
06/17/2026

🗞️📣✳️ 🚨What Is Coming: The Grounded Ledger: 🚨 Brandywine is entering a new phase of community accountability. The Executive Community Citizen Board (ECCB), working through the Brandywine/TB/Southern Region Neighborhood Coalition, is preparing to launch 🚨The Grounded Ledger — a public accountability record designed to track promises, public decisions, agency actions, land-use impacts, infrastructure commitments, environmental justice concerns, and community follow-through.🚨

This matters because BTB/ECCB is not a temporary campaign, outside advocacy project, or political committee.

We are Brandywine’s resident-rooted civic coalition structure.
We are the only civic group coalition in Brandywine operating with representative community covenants, documented public engagement, institutional history, and a continuing accountability record on land use, zoning, infrastructure, public health, environmental justice, and government responsiveness.

That means when we speak, we are not speaking from rumor, slogans, or political convenience.

We speak from records.
We speak from resident experience.
We speak from documented public participation.
We speak from community covenants that establish our role as representatives of Brandywine’s civic interests.

The Grounded Ledger will serve as the public-facing accountability file.

Each issue will track:
What was promised.
Who was responsible.
What the public record shows.
What remains unresolved.
What residents need to do next.

The Ledger will include accountability dashboards, receipt-based fact checks, land-use monitoring, infrastructure tracking, civil rights documentation, public notice concerns, agency response records, and procedural education through the Parliamentarian’s Corner.

This is not a newsletter for political noise.

This is a community accountability instrument.

Brandywine deserves more than last-minute notices, verbal promises, campaign statements, and decisions made without meaningful resident oversight.

We are putting the record in one place.
We are preserving the receipts.
We are tracking the commitments.
We are holding the process accountable.

First Issue: September 2026

Executive Community Citizen Board (ECCB)
Brandywine/TB/Southern Region Neighborhood Coalition
Brandywine’s Community Watchdog for Accountability

🚨 PUBLIC ALERT: SUBREGION 5 MASTER PLAN & SMA 🗞️📣✳️ 🚨Subregion 5 residents: this is one to pay attention to!🚨The Subregi...
06/09/2026

🚨 PUBLIC ALERT: SUBREGION 5 MASTER PLAN & SMA 🗞️📣✳️ 🚨Subregion 5 residents: this is one to pay attention to!🚨The Subregion 5 Master Plan and SMA are not just planning documents. The Master Plan shapes future growth. The SMA changes zoning on the ground. Residents need to understand what is happening before the map is changed.

The Subregion 5 Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment — SMA are not just planning documents. These decisions help shape what gets built, where it gets built, what zoning is allowed, and who carries the long-term impact.

The Master Plan sets the policy direction for future growth.

The SMA changes zoning on the ground.

That means this process can affect:
Traffic and road capacity
Water and sewer demand
Public facilities
Police, fire, EMS, and schools
Environmental justice and Title VI concerns
Flooding and stormwater
Data center and energy-related impacts
Neighborhood character

Brandywine and Subregion 5’s future land-use direction
Once the zoning map is changed, communities are often left fighting project by project after the policy door has already been opened.

That is why public engagement matters now.

Residents should be asking:
Who benefits?
Who pays?
What infrastructure comes first?

How will Brandywine and Subregion 5 be protected?

Where is the accountability before decisions are locked in?

This is not about being anti-growth. This is about responsible growth, infrastructure-first planning, environmental justice, and equal treatment for every community.

The public deserves the truth before the map is changed.
Campaign language is easy.

Documented public record is harder.

🗞️📣✳️ DISTRICT 9 CANDIDATES QUIET ON THIS: 🚨This is bigger than one development project🚨Residents should pay close atten...
06/02/2026

🗞️📣✳️ DISTRICT 9 CANDIDATES QUIET ON THIS: 🚨This is bigger than one development project🚨Residents should pay close attention to what is happening in real time 🚨The same public agency entrusted to review, regulate, and protect the public interest in land-use decisions is now appearing in court alongside the private developer in coordinated joint filings seeking dismissal of the appeal challenging Dobson Farms. DENIED!

At the same time, CR-080-2025 and CB-029-2025 moved through the County Executive (Acting Tara Jackson) and County Council process, creating the very policy pathway used to reverse prior adequacy for roadways denials and move these projects forward.

That is why this matters.

This is not just about Dobson Farms or Saddle Ridge. This is about Adequate Public Facility Ordinances (AFPO):
• Government accountability
• Public trust
• Infrastructure adequacy
• Police response standards
• Development oversight
• Whether residents still have a meaningful voice in the process

And here is the question District 9 voters should be asking right now:
Why have we not heard a meaningful public concern from District 9 candidates about the Planning Board, the County Executive, the County Council, CR-080-2025, CB-029-2025, or the coordinated legal posture now unfolding around these approvals?

If no one is willing to speak when public process, accountability, and community protections are on the line, then voters have to ask:

Will it simply be business as usual?

One appeal. One record. A lot of unanswered questions.

Know the facts. Read the record. Protect the public interest.

Choice Is Voice!
06/01/2026

Choice Is Voice!

🚨 THIS WEDNESDAY. 45 minutes. One topic. The economic future of Prince George’s County.

Greg Holmes is hosting a live Virtual Townhall on Economic Growth. This is not a rally. This is a conversation about how PG County creates opportunity, grows the tax base, and prepares local talent for the jobs of the future. You will hear the strategy.

You will be able to ask questions directly to the candidate. That is what new executive leadership looks like before someone even takes office.

📅 Wednesday, June 3rd
🕖 7:00 PM to 7:45 PM
💻 Virtual. All residents welcome.

RSVP on our Facebook event page to save your spot. Then send this to someone in Prince George’s County who is ready for new executive leadership with a strategy, not just a slogan.

🔗 https://www.facebook.com/share/14aH17fiVJR/ | gregholmesforpg.com

🗞️📣✳️ DISTRICT 9🚨Are We Tired of the Noise Without Accountability? 🚨We are going to say this plainly🚨We are tired of com...
06/01/2026

🗞️📣✳️ DISTRICT 9🚨Are We Tired of the Noise Without Accountability? 🚨We are going to say this plainly🚨We are tired of community noise makers, Facebook critics, Nextdoor complainers, and keyboard commentators who always have something to say — but when it is time to actually evaluate candidates, ask real questions, listen to real plans, and review the record, too many people do not show up.

Everybody wants to complain about traffic, overdevelopment, crime, infrastructure, schools, taxes, environmental injustice, public safety, and lack of transparency. But when a candidate forum is organized to lay out the issues and give residents the information needed to make an informed decision, too many are missing in action.

Then some of the same people run to political debates as if a debate automatically equals substance.

Let’s be clear: political debates have a historical place. The Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858 became a foundational model for public political argument in America. But debates were never meant to be entertainment, political theater, or a substitute for research. They were meant to test ideas, expose positions, and help the public judge leadership.

That is exactly why the joint People’s Agenda 1st™ / ECCB civic accountability process matters.

Residents should not rely on marketing websites, slogans, mailers, endorsements, political clubs, campaign talking points, or social media noise. Candidates were given the opportunity to answer directly through the April 9 and May 9 candidate forums, written responses, and community-facing plans.

That is the record voters should be reviewing.
Respectfully, campaign websites are not receipts. They are campaign statements.

If a candidate says they have “done things” for District 9, voters should ask:
What did they do?
When did they do it?
Where is the documentation?

Was it testimony, meeting records, letters, public comments, videos, coalition work, legislative action, written opposition, or direct involvement before the issue became politically useful?
Assertions are not accomplishments. Visibility is not leadership. A website is not proof.

The BTB Coalition is not here to choose for voters. We are here to make sure residents can make informed decisions based on material facts, actual receipts, and a documented community record.

For decades, BTB has carried the lead on major Brandywine and District 9 issues: environmental justice, air quality, Title VI / civil rights, heavy industrial land use, Dobson Farms, Saddle Ridge, Gas Light / Bevard, infrastructure, public safety, and the cumulative impacts imposed on our community.

BTB’s community history goes back to 1954. Some of our leaders have been doing this work for more than five decades. We know who showed up, who led, who followed, who simply appeared at meetings, and who only showed up when campaign season came around.

And let’s be honest: over 100,000 residents, but only about 7,000 to 8,000 vote in some local contests. That is exactly how communities keep getting managed, ignored, and played. Subjective voting without governance, history, or material facts keeps communities vulnerable.

We do governance — not political noise.

Brandywine’s air quality, power plant emissions, flaring impacts, industrial siting, heavy truck traffic, and cumulative environmental burdens are not new issues. These concerns have been raised for years around Panda Energy, Keys Energy, Brandywine Crossing, and broader industrial approvals affecting our community. BTB Coalition put its name, work, testimony, filings, signatures, and public record on the line.

If any candidate or campaign claims they have done the same, then show the receipts.

Documents. Testimony. Written opposition. Public comments. Meeting records. Coalition filings. Legislative action. Direct action.
Without documentation, proclaimed accomplishments are just words — not a community-proven record.

Vote how you choose — but vote informed.

Read the plans. Watch the forums. Compare the answers. Demand the receipts. Stop letting political noise replace civic responsibility.
Voice is Choice. But an uninformed choice is exactly how communities keep getting managed, ignored, and played.

The joint People’s Agenda 1st™ / ECCB Plan Accountability reviews for participating candidates will be released so residents can compare candidate claims against written plans, forum responses, and the documented community record.

For context, see BTB’s documented environmental justice and Title VI record:
www.btbcoalition.org
https://www.btbcoalition.org/index%20page%20images/EnvironmentalEjMap(BTBWEB)_01d.jpg
https://www.btbcoalition.org/titlevi.html

BTB Coalition / ECCB
www.btbcoalition.com

🗞️📣✳️ RESIDENTS REALITY CHECK: 🚨The issue is not Fairwood winning🚨Good for Fairwood. Residents have every right to fight...
05/21/2026

🗞️📣✳️ RESIDENTS REALITY CHECK: 🚨The issue is not Fairwood winning🚨Good for Fairwood. Residents have every right to fight overdevelopment, traffic strain, infrastructure pressure, and projects that do not fit the character of their community.

The issue is the double standard.
Council Member Wala Blegay publicly praised the Fairwood/Frank Nursery decision as a victory for community voice, neighborhood character, responsible growth, and infrastructure accountability. Those are the exact same principles Brandywine and East Prince George’s County residents have been raising around Dobson Farms and Saddle Ridge.

But when it came to CR-80-2025, the County Council adopted a resolution that temporarily suspended the current police response time calculations used in the Adequate Public Safety Test for residential development. The County’s own legislative record states CR-80-2025 was adopted on July 8, 2025, and that it temporarily suspended the current police response time test calculations used to determine adequate public facilities.

So here is the public question:
If overdevelopment, traffic, infrastructure strain, public safety adequacy, and neighborhood character matter in Fairwood, why did those same concerns not carry the same weight for Brandywine residents fighting Dobson Farms and Saddle Ridge?

Dobson Farms, PPS 4-24014, and Saddle Ridge, PPS 4-24013, were not abstract issues. They involved real residents, real infrastructure strain, real public safety concerns, and real community opposition. The record also shows Dobson Farms later moved through District Council review processes as a development matter, including SDP-2503.

This is not about attacking one community’s win. It is about demanding one standard for every community.

Community voices cannot matter only when it is politically convenient.

Infrastructure concerns cannot matter only in some ZIP codes.
Responsible development cannot be a campaign phrase in one neighborhood and a procedural workaround in another.

Residents deserve consistency, transparency, and accountability from elected officials — especially when they are running for higher office while voting or acting differently in office.

Fairwood matters. Brandywine matters. East Prince George’s County matters. Same rules. Same respect. Same standard.

🗞️📣✳️ DATA CENTER REALITY CHECK:🚨 FOR DISTRICT 9: Residents deserve clarity, not confusion🚨 The People’s Agenda 1st™ ask...
05/18/2026

🗞️📣✳️ DATA CENTER REALITY CHECK:🚨 FOR DISTRICT 9: Residents deserve clarity, not confusion🚨 The People’s Agenda 1st™ asked candidates a required question about data center development. This infographic shows what candidates said in writing and/or live during the May 9 webinar.

The big point:
Hyper-Data Centers are not the same as all data centers.
When a candidate says “no data centers,” voters need to know whether they mean:

A full ban,
a Hyper-Data Center ban,
a moratorium,
or conditional approval with safeguards.

That matters because Hyper-Data Centers can bring major power demand, water use, diesel backup generators, noise, stormwater impacts, utility pressure, land-use changes, and environmental justice concerns.

This issue is also being shaped by intermediaries, consultants, outside organizations, and reports that do not always come directly from the residents most affected. That is why we need a real community-led conversation — not another process where people are studied, summarized, or spoken for.

The People’s Agenda 1st™ is public education only. It is not an endorsement.

Our position is simple:
No quiet rezoning. No back-door approvals. No vague answers. Define the protection.

Voice is Choice.

But informed choice requires clear answers.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=pfbid0368ATcqFX3w4goKMGHQ7R6CqkioUkU4ErNkrNuxafJ2hU5Q78MLD6kyzo92Ub4eSml&id=100066646942790&__cft__[0]=AZYysx5RpRX8WW3QuZVjQmrprihPtw30bjT9XGW75RfeQt4fGMed3s3Yn5VhcQME9rVxHUlHVLZmYWJx9PlOvScT_Yq0zSPcT1dfkzEmH0nT64INRQ4WSnkBVmcrRKZH1S2e7mQkX1r1dN1uBZxLwfwW&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R

🗞️📣✳️ DATA CENTER REALITY CHECK: 🚨Hyper-Data Centers ≠ All Data Centers 🚨Residents are confused for a reason. 📍The data center conversation has been watered down, repackaged, and used by too many outside voices, intermediaries, consultants, nonprofits, and political actors who are trying to control the narrative instead of making the issue plain for the people who actually live with the impacts.

So The People’s Agenda 1st™ is pulling out the bull.

This is public education — not an endorsement, not a campaign promotion, and not a political slate. This is about answerability.

Every candidate was required to answer the data center question:

Do you oppose data center development in District 9 as currently proposed, zoned, permitted, incentivized, or being advanced?

The infographic breaks down what candidates said in writing and/or live during the May 9 webinar.

Here is the big public point:
“No data centers” does not always mean the same thing.

A candidate may mean:
Full Ban — no data centers in District 9.
Hyper-Data Center Ban — no hyperscale/high-load facilities, but smaller purpose-built facilities may be considered.

Moratorium — pause approvals until studies, safeguards, and resident concerns are addressed.

Conditional Approval — possible only with strict zoning, public hearings, environmental justice review, infrastructure review, utility protections, and resident oversight.

That difference matters.
Hyper-Data Centers are not just buildings with computers. They can mean major power demand, water use, diesel backup generators, noise, air pollution, stormwater impacts, land-use pressure, transmission infrastructure, and higher burdens on communities already carrying too much.

And let’s be clear: this is also about who controls the public narrative.
Residents should not have to rely on intermediaries, think tanks, academic projects, consultant reports, or “people’s reports” created around them instead of with them. Community knowledge should not be extracted, repackaged, and used to build someone else’s platform while the affected residents are left chasing the process.

The People’s Agenda 1st™ is about putting the people’s questions first.

That means:
No quiet rezoning.
No back-door approvals.
No vague “community engagement.”
No fast-tracking before residents understand the impacts.
No letting outsiders define what protection means for District 9.

This requires a real Omnibus Community Conversation with residents, civic organizations, land-use advocates, technical experts, and directly impacted communities at the table — before policy, zoning, incentives, or permit pathways move forward.

The question is not simply whether a candidate says “I oppose data centers.”

The real questions are:
What kind of data center?
Where?
How big?
How much power?
How much water?
How many diesel generators?
What zoning category?
What public hearing process?
What environmental justice review?
What community benefit?
What enforceable protections?
Who monitors compliance after approval?
This is why The People’s Agenda 1st™ Voicecard process matters.
Voice is Choice — but informed choice requires clear answers.

More to come on this Data Centers... Webinar Coming Soon!

✳️ Residents should know 📥📍Growth should follow capacity — not outrun it. 📥📍🚨This is why the Adequate Public Facilities ...
05/13/2026

✳️ Residents should know 📥📍Growth should follow capacity — not outrun it. 📥📍🚨This is why the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance — APFO — matters.🚨 APFO is supposed to be the public’s protection tool. Before major development moves forward, government is supposed to ask one basic question:

Can the roads, police response, fire/EMS access, schools, water, sewer, stormwater, and public services actually handle the impact?

If the answer is no, then development should be delayed, denied, or conditioned until the infrastructure problem is fixed.

That is why CR-80-2025 matters. When the rules are changed after projects already run into adequacy problems, residents have every right to question whether public safety, infrastructure, and community protection are being pushed aside to clear the way for development.

This is not anti-growth.
This is pro-accountability.
This is pro-safety.
This is pro-community.

Because when public facilities are not adequate, residents pay the price through traffic, flooding, longer emergency response times, overcrowded services, and broken infrastructure.

The bottom line:
Development should not move faster than the public facilities people depend on every day.

Smart growth requires adequate public facilities.

05/10/2026

Address

Mailing Address: 8787 Branch Avenue, Suite POB #17 Clinton MD: McKendree Road
Brandywine, MD
20613

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Brandywine TB Southern Region Neighborhood Coalition posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Brandywine TB Southern Region Neighborhood Coalition:

Share