People for Independence, Voluntaryism, Non-Aggression, and Liberty

People for Independence, Voluntaryism, Non-Aggression, and Liberty People for Independence, Life, Liberty, Property, and Justice. To not perform the act would be unethical.
2.

The ethics of means and ends in persuasion
In assessing the ethicality of persuasive activities, we need to look both at the means of persuasion (the techniques used) and the ends (the results sought). Public relations scholars Benton Danner and Spiro Kiousis provide us with a “taxonomy of means and ends” that charts the possibilities in four categories.
1. You can engage in ethically justifiable p

ersuasive acts in an ethical manner (good ends, good means). This type of act occurs in two manifestations:
• A morally permissible act: One in which the moral agent is neither required by ethics to perform the act nor prohibited ethically from performing the act; that is, to perform the action is moral and to not perform it is also moral.
• A morally obligatory act: An act that the agent has a moral obligation to perform. You can engage in persuasion that is ethically unjustified, but do so in an ethically proper manner (bad ends, good means). Although you could argue that the means justify the ends, you would be on shaky moral ground.
3. You could engage in unethical tactics of persuasion in a persuasive act that is itself morally justified (bad means, good ends). Because you are using morally suspect means to achieve a good end, you might be able to argue for the ethicality of the entire act; however, the questionable tactics would taint your achievement.
4. Neither the persuasive act itself nor the means employed in persuasion are morally permissible (bad means, bad ends). Acts in this category will always be morally prohibited. To summarize:
• When the means and ends of a persuasive act are each morally sound, the overall act will be ethical. The act may be either ethically permissible (that is, ethics permits one to perform the act) or ethically obligatory (that is, ethics requires that one perform the act).
• When the persuasive means are unethical but the ends sought are ethically justified, the ethicality of the act as a whole isn’t as clear. The justification for using unethical means would have to be a strong one.
• When the means are ethical and the ends are not justified, an argument can be logically made in defense of the act, but bad ends are rarely justifiable.
• When both the means and the ends of persuasion are ethically unjustifiable, then the persuasive act itself is unethical (that is, it would be unethical to perform the act).

Canada should be ready to cut electricity, critical minerals, Ontario's premier sayshttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/politic...
08/24/2026

Canada should be ready to cut electricity, critical minerals, Ontario's premier says
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/canada-should-be-ready-to-cut-electricity-critical-minerals-ontarios-premier-says

Ontario Premier Doug Ford said Monday in an interview with The Associated Press that Ronald Reagan would be "throwing up" over President Donald Trump's trade policies and threatened to cut off electricity and critical minerals to the United States if the escalating Canada-U.S. trade fight worsens.

Ford said Trump has underestimated Canadians' willingness to endure economic pain rather than give in to U.S. pressure.

"He underestimates Canada. We're all in," Ford said. "Up here, we're at a fever pitch, everyone's in for an economic war. They know they're going to have to sacrifice."

Ford said Trump had "declared war, economic war against his closest friend and ally" before turning to Reagan, whose opposition to tariffs Ford previously featured in a television advertising campaign aimed at Americans.

Ford noted that Trump keeps a portrait of Reagan near his desk. Reagan was a strong advocate of free trade and repeatedly warned that protectionist tariffs could trigger retaliation and hurt American consumers and workers.

"He'd be throwing up on him from the picture if he knew what was going on, spinning around in his grave right now," Ford said. "He should maybe take that picture off the wall and move it somewhere else. Because right now, Ronald Reagan would be disgusted with President Trump."

Ford's comments came after Prime Minister Mark Carney walked away from trade negotiations with the Trump administration late Friday, saying Washington demanded too much in exchange for tariff relief. The United States imposed 50% tariffs Saturday on about $20 billion worth of Canadian goods, while Carney announced dollar-for-dollar retaliation beginning Sept. 8.

Trump escalated the dispute again Monday, threatening to impose a 50% tariff on Canadian automobiles, auto parts and steel starting next year.

"Canada has been ripping off the United States of America for years," Trump wrote on social media Monday morning. Criticizing what he called Canada's "ridiculously high tariffs" on American farmers, Trump added: "Not sustainable, and NOT ANYMORE!"

Ford threatens critical minerals and electricity
Ford said "everything is on the table" if the dispute worsens, including cutting off electricity and critical minerals from Ontario. He also called for Canada to consider using oil and potash as leverage.

"I'll cut them off," Ford said of critical minerals. "You won't get a grain of sand out of Ontario."

Critical minerals are increasingly important to U.S. national security and manufacturing. The Pentagon has sought more secure supplies of minerals used in military aircraft, missiles, munitions and electronics as Washington tries to reduce reliance on China, which dominates the mining or processing of several strategically important minerals.

Ford specifically cited high-grade nickel shipped to the United States and uranium refined in Ontario.

"What would they do without the high-grade nickel that we ship down to the U.S.?" Ford said.

Ford said Canada should consider increasingly severe retaliation if Trump continues targeting Canadian industries, including oil and potash, while Ontario could raise electricity prices or stop sending power south.

"We power 1.5 million homes and businesses," Ford said. "Everything's on the table. I'll do whatever it takes."

If Trump continues trying to dismantle Canadian manufacturing, Ford said, "he better have a pack of batteries."

Ford has used electricity as leverage before. During an earlier phase of the dispute, Ontario imposed a 25% surcharge on electricity exported to Michigan, Minnesota and New York. Trump responded by threatening to double tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum before both sides backed away.

Auto industry becomes a central battleground
Ford accused Trump of seeking not simply a better trade deal but to hollow out Canadian industries and move production south.

Ford said Trump wants to make Canada a vassal state.

"He wants to bleed out every single sector and bring them down to the U.S.," Ford said.

The auto sector is especially important to Ontario, the center of Canada's vehicle manufacturing industry. Plants and suppliers in Ontario are tightly integrated with factories in Michigan and other U.S. states, with parts routinely crossing the border multiple times during production.

Automakers including Ford, General Motors and Stellantis operate major assembly plants in Ontario, and the wider supply chain supports tens of thousands of jobs. Trump's new threat of a 50% tariff on Canadian vehicles and parts puts that sector directly at the center of the escalating dispute.

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said Monday that "the only reason Canada has auto production in the first place" was because of the 1960s Auto Pact, under which Canada used access to its market to encourage vehicle production north of the border.

"If he thinks the Canadian people are going to roll over and just continue buying American-made vehicles, it's not going to happen," Ford said.

Ford says he opposed preliminary deal
Ford also disclosed that he had opposed the preliminary agreement Carney was considering before Canada walked away from the negotiations.

"I wasn't supporting the deal," Ford said.

Ford said he was unwilling to restore American liquor to Ontario store shelves as part of an agreement and had been prepared to publicly break with the proposed deal.

"I wasn't going to put the booze back on the shelves," Ford said. "I was ready to go out there and call a press conference ... and say I'm not buckling over."

Ford said he understood Washington had sought language late in the negotiations that would have restricted Canada's ability to negotiate trade agreements with other countries without U.S. approval. Carney has called that demand unacceptable and a question of Canadian sovereignty.

"Who does he think he is?" Ford said of Trump. "You gotta be kidding."

Reagan fight returns
Ford's Reagan comments revived an earlier clash with Trump. Last year, Ontario paid for U.S. television advertisements featuring excerpts from a 1987 Reagan address warning that tariffs can provoke retaliation and trade wars.

Trump accused Ontario of misrepresenting Reagan and abruptly ended trade negotiations with Canada. Ford later agreed to pause the campaign so talks could resume.

"He doesn't respect anyone," Ford sad.

Yet despite the increasingly hostile rhetoric, Ford said Canada should remain willing to negotiate.

"I never believe in walking away from the table," Ford said. "Continue negotiating and see where we go."

Ford said "everything is on the table" if the dispute worsens, including cutting off electricity and critical minerals from Ontario.

Trump Financial Disclosure Shows 21,000 Trades in 2025https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-02/trump-financial...
08/24/2026

Trump Financial Disclosure Shows 21,000 Trades in 2025
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-02/trump-financial-disclosure-shows-21-000-trades-in-2025

President Donald Trump made more than 21 000 securities trades in his first year back in office, often in intense bursts tied to market events he created.

The total dollar value of the trades was somewhere between $600 million and $1.86 billion, according to his financial disclosure for 2025, which lists values in broad ranges. Many of the transactions involve large companies that have business with the federal government.

Trump averaged 85 trades per market day, an analysis of the report shows. Just 10 days accounted for about a quarter of all trades executed in 2025. Many of those came during heightened volatility on Wall Street after Trump had already announced policy changes.

There was also dissonance across Trump’s eight separate trading accounts: In more than 200 cases, he bought a stock in one account the same day he was selling it in another.

The chaotic rhythm and large volume of trading add to an emerging picture of Trump’s finances, which critics and watchdog groups have scrutinised for hints that he may be improperly profiting from the presidency. In the same report, he disclosed earning at least $1.4 billion from crypto and memecoin-related businesses in 2025.

Deflected questions

The president on Wednesday downplayed the amount of money he made, saying he was already wealthy when elected, and he deflected questions from reporters about whether he was inappropriately profiting off the presidency.

Purposely, I never speak to any of the people that run the money, but they’re at big institutions, and they invest in whatever they invest,” Trump said at Joint Base Andrews before departing for North Dakota.” You know why I’m profiting? Because the stock market’s going up.”

The Trump Organisation says that the president’s holdings are independently managed by third-party financial institutions that have control over all investment decisions, with trades executed through automated, model-based portfolios and direct indexing strategies. Trump, his family members and his company play no role in making transactions, and receive no advance notice of the trades, according to a company spokesperson.

The White House also said that Trump’s investments are independently managed. “There are no conflicts of interest,” said spokesperson Anna Kelly.

Eric Trump, the president’s son and executive vice president of the Trump Organisation, has said the assets were in a “blind trust.”

“To suggest that individual stocks are being bought or sold, at the discretion of any member of the Trump family, would be a lie and blatantly false,” he wrote in a post on X in May after Trump disclosed more than 3 700 trades in the first quarter of 2026.

At the time, some on Wall Street said they found the frequency of trading to be surprising.

About one-tenth of Trump’s disclosed non-cash investment assets last year were in excepted investment funds – things like mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that are broadly diversified and don’t require detailed asset-by-asset reporting.

But beyond those, it’s unclear which market indexes Trump is tracking. The president lists eight separate investment accounts on the disclosure and their underlying assets, but gives no indication of which institutions he’s using to manage them. There’s some overlap between assets held in accounts, with shares of Lockheed Martin Corp appearing in six accounts, and shares of McDonald’s Corp, Microsoft Corp and Pfizer in seven.

S&P Mainstays

His top overall stock holdings – Apple, Nvidia Corp, Broadcom, Microsoft and Tesla – are mainstays of the S&P 500 index.

Though the volume of the transactions was large, the value of about half of them fell within the lowest range, between $1 001 and $15 000. There may have been even more trades: Officials don’t have to report trades of $1 000 or less.

Overall, Trump reported 15 524 purchases and 5 761 sales of assets.

Occasionally, there was volatility within one of Trump’s accounts. On four days, an individual security was both bought and sold on the same day and in the same account.

For example, as Blue Owl Capital Corp declined 3.1% on September 15, one Trump account – identified only as Investment Account No. 4 – bought more than $1 million in shares in the entity’s stock, according to the disclosures. That day, the same account sold six lots of the same stock. The disclosures don’t indicate the exact value or time of day of the trades.

Some of Trump’s busiest trading days came after announcements of policy shifts, especially around trade. His asset managers executed 616 trades on February 3, one day before tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China were scheduled to go into effect. There were 640 more trades a month later, after Trump lifted a pause on those tariffs. And a month after that, there were 446 trades on April 4 amid a selloff prompted by his “Liberation Day” tariff announcements.

~~~

Trump’s stock disclosure shows more than 1,000 trades in June
https://fortune.com/2026/08/22/trump-stock-market-trading-disclosure-june-vanguard-etf/

President Donald Trump made more than 1,000 securities trades in June, including significant purchases of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Visa Inc., Mastercard Inc. and Cintas Corp., according to a financial disclosure published Saturday.

The transactions totaled between $78.1 million and $263.1 million in the filing published by the US Office of Government Ethics, which shows a range for each transaction rather than exact numbers.

The largest transaction was a June 22 sale of between $5 million and $25 million of shares in a Vanguard Group Inc. exchange-traded fund.

Trump made more than 21,000 securities trades in 2025, often in bursts tied to market events he created. The total value of the trades he made in 2025 was between $600 million and $1.86 billion, occasionally showing buying and selling of the same security on the same day.

The White House says there are no conflicts of interest because Trump’s investments are independently managed. Trump’s son Eric, the executive vice president of the Trump Organization, has said the assets were in a blind trust.

The post Trump’s stock disclosure shows more than 1,000 trades in June appeared first on Fortune.

~~~

Trump Continues Trading Stocks at Warp Speed: Berkshire Bought, Meta Sold
https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/08/23/trump-continues-trading-stocks-at-warp-speed-berkshire-bought-meta-sold/

Quick Read
Trump's June filing shows 1,051 trades worth up to $263 million, including Berkshire buys and Meta sales, executed by independent account managers.

Palantir trades surrounding the June 14 U.S.-Iran peace deal illustrate the conflict-of-interest overlap between Trump's policymaking power and his investment holdings.

Congress passed the Stop Insider Trading Act but deliberately exempted the president and vice president from its stock-trading restrictions.

The stock market has given investors plenty of reasons to stay invested during President Trump’s second term. Since Jan. 20, 2025, the S&P 500 has gained roughly 28%, according to market data, despite a stomach-churning detour in April 2025. After Trump unveiled sweeping tariffs on April 2, the index fell more than 12% in just four trading days, before recovering as the administration paused many of the levies.

That rebound has helped produce a steady stream of new highs — and Trump’s portfolio has been busy along the way too. After executing 3,642 transactions in the first quarter, his latest disclosure shows another 1,000-plus trades in June.

Trump Keeps Trading While Markets Keep Climbing
The latest OGE Form 278-T shows 1,051 securities transactions during June, worth between $78.1 million and $263.1 million. More than 550 were purchases and more than 450 were sales.

Some of the larger disclosed moves included:

Company Notable Q2 Move
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK-B | BRK-B Price Prediction) Bought $1 million to $5 million
Visa (NYSE:V) Bought $1 million to $5 million
Mastercard (NYSE:MA) Bought $1 million to $5 million
Cintas (NASDAQ:CTAS) Bought $1 million to $5 million
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) Sold $1 million to $5 million
Motorola Solutions (NYSE:MSI) Sold $1 million to $5 million
The filing also shows Trump’s accounts moving in and out of Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR), including a purchase on June 3, sales on June 16 and 18, and additional purchases on June 23 and 24. The largest single disclosed transaction was a $5 million to $25 million sale of a Vanguard dividend ETF on June 22.

Be careful about treating these as Trump’s personal stock picks. The White House says independent managers oversee the accounts using computer-based strategies designed to track indexes. Direct indexing can require hundreds of individual transactions, including sales designed to harvest tax losses.

While the explanation matters, it doesn’t eliminate the ethical question.

https://247wallst.com/cdn-cgi/imagedelivery/XaQqGmJkNE7OzU_SNXiB6g/247walls-infographic-mt5uqzfl-0-9j11/medium
A 28% market surge meets a frantic 1,000-trade frenzy. Discover the legislative loophole fueling a presidential portfolio worth millions.
© 24/7 Wall St.

The Conflict-of-Interest Problem Isn’t Going Away
The ethical concern is less about any individual trade than the overlap between Trump’s policymaking and his investments.

His June filing, for example, shows Palantir Technologies trades before and after the June 14 U.S.-Iran peace agreement, including a sale of as much as $1 million on June 18 followed by purchases on June 23 and 24. Palantir is a major government contractor, making it more directly exposed to federal defense and procurement decisions than companies such as Berkshire Hathaway or Meta Platforms.

That doesn’t prove Trump directed the trades or acted on nonpublic information — his investment accounts are reportedly independently managed — but it illustrates why presidential stock trading raises an ethical question even without evidence of misconduct.

Congress Is Trying to Fix the Problem — Sort Of
Ironically, Congress just demonstrated how incomplete the stock trading rules remain.

On July 22, the House passed the Stop Insider Trading Act, H.R. 7008, by a 232-198 vote. The bill would generally prohibit members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from purchasing individual stocks while requiring advance notice of certain sales. Yet, the legislation exempts the president and vice president. An amendment that would have extended the restrictions to the executive branch was defeated in the House Rules Committee.

The bill has since reached the Senate, but its prospects are poor after House Republicans attached a voter-ID provision that Democrats oppose.

For investors, the bigger lesson is straightforward. Don’t copy Trump’s portfolio. The filings arrive weeks — sometimes months — after trades occur, disclose ranges rather than exact amounts, and may reflect automated index strategies rather than convictions about individual companies.

Key Takeaway
Trump’s frenetic trading is fascinating, but it isn’t an investment signal. The S&P 500’s roughly 28% gain since his inauguration demonstrates that investors who stayed disciplined through the 2025 tariff crash have been rewarded.

Smart investors should take the same approach now: own businesses with durable earnings and cash flow, diversify across sectors, and assume Trump’s policies can create volatility without attempting to trade every headline.

In short, the most useful thing about Trump’s 1,000-plus trades isn’t discovering what he bought or sold. It’s remembering why ordinary investors should build portfolios that don’t require knowing what the president will do next.

IRAN HINTS IT WILL SEEK NUCLEAR WEAPONS — w/ Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski
08/24/2026

IRAN HINTS IT WILL SEEK NUCLEAR WEAPONS — w/ Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski

Join this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/c...

'Our Farmers And Ranchers Are Getting Killed': Independent Senate Candidate Blasts Trump Admin
08/24/2026

'Our Farmers And Ranchers Are Getting Killed': Independent Senate Candidate Blasts Trump Admin

While speaking with CNN's Manu Raju on Sunday, U.S. Senate candidat...

08/23/2026
"Thefts don't become gifts, lies don't become truths, crimes don't become laws, corruption doesn't become justice, wrong...
08/23/2026

"Thefts don't become gifts, lies don't become truths, crimes don't become laws, corruption doesn't become justice, wrongs don't become rights, tyranny doesn't become liberty, and aggression doesn't become consent just because it's implemented or accepted by a majority."

~~~

"We the unwilling, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful.
We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing."
~ Frank Sinatra

~~~

"Actions always prove why words mean nothing."

Donald Trump: "We've got to get rid of the $19 trillion in debt."
Bob Woodward: "How long would that take?"
Trump: "I think I could do it fairly quickly .... "
Woodward: "What's fairly quickly?"
Trump: "Well, I would say over a period of eight years .... "
Woodward: "Would you ever be open to tax increases .... "
Trump: "I don't think I'll need to .... "
March 31, 2016

~~~

"I love debt. I love playing with it. I'm the king of debt. I'm great with debt. Nobody knows debt better than me. I've made a fortune by using debt."
~ Donald Trump

~~~

USA National Debt
https://www.usdebtclock.org/
USA Published National Debt
https://www.truthinaccounting.org/about/our_national_debt

USAspending: Government Spending Open Data
https://www.usaspending.gov/

Monetary Base: Currency in Circulation (MBCURRCIR)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MBCURRCIR
Currency in Circulation (DISCONTINUED) (CURRCIR)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CURRCIR

CPI Inflation Calculator
https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
Inflation Calculator
https://www.in2013dollars.com/

100 Years of the Income Tax
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CaPzxU9Ip8

Revenue Act of 1862
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_Act_of_1862

Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Federal Reserve System
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_System

Executive Order 6102
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

US National Debt, US Total Debt, US Unfunded Liabilities
http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Gift Contributions to Reduce Debt Held by the Public
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/gift/gift.htm

Welcome to Trade Ticker - the web's only up-to-the-second counter for the U.S. Trade Deficit.
http://americaneconomicalert.org/ticker_home.asp

Accumulated Trade Deficit Clock
https://sherman.house.gov/legislation/trade-deficit

~~~

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation....
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness....
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.... Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government....
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent...."
~ The Declaration of Independence

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby...."
~ Article VI

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion."
~ Article IV, Section 4

"The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections ... shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof...."
~ Article I, Section 4

"The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."
~ Speech opposing aid to refugees,” January 10, 1794.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
~ Second Amendment

"No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
~ Amendment V

"The President shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
~ Article II, Section 1

"The Senators and Representatives, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution."
~ Article VI

~~~

"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man. We must not conclude merely upon a man's haranguing upon liberty, and using the charming sound, that he is fit to be trusted with the liberties of his country. It is not unfrequent to hear men declaim loudly upon liberty, who, if we may judge by the whole tenor of their actions, mean nothing else by it but their own liberty, — to oppress without control or the restraint of laws all who are poorer or weaker than themselves. It is not, I say, unfrequent to see such instances, though at the same time I esteem it a justice due to my country to say that it is not without shining examples of the contrary kind; — examples of men of a distinguished attachment to this same liberty I have been describing; whom no hopes could draw, no terrors could drive, from steadily pursuing, in their sphere, the true interests of their country; whose fidelity has been tried in the nicest and tenderest manner, and has been ever firm and unshaken....

The liberties of our Country, the freedom of our civil constitution are worth defending at all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have receiv'd them as a fair Inheritance from our worthy Ancestors: They purchas'd them for us with toil and danger and expence of treasure and blood; and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle; or be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men. Of the latter we are in most danger at present: Let us therefore be aware of it. Let us contemplate our forefathers and posterity; and resolve to maintain the rights bequeath'd to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. — Instead of sitting down satisfied with the efforts we have already made, which is the wish of our enemies, the necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that 'if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration, which should deeply impress our minds, that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event....

Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature. The supreme power cannot justly take from any man any part of his property, without his consent in person or by his representative...."

~ Samuel Adams

~~~

"The origin of all civil government, justly established, must be a voluntary compact, between the rulers and the ruled; and must be liable to such limitations, as are necessary for the security of the absolute rights of the latter; for what original title can any man or set of men have, to govern others, except their own consent? To usurp dominion over a people, in their own despite, or to grasp at a more extensive power than they are willing to entrust, is to violate that law of nature, which gives every man a right to his personal liberty; and can, therefore, confer no obligation to obedience...."

~ Alexander Hamilton, Military Commander (American Revolution-Independence), Federalist Papers

~~~

"The consequences arising from the continual accumulation of public debts in other countries ought to admonish us to be careful to prevent their growth in our own....

There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.
Liberty, once lost, is lost forever."

~ John Adams, President

~~~

"The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind. The true foundation of republican government is the equal right of every citizen, in his person and property, and in their management. I place economy among the first and most important republican virtues, and public debt as the greatest of the dangers to be feared. The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale....

Of liberty I would say that, in the whole plenitude of its extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will. But rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual....

A free people claim their rights, as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate. The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest breaks up the foundations of society. And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second; that second for a third; and so on, till the bulk of the society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery, and to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering. Then begins, indeed, the bellum omnium in omnia, which some philosophers observing to be so general in this world, have mistaken it for the natural, instead of the abusive state of man. And the fore horse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression...."

~ Thomas Jefferson, President
author of Declaration of Independence

~~~

"The government of the United States is a definite government, confined to specified objects. Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government. With respect to the words 'general welfare,' I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions. It is to be remarked that the phrase out of which this doctrine is elaborated, is copied from the old articles of Confederation, where it was always understood as nothing more than a general caption to the specified powers, and it is a fact that it was preferred in the new instrument for that very reason as less liable than any other to misconstruction....

I have always conceived -- I believe those who proposed the Constitution conceived -- it is still more fully known, and more material to observe, that those who ratified the Constitution conceived -- that this is not an indefinite government, deriving its powers from the general terms prefixed to the specified powers -- but a limited government, tied down to the specified powers, which explain and define the general terms. The terms 'common defence and general welfare' are not novel terms first introduced into this Constitution. They are terms familiar in their construction, and well known to the people of America. They are found in the old Articles of Confederation. It was always considered clear and certain that the old Congress was limited to the enumerated powers, and that the enumeration limited and explained the general terms. If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their Own hands; they may appoint teachers in every state, county, and parish, and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision for the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress; for every object I have mentioned would admit of the application of money, and might be called, if Congress pleased, provisions for the general welfare....

A pure Democracy, by which I mean a Society consisting of a small number of citizens, who assemble and administer the Government in person, can admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction. A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result from the form of Government itself; and there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party, or an obnoxious individual. Hence it is, that such Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives, as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of Government, have erroneously supposed, that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would, at the same time, be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions....

Without going farther into the subject, I venture to declare it as my opinion, that, were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited government established by the people of America; and what inferences might be drawn, or what consequences ensue, from such a step, it is incumbent on us all to consider...."

~ James Madison, President, "Father of Constitution", Bill of Rights, Federalist Papers

Address

Boston, MA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when People for Independence, Voluntaryism, Non-Aggression, and Liberty posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share