Idaho Energy Freedom

Idaho Energy Freedom We believe that Idahoans can decide for themselves what’s in their best interest.

Who's in the room this Cinco de Mayo?Historians. Businesses. Engineers. Policymakers. Miners. Operators. Legislators. La...
05/04/2026

Who's in the room this Cinco de Mayo?

Historians. Businesses. Engineers. Policymakers. Miners. Operators. Legislators. Large-load customers. Conservationists. Counsel. And the rest of the Idaho energy community.

If you demand, build, finance or depend on Idaho's Energy future - this is an event you do not want to miss.

Join Idaho Energy Freedom and Conversation with Cally Younger – Administrator of Idaho’s Office of Species, Mineral, Energy, Coordination (OSMEC)
this Tuesday, May 5th from 3:00-4:30 PM

Join us for in-person moderated conversation and reception with hosted refreshments and tapas or tune in remotely via live webinar.

RSVP Required: Limited In-person seating available.

🔗 http://IdahoEnergyFreedom.org/event/conversaconversation-with-cally-younger/

PROTECT OUR PROPERTY RIGHTS IN JEROME COUNTYJerome County's energy costs are already too high—and the Board of Commissio...
04/09/2026

PROTECT OUR PROPERTY RIGHTS IN JEROME COUNTY
Jerome County's energy costs are already too high—and the Board of Commissioners is about to make them worse. On Monday, April 13th, 2026, Commissioners are planning to vote on an amendment that would effectively ban all responsible energy development in Jerome County by limiting it to heavy industrial zones.

At a time when Jerome County is growing faster than ever and energy demand is rising to match, cutting off new energy supply will drive prices even higher for families and businesses.

The Planning and Zoning Department has already recommended against this restrictive approach. Now, Commissioners need to hear from you.

https://idahoenergyfreedom.org/jerome-county-energy-ordinance-act/?fbclid=fbclid

12/24/2025

The well would be located a few hundred feet away from residential neighborhoods and other areas frequented by children in Fruitland, Idaho.

12/24/2025
10/07/2025

Idaho continues to lead the way in securing the future of American energy dominance!

It was an honor to join Perpetua Resources at their ribbon cutting event for the new Stibnite Gold Project where critical antimony will be mined to ensure our national security.

09/15/2025

Zoning code changes would effectively ban large-scale solar development on most Ada County land, writes David Garman.

09/15/2025

Idaho Power expects the average number of customers to increase from 648,000 to 867,000 by 2045, according to the energy plan.

07/30/2025

The Ada County Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended a complete ban on solar development across ALL of Ada County. Now County Commissioners must dec...

Don’t Tread on my Sunshine: Stop Ada County’s Solar Land GrabImagine an Idaho future where our agricultural heritage is ...
07/30/2025

Don’t Tread on my Sunshine: Stop Ada County’s Solar Land Grab
Imagine an Idaho future where our agricultural heritage is secure, our economy is robust, and our energy is clean, affordable, and locally produced. This future is within our grasp, powered by one of our most abundant resources: sunshine. Yet Ada County’s proposed zoning ordinance threatens this bright future. The Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Commission has forwarded a proposal that amounts to a de facto ban on solar energy, an act of stunning government overreach that tramples property rights, stifles economic opportunity, and jeopardizes our energy independence. The Board of County Commissioners must see this ordinance for what it is—prohibition, not regulation—and reject it outright.

At first glance, the proposed solar ordinance seems to offer a compromise. After advocates rightly criticized an initial outright ban on solar projects on "prime farmland," the P&Z Commission amended the language. The outright prohibition was softened to state that "Solar facilities shall be strongly discouraged on prime farmland."

However, the expanded ordinance includes almost all Ada County farmland, effectively banning solar projects. This seemingly innocuous change has staggering implications. These expanded categories cover the vast majority of Ada County, meaning the policy of "discouragement" would apply so broadly as to severely limit locations where solar energy projects are likely to receive approval. Let’s be clear: when government "strongly discourages" a land use across nearly an entire county, it is not regulating; it is banning.

Solar leases offer Ada County farmers vital income, helping keep land in family hands and agricultural use intact. It provides an economic lifeline that respects the agricultural nature of the land while ensuring its long-term viability. Without solar leases, farmers are pressured to sell for residential or commercial sprawl.
The proposed ordinance "strongly discourages" solar development, yet the very same zoning code only "discourages" permanent residential and commercial developments on prime farmland. This is a baffling and indefensible double standard. A solar project is completely reversible. After its operational life of 25 to 30 years, the panels are removed, and the land can be returned to agricultural use. The soil beneath is often improved, having rested for decades.

A subdivision or a strip mall is a permanent scar on the landscape, destroying that farmland forever. The real, existential threat to agriculture in Ada County is not solar power; it's the relentless pressure of urban sprawl. By eliminating a viable economic alternative for landowners, this ordinance doesn't protect farms—it pushes them directly into the path of the bulldozer.

The economic and energy consequences of this misguided policy would be felt by every family in Ada County. Idaho’s population is booming, and with it, our demand for energy. If we fail to develop clean, local energy sources, we will become more reliant on importing power, sending our hard-earned Idaho dollars to out-of-state corporations.

Utility-scale solar projects bring millions of dollars in investment to our rural communities. They create high-paying construction and maintenance jobs that cannot be outsourced, providing stable careers for Idahoans. They generate significant tax revenue for our county without placing new demands on schools, roads, or water infrastructure. By slamming the door on solar, we are forfeiting these immense economic benefits. We are choosing to fall behind when we should be leading the charge toward a more secure and self-sufficient energy future.

This isn’t about scenic vistas—it’s about property rights, economic freedom, and energy independence versus government overreach and urban sprawl. Ada County Commissioners must reject this ordinance. Residents, speak up at the July 30th hearing for property rights, economic freedom, and a smart solar future.

Imagine an Idaho future where our agricultural heritage is secure, our economy is robust, and our energy is clean, affordable, and locally produced. This future is within our grasp, powered by one of our most abundant resources: sunshine. Yet Ada County’s proposed zoning ordinance threatens this b...

Don’t Tread on My Sunshine! Stop the proposed ADA County Solar Ban.
07/24/2025

Don’t Tread on My Sunshine! Stop the proposed ADA County Solar Ban.

Lovable Generated Project

Speaking the Quiet Parts Out Loud: IEF Testimony Opposing Ada County Solar OrdinanceIEF Executive Director Peter Richard...
01/22/2025

Speaking the Quiet Parts Out Loud: IEF Testimony Opposing Ada County Solar Ordinance

IEF Executive Director Peter Richardson testified in opposition to Ada County’s proposed solar ordinance on Thursday, January 16, 2025.

Good evening, Commissioners. I am Peter Richardson an attorney here in Boise whose practice focuses exclusively on energy and electric utility issues. I serve as the volunteer executive director of Idaho Energy Freedom which is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to dissuade misinformation about clean and sustainable energy in Idaho.

I speak in opposition to the proposed amendment to the County’s Zoning Ordinance providing a prohibition against solar projects on Prime Irrigated Farm land, “ag land”. This proposed ban is motivated by mis-information – which is exactly what Idaho Energy Freedom was formed to correct.

The ostensible goal of the ban is the preservation of farm land for ag purposes. However, the ban does not preserve farm land and, ironically it eliminates the only tool the county currently has to preserve farm land – which I explain in a moment. First, the ban doesn’t preserve farm land because the current and proposed zoning “use tables” permit many uses on farm land that are incompatible with its preservation, including such non-ag activities as “Single-Family Dwelling[s]” , “Duplex Dwelling[s]”, “Manufactured Home[s]” and “Group Foster Home[s]”. Conditional uses are even less hospitable to ag land preservation such as race tracks, shooting ranges and railroad switching yards.

An ordinance permiting housing, mobile homes and duplexes and conditionally permits railroad switching yards has no credibility as an ag land preservation ordinance. I think it is time to say the silent thing out loud – this is in reality an anti-solar ordinance. Banning solar in the guise of an ag land protection measure is a subterfuge that needs to be called out for what it is. Opponents of solar energy should be honest about their intentions and not engaged in a game of hide-the-ball called “ag preservation.”

My second point is that the irony in all this is that solar development is the only sure way to preserve ag land for future use. Solar projects are required to provide for decommissioning when their useful life has been consumed. That is, solar projects are required to return the land upon which they are built back to the state it was in before the project was completed. It is, in fact, a relatively easy process to remove the footings holding up the solar arrays after which the land is, once again, available to grow crops. The same can’t be said for any other type of development. For instance, when a big box store closes the owner is not required to tear the store down and rip out the foundations, to say nothing of the acres and acres of paved parking lots that would have to be removed and restored. The same is true for all other development – except solar projects. Only solar projects are required to return the land to its original state. By approving large scale solar projects, the county is actually preserving the land upon which they sit for future generations of farmers or for other beneficial uses that will only become apparent decades from now.

In sum, Ada County has only two ways to preserve farm land. One way is to establish an iron-clad-no-exceptions-allowed ban against any and all development on farm land – which this ordinance does not do. The other way is to simply allow utility scale solar projects to be built on farm land as a way to preserve the land for future ag uses.

Thank you for your time and I would be happy to stand for any questions you may have.

IEF Executive Director Peter Richardson testified in opposition to Ada County's proposed solar ordinance on Thursday, January 16, 2025. Good evening, Commissioners. I am Peter Richardson an attorney here in Boise whose practice focuses exclusively on energy and electric utility issues. I serve as th...

Address

877 W. Main Street , Ste. #200
Boise, ID
83702

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Idaho Energy Freedom posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Idaho Energy Freedom:

Share