03/11/2026
, or doesn’t one need a motive in order to make an arrest? Especially when we’re talking about mu*der?
Sure, one could make the argument that ’s social media presence was attention seeking, at worst, but one could also argue that she was a heartbroken 16-year-old girl, desperate for answers. That doesn’t equal a motive.
The police say that they have a “mountain of evidence.” Well… !
I get that they can’t release everything to the media, but no motive, no mu*der weapon, nothing?
Also, with everything that’s already out there, shouldn’t there be a venue change before the trial begins? She’s already being found guilty in the court of public opinion & not allowing a change of venue will make things worse.
It is VERY important to note that Sarah’s stepfather, James, had a long criminal history, (which I’ve included some of the court documents back when Sarah’s mother had to take out a protective order against him), as well as screenshots of the two of them publicly feuding on Facebook, with Sarah’s mother making it very clear that she feared for her life.
Yet, James’ long list of legal troubles have suddenly 🪄disappeared from the web. As if everything had recently been scrubbed clean. Hmmmm….🤔
More to come soon. What I can say for certain is that I remain unconvinced that Sarah Grace Patrick is guilty.
*Remember, guilty without reasonable doubt.
(Before anyone makes any assumptions, I was asked to look into her case a while ago. After doing my own research, things weren’t adding up. So, I agreed to look at additional evidence, as well as talk to witnesses, & a few people who are close to her. Everything I share with you has been legally obtained & I’ve been given permission to do so.)
Sarah DeArmond