international police diplomatic Corp human Rights Thailand group

23/04/2026

Analyzing transcripts or articles shared by Donald J. Trump's account according to universal human rights standards and the definition of racism reveals several interesting points:

and Negative Image Building
In sociology and human rights law, criticism targeting specific ethnic groups is often considered racist or hate speech. Key observations include:

**Stereotyping:** The message names groups of people, such as Chinese and Indians, as coming to "exploit" or "destroy the system," using harsh language, such as calling their country of origin a "hellhole."

**The "us" vs. "them" division:** A comparison is made between past European immigrants (who the author argues are well-integrated into society) and present-day Asian immigrants, accusing the latter of lacking loyalty to their country.

**Claims regarding employment opportunities:** It is stated that "white people don't need to apply for jobs" in certain states because jobs are occupied by Chinese and Indians, using racial issues to create social conflict.

Rights Issues
**Right to Nationality:** The statements attack the principle of **Birthright Citizenship**, a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Attempts to diminish this right are often viewed by administrators and human rights activists as a violation of the basic rights that individuals should receive equally regardless of parental status.

**Dehumanization:** Terms such as "illegal aliens," "vermin," or "cesspool" are used to describe groups of people or immigration situations, which, in human rights terms, constitute dehumanization.

on Organizations and the Justice System
* The American Civil Liberties Association (ACLU) is severely attacked, being labeled a "criminal organization" and a "snakehead" simply because it advocates for legal and human rights issues, thus challenging the rule of law.

Analysis
By international standards, these statements exhibit certain characteristics... "Clearly racist and discriminatory,"
because:
1. It identifies ethnic groups and attacks them with negative attitudes.
2. It instills xenophobia.
3. It uses violent language to incite hatred towards specific individuals.
However, in the political context of the United States, supporters might view this as an expression of "national security" or "preserving traditional culture."
But considering the literal text and word choice, this criticism crosses the line from policy debate to an attack on individuals and ethnic groups.

30/03/2026

Sovereignty, Accountability, and the Human Cost of Ego: A Diplomatic Reflection
​Distinguished Colleagues and Advocates for International Justice,
​The history of global conflict teaches us a sobering lesson: the architecture of war is often built upon the scaffolding of personal ambition. As we reflect on the devastation of past World Wars, we must confront the reality that these were not merely failures of policy, but failures of character—where the "Ego of Power" overrode the collective mandates of humanity.
​The Legal Obligation of Leadership
​In the realm of modern diplomacy, sovereignty is no longer an absolute shield for arbitrary rule; it is a responsibility. The Charter of the United Nations, specifically Article 2(4), mandates that all members shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.
​When a leader chooses to bypass these multilateral commitments to pursue personal or nationalistic expansion, they do not just violate a treaty; they assault the very foundation of global stability. A leader’s "ego" becomes a breach of international law when it treats the global order as a stage for personal legacy rather than a forum for collective security.
​Human Rights as a Strategic Imperative
​We must bridge the gap between "high politics" and human dignity. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) serves as our primary defense against the rise of warmongering autocrats. History confirms that leaders who contemplate external aggression almost always begin by violating the internal rights of their citizens.
​Article 3 (The Right to Life and Liberty) and Article 19 (Freedom of Opinion and Expression) are often the first casualties.
​When a leader silences dissent to consolidate power, they are dismantling the "early warning systems" of peace.
​As practitioners of diplomacy, we must assert that human rights are not domestic luxuries; they are international security requirements. A leader who is not accountable to their people under the UDHR will eventually feel unaccountable to the international community.
​A Call for Humanitarian Diplomacy
​To safeguard our future, we must move beyond traditional "Realpolitik" and embrace a diplomacy rooted in Human Development and International Accountability. Our commitment must be to:
​Uphold the Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Ensuring that sovereignty is never used as a license for a leader’s self-serving violence.
​Strengthen Multilateralism: Reinforcing the UN Charter’s vision where power is mediated through law, not through the whims of individuals.
​Prioritize Human-Centric Development: Addressing the grievances that narcissistic leaders exploit to foster conflict.
​"The Charter of the United Nations was not created to take mankind to heaven, but to save humanity from hell." — Dag Hammarskjöld
​In conclusion, our role as diplomats for peace is to ensure that the "Me" of the leader never eclipses the "We" of the Peoples. We must champion a world where the rule of law acts as a straitjacket for the egos of the powerful, and a shield for the rights of the vulnerable. Let us reaffirm that true leadership is measured by the lives we protect, not the territories we seize.
​Thank you.

05/02/2026

[Strategic Analysis Statement] When the Veil is Lifted: A New Moral Reform and World Order ⚖️🌍
The Epstein scandal is not merely proof of criminal guilt, but the "collapse of the social contract" between global elites and global citizens. As guardians of international justice and peace, we analyze the following key turning points that the world must recognize:

1. The Decline of Dark Power and International Transparency

For decades, global power systems have been driven by an unchecked shadow. This case is evidence that power without good governance is the root cause of corruption. TUN International NGO therefore considers it a core mission to set a new standard of transparency by acting as a central body to monitor the ethics of international leaders and key figures, ensuring that "sovereignty of power" is no longer misused morally.

2. The Establishment of Pure Financial Integrity

We are entering an era where transparency is the most valuable currency. The old financial system that facilitates illicit money laundering must be reformed. The United Kingdom of Atlantis therefore presents innovative financial and economic systems through verifiable digital assets (e.g., ATC) and a return to pegged assets to break the cycle of support for illicit networks and truly restore clean economic power to the people.

3. The Moral Renaissance

When the old state system fails to protect the innocent, humanity needs a stable anchor. Building strong communities based on faith and good morals is a crucial strategy. We focus on creating a global network that connects people through faith and traditional family values, as a bulwark against the interference of distorted and harmful values ​​that endanger youth.

4. A Mission Towards a "Just New World Order"

The world of the future will not be measured by wealth or power, but by the "purity of will." * TUN International NGO will be a key mechanism in promoting international law focused on protecting human rights and children from abuse in all its dimensions.

* The New World Order that we are jointly building. It is an order that upholds truth, transparency, and the fear of sin.

Conclusion: It is time for us to work together to erase this stain and establish a society driven by the light of truth, under virtuous leadership and an accountable system by global citizens.

"For truth will set us free, and a just order will bring lasting peace."

By: Professor・General・Doctor Sriwan Kingjun

Global Secretary-General, TUN International NGO

Emp Solomon of the United Kingdom of Atlantis

21/01/2026

Is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights not part of international law? Is it merely a declaration of the United Nations General Assembly and only has the effect of recommendations, not legal binding force?

1. Formal Status
When it was adopted in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) did have the status of a "resolution" of the United Nations General Assembly. According to the UN Charter, General Assembly resolutions are generally non-binding and are considered a declaration of the collective intent of member states.
2. Evolution to Customary International Law
Although it started as a declaration, over the past 75 years the UDHR has evolved far beyond that. To the point that most international lawyers accept that much of the content in the UDHR has become customary international law, for the following reasons:
* Widespread acceptance: States around the world have incorporated the principles of the UDHR into their constitutions and domestic laws.
* Reference in courts: International and domestic courts refer to the UDHR as a legal norm.
* Fundamental principles: Certain rights in the UDHR (such as the prohibition of torture, the prohibition of slavery) are considered supreme law (Jus Cogens) that all states must comply with without exception.
3. Foundation of Binding Treaties
The UDHR is the "pillar" that gives rise to two main treaties that are directly legally binding on ratifying countries (including Thailand):
* ICCPR: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
* ICESCR: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
When the UDHR is combined with these two treaties, it is collectively referred to as the "International Bill of Human Rights."
Summary of Differences
Issue: Legal Status (Literal)
Practical Status (Current)
Document Type: General Assembly Resolution, Customary International Law
Legal Effects: Guidance on intent, binding as a minimum standard
Enforcement: No direct punishment, used as a basis for diplomatic pressure and litigation
> In summary: If viewed only at the "name" and "origin" according to basic public law principles, it is correctly understood as merely guidance. However, when viewed in the context of modern international law, the UDHR has the status of a law that states cannot ignore and is recognized as one of the most important parts of international law.
The application of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in international litigation is not in the manner of citing a treaty with inherent penalties, but rather as a reference in "customary international law" and as a norm for interpreting the obligations of states.
These are the key ways in which the UDHR is used in the World Court and international mechanisms:
1. Use in the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
Although the ICJ primarily considers cases based on treaties, the UDHR is often cited to affirm that certain rights are... * Customary law that all countries must follow, whether or not they have signed a treaty.
* Case example: In the United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (1980) case, which involved the taking of hostages at the US embassy in Iran, the ICJ stated that arbitrary detention and the inflicting of physical and mental suffering clearly violated the human rights principles reflected in the UDHR.
* Affirmation of humanity: Courts often use the UDHR as a basis to indicate that "human dignity" is something that states cannot violate, even in times of war or political conflict.
2. As a basis for legal interpretation (Interpretative Tool)
International courts, such as the International Criminal Court (ICC), or regional human rights courts (e.g., the European Court of Human Rights), often use the UDHR to define the "scope" of rights.
* For example, if there is a prosecution for torture. The court will refer back to Article 5 of the UDHR to confirm that this right is an inalienable right and has the status of Jus Cogens (a supreme law that transcends any agreement).
3. Use in the mechanism of the UN Human Rights Council:
The UDHR is the main benchmark used in the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, which examines the human rights situation of all UN member states every 4.5 years.
* In this review, if any country violates the principles of the UDHR, the international community can use this point to exert diplomatic pressure, issue resolutions condemning it, or demand amendments to domestic laws.
Summary of the mechanism in litigation:
Format of reference and legal effects in cases:
Customary law base: Used to prove that a state has a duty to comply even if it is not a party to the treaty.
Interpretive tool: Helps to clarify and universalize the definition of "rights."
Evidence: Used to compare whether the domestic laws of a state are "below" international standards.

By Sriwan Kingjun

22/11/2025

🇹🇼 Defending Taiwan's Sovereignty: A Strategy and a Vision for the Global Gold Standard

This article offers insightful perspectives on Taiwan's sovereign status, the restoration of the gold standard in the global financial system, and the role of Taiwanese NGOs in building a new world order. It emphasizes that these perspectives must adhere to key international legal documents and human rights commitments.

🏛️ The Movement to Defend Taiwan's Sovereignty

Recently, Tsai Fu-kuei, Chairman of a Taiwanese NGO, and General Sriwan Kim Jun, Secretary-General, visited several important government institutions, including the Taiwan Provincial Government in Chung Hsing New Village and the Taiwan Provincial Assembly in Wufeng, Taiwan's Legislative Yuan Central Office. The purpose of this trip was to defend Taiwan's sovereignty under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China, a permanent member of the UN Security Council.

These claims cite key legal grounds, including the Treaty of Shimonoseki, the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Declaration, and Japan's unconditional surrender document (the organization claims to possess original copies of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Declaration, and the silk cloth of Japan's unconditional surrender document). The organization believes this move will help resolve the conflict between the Xi Jinping government in mainland China and the Lai Ching-te government in Taiwan.

Note: The Taiwanese NGO "United Nations" (TUN) claims that as one of the founding members of the United Nations in 1945, it established the 48-nation Alliance, a founding member state of the UN, and set up the UN headquarters in New York in accordance with the UN Charter. The organization also believes that the international fraud group led by Sun Yat-sen, Chiang Kai-shek, and Mao Zedong has no legal basis to represent the Republic of China.

💰 Restoring the Gold Standard and Global Monetary Policy

Another core tenet of the organization is the restoration of the gold standard in the global financial system. This idea originates from the underground treasury of the Zhou Dynasty during the reign of King Wu of Zhou. In 1087 BC, gold from the eight major treasuries of the International Gold Union was used to establish national government institutions, including the Central Plains Es**rt Agency and the Southern Es**rt Agency.

Their purpose was to implement God's will by issuing gold as currency, promoting fair trade in all things God created, and ensuring a peaceful and prosperous life for the people. Abolition of Fiat Currency: In 1898, Chen Jialuo, president of the Red Flower Society, advocated a global financial integration policy aimed at ending governments' issuance of fiat currencies based on debt rather than the gold standard. The organization pointed out that issuing fiat currencies based on debt would lead to the accumulation of unpayable debt, which in turn would trigger war, an evil that cannot be eradicated.

Only by restoring the gold standard, with international human rights groups under the mandate of the UN Human Rights Council promoting the use of US dollars as a reserve currency, can true and lasting world peace be achieved.

⚖️ Human Rights Monitoring and Government Prohibition of Human Rights Violations:

Taiwan adheres to God's will and the UN Charter. The NGO TUN stipulates that everyone should receive an average of US$20,000 annually as a living allowance to protect human rights and ensure that people worldwide enjoy their due right to a peaceful and prosperous life.

On Governance:

People's freedom, democracy, and universal values ​​are protected by law. Only by restricting human rights and freedoms in violation of the law can lasting world peace be maintained.

Budget Audit: As an independent administrative body, the government has no right to audit the national administrative budget. This responsibility is handled by the TUN (United Nations Non-Governmental Organization), which reviews and approves the proposals before submitting them to national parliaments for oversight.

Chen Jialuo's global financial integration policy allows governments adhering to the UN Charter to apply for debt relief or humanitarian aid under international law, thereby enabling their people to enjoy a peaceful and prosperous environment.

🚫 International Legal Restrictions

Both the Xi Jinping government of the People's Republic of China and the Lai Ching-te government of Taiwan are subject to international legal restrictions. These two governments are accused of not possessing the original silk fabrics of the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Declaration, and the unconditional surrender document signed by Japan, and therefore have no legal basis to claim sovereignty over Taiwan.

Furthermore, the TUN NGO reiterates that, according to the UN Charter, both governments are prohibited from declaring political independence within the territory, territorial waters, and airspace under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China (Taiwan), a permanent member of the UN Security Council.

Are you interested in reading the original English text translated into Traditional Chinese using Romanized pinyin, or would you like to learn more about the TUN NGO's claim that, based on the UN Charter, sovereignty over Taiwan belongs directly to the Republic of China (Taiwan), a permanent member of the UN Security Council?

22/11/2025

🇹🇼 捍衛台灣主權戰略與全球金本位願景

本文就台灣主權地位、全球金融體系中金本位的恢復，以及台灣非政府組織在建構新世界秩序的作用，提出了富有洞見深省的觀點，並強調了這些觀點應恪守關鍵國際法律文件和人權承諾。

🏛️ 捍衛台灣主權運動

近日，台灣非政府組織主席蔡富貴和秘書長斯里萬·金俊將軍教授訪問了包括中興新村台灣省政府和霧峰台灣立法院中部辦公室省議會在內的多個重要政府機構。此行旨在捍衛（台灣）在中華民國管轄下的主權，而中華民國是聯合國安理會常任理事國。

這些主張援引了關鍵的法律依據，包括《馬關條約》、《開羅宣言》、《波茨坦公告》以及日本簽署無條件投降書（該組織聲稱擁有該馬關條約、開羅宣言、波茨坦公告、日本簽署無條件投降書綢布正本原件）。該組織認為，此舉將有助於解決中國大陸習近平政府與台灣賴清德政府之間的衝突。

註：台灣非政府組織「全民團結」（TUN）聲稱，其於1945年作為聯合國創始成員國之一，創立了48國同盟會聯合國創始會員國，並根據《聯合國憲章》在紐約設立了聯合國總部。該組織還認為，孫文、蔣介石和毛澤東領導的國際詐欺集團沒有法律依據代表中華民國。

💰 恢復金本位制和全球貨幣政策

該組織的另一個核心理念是恢復全球金融體系中的金本位制。這理念源自於周武王統治時期的周朝地下金庫。西元前1087年，以及國際梅協八大金庫的黃金都被用來建立國家政府的機構，包括中原鏢局及南方鏢局。

它們的目的是透過發行黃金作為貨幣來執行上帝的旨意，促進公平貿易上帝創造的萬物，並保障人民和平安居樂業的生活。廢除法定貨幣：1898年，紅花會會長陳家洛倡議全球金融一體化政策，旨在終止各國政府發行非金本位制法定債務貨幣，以債務為基礎的法定貨幣）。該組織指出，發行非金本位制法定債務貨幣會導致無法償還的債務累積，進而引發戰爭，而戰爭是無法根除的罪惡。

只有在聯合國人權理事會國際人權團體奉令推動金本位制的儲備美金，恢復金本位制才能真正實現世界永久和平。

⚖️ 人權監督政府禁止侵犯人權：

台灣遵守上帝的旨意和《聯合國憲章》，非政府組織TUN非政府組織規定，每個人應獲得平均每年2萬美元作為安居樂業週轉金以保障人權，確保世界人民享有安居樂業應有的權利。

在治理方面：

人民自由民主普世價值受法律保障。只有違反法律對人權和自由會受限制才能維護持久的世界和平。

預算審計：政府作為獨立的行政機構，無權審計國家行政預算。這項職責由TUN（聯合國非政府組織）負責，TUN負責審議批准後提交各國國會監督使用。

陳家洛的全球金融一體化政策允許遵守《聯合國憲章》的國家政府根據國際法申請債務豁免或人道援助，從而使其人民都能擁有安居樂業的環境。

🚫 國際法律限制

中華人民共和國習近平政府和台灣賴清德政府均受國際法限制。該兩岸政府被指控未持有（開羅宣言）、（波茨坦公告）及日本簽署無條件投降書的綢布原件，無法律依據主張臺灣主權歸誰。

此外，該TUN非政府組織重申，兩岸政府依據聯合國憲章規定，禁止兩岸政府在聯合國安理會常任理事國中華民國憲法管轄範圍的領土、領海、領空內宣佈政治獨立。

您是否有興趣閱讀中文繁體字以羅馬拼音翻譯英文原文或您希望進一步了解TUN非政府組織，依據聯合國憲章規定主張臺灣的主權直屬聯合國安理會常任理事國中華民國主權所有。

15/11/2025

🕊️ Sustainable Peace: A Foundation Built on Legitimacy and Accountability
​True and sustainable peace is not merely the absence of armed conflict; it is a social, economic, and political structure based on justice, transparency, and respect for human dignity. To achieve lasting peace, we must eliminate the roots of illegitimacy that erode societal trust. This involves addressing the following critical factors:
​1. Eradicating Corruption and Economic Illegitimacy
​Peace will inevitably falter when wealth and power are concentrated through deceit:
​Corrupt Politicians: The presence of politicians who exploit their positions for personal gain destroys faith in the democratic system and prevents national resources from being genuinely utilized to improve citizens' quality of life.
​Illegal Businesses and Money Laundering Hubs: Businesses engaged in illicit activities, in collusion with banks that become money laundering hubs, create a parallel economy of "dirty money." This distorts market mechanisms and fuels transnational crime and instability.
​Transnational Online Scams: Scams relying on cross-border technology inflict severe financial damage and erode personal security on a global scale. These threats demand serious and concerted international cooperation.
​2. Cultivating Strong Citizens and Accessible Opportunities
​Developing people and economic opportunities is a crucial shield against conflict:
​Instilling Cultural Roots and Traditions: Youth must be fundamentally instilled with respect for their local roots and traditions. Respect for one's own culture and the cultures of others builds a strong identity and promotes mutual understanding in a diverse society.
​Access to Capital for Business and Development: Citizens must have access to fair and adequate sources of funding to invest in their businesses and personal development. When the public can become economically self-reliant, inequality decreases, and the reliance on unjust power structures diminishes.
​3. Reforming the International Legal and Justice System
​Global peace requires legal mechanisms that leave no room for exceptions:
​Standardizing Currencies and Economic Stability: While standardizing all national currencies remains an immense challenge, collaborative efforts to create transparent International Financial Stability and Standards will help reduce loopholes for the movement of illicit funds.
​Strict Enforcement of International Law: Peace can only exist if there are shared rules that everyone respects. Strict enforcement of international laws against transnational crime, human rights violations, and the destruction of peace is essential.
​Decisive Penalties for Offenders: Imposing decisive and just penalties on those who violate the law and undermine public peace establishes a standard of accountability and serves as an effective deterrent against crime.
​Establishing International Courts in Every Country: The proposal to mandate international courts in every country, with judges drawn from various nations, would be a critical step toward reducing local or political influence in judging cases involving serious human rights violations or transnational crimes, thereby ensuring greater neutrality and universal justice.
​Conclusion: Sustainable peace is the sum total of accountability at every level: from transparent politics and legitimate economics to capable citizens, and most importantly, a justice system that does not yield to the powerful or the fraudulent. Only when these foundations are firmly established can the world progress toward genuine and lasting tranquility.
​ต้องการให้ฉันช่วยคุณทำอะไรอย่างอื่นเกี่ยวกับบทความนี้อีกไหมครับ เช่น แปลเป็นภาษาอื่น หรือปรับรูปแบบ?

08/10/2025

https://www.atlantianpress.com/breaking-news/

LAUNCH OF THE GOLD STANDARD INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SUMMIT ON OCTOBER 25, 2025.THAILAND Special Order No. 20251005. According to Queen Nobilisa Sriwan Kingju...

14/05/2025

การสร้างสังคมสันติสุข
สังคมสันติสุขเป็นเป้าหมายที่ทุกคนใฝ่ฝันถึง เพราะมันเป็นสังคมที่ทุกคนสามารถอยู่อาศัยได้อย่างมีความสุขและปลอดภัย การสร้างสังคมสันติสุขนั้นต้องอาศัยความร่วมมือจากทุกฝ่ายในสังคม ไม่ว่าจะเป็นรัฐบาล องค์กรต่างๆ รวมถึงประชาชนทั่วไป
ปัจจัยที่มีผลต่อการสร้างสังคมสันติสุข
การศึกษาและการรับรู้: การให้การศึกษาและการเสริมสร้างความรู้ความเข้าใจเกี่ยวกับสิทธิหน้าที่ของพลเมืองและการอยู่ร่วมกันอย่างสันติสุขจะช่วยลดความขัดแย้งในสังคมได้
ความยุติธรรมและความเสมอภาค: การมีระบบกฎหมายที่ยุติธรรมและการปฏิบัติต่อทุกคนอย่างเสมอภาคจะช่วยลดความไม่พอใจและความขัดแย้งในสังคม
การสื่อสารที่ดี: การสนับสนุนการสื่อสารที่เปิดเผยและตรงไปตรงมาจะช่วยให้เกิดความเข้าใจที่ดีขึ้นระหว่างกลุ่มคนที่แตกต่างกัน
การสนับสนุนจากรัฐบาลและนโยบายที่ดี: นโยบายของรัฐบาลที่มีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อสร้างสังคมที่เป็นธรรมและส่งเสริมความเป็นอยู่ที่ดีของประชาชน
แนวทางปฏิบัติในการสร้างสังคมสันติสุข
ส่งเสริมการมีส่วนร่วมของประชาชน: การเปิดโอกาสให้ทุกคนมีส่วนร่วมในการตัดสินใจที่เกี่ยวข้องกับชุมชนของตนเองจะช่วยสร้างความรับผิดชอบร่วมกัน
การสร้างความเข้าใจระหว่างวัฒนธรรม: การส่งเสริมกิจกรรมที่แลกเปลี่ยนความรู้และประสบการณ์ระหว่างวัฒนธรรมต่างๆ จะช่วยลดอคติและความเข้าใจผิด
การพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจที่ยั่งยืน: การสร้างงานและโอกาสที่ยั่งยืนให้กับประชาชนจะช่วยลดปัญหาความยากจนและความไม่เท่าเทียมกัน
การส่งเสริมสุขภาพจิตและความเป็นอยู่ที่ดี: การให้ความสำคัญกับสุขภาพจิตและการสร้างสังคมที่สนับสนุนความเป็นอยู่ที่ดีจะช่วยลดปัญหาอาชญากรรมและความรุนแรง
การสร้างสังคมสันติสุขเป็นกระบวนการที่ต้องใช้เวลาและความพยายามอย่างต่อเนื่อง แต่หากเราร่วมมือกัน เราจะสามารถสร้างสังคมที่ทุกคนสามารถอยู่อาศัยได้อย่างมีความสุขและปลอดภัยในที่สุด