18/08/2026
📚 What exactly is the “public” in public interest?
And who gets to decide what serves it?
The seventh article from the latest issue of the NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy takes a closer look at one of the foundational — yet increasingly contested — concepts in public administration.
Public Interest and the Social Contract: A Dialectical Approach to the Epistemological Foundations of Public Administration
by Yacob Noho Nani, Abdussamad, Abdussamad, Rustam Tohopi, Achmad & Agussalim
The article argues that the meaning of public interest has become increasingly fragmented as governance and public administration evolve.
To address this challenge, the authors introduce the Philosophical-Reflective-Dialectical (P-RD) Model, bringing together social contract theory, contradictions in administrative practice and reflective learning.
What makes the argument particularly interesting is the idea that tensions such as values vs. procedures, centralization vs. participation, and efficiency vs. equity are not merely obstacles to effective administration. They can also become sources of learning and epistemological development.
The article ultimately presents public interest and legitimacy as dynamic outcomes — shaped by the interaction between normative ideals, institutional change and reflective interpretation.
A thought-provoking contribution to discussions on public administration, democratic governance and the evolving meaning of the public interest.
đź“– Open Access | Vol. 19, Issue 1 | June 2026
https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/nispa-2026-0007
The public interest has traditionally been the foundation of public administration, but its interpretation remains fragmented as governance evolves....