22/08/2026
https://www.facebook.com/share/1Upd4cuJBq/?mibextid=wwXIfr
โ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐?โ ๐๐-๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Former Singaporean Nominated Member of Parliament Calvin Cheng has questioned the Philippinesโ decision to surrender former President Rodrigo Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC), arguing that countries should protect their sovereignty and retain jurisdiction over their own citizens.
Cheng, who is also the Honorary Consul of Serbia in Singapore, challenged the ICCโs international standing, noting that several major countries do not recognize the courtโs jurisdiction. โThe issue is that the ICC isnโt even an internationally recognised court,โ Cheng said, citing the United States, China, Russia, India, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam.
He also pointed to what he described as the Philippinesโ unusual position. According to Cheng, the country previously recognized the ICC but later withdrew from the Rome Statute. Despite this, he said, the administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. allowed Duterte to be taken to The Hague even though the Philippines had not rejoined the treaty.
โCountries should not surrender their sovereignty to prosecute their own citizens for crimes, to an international court that isnโt answerable to their people,โ Cheng said.
His remarks are likely to fuel the continuing debate over the ICCโs jurisdiction, Philippine sovereignty, and the governmentโs handling of Duterteโs case. The issue remains highly divisive, drawing strong reactions from legal experts, diplomatic circles, government supporters, and Duterteโs allies.
The ICC maintains that it has jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed in the Philippines during the period when the country was a party to the Rome Statute, while Duterteโs camp and other critics have questioned the courtโs authority following the Philippinesโ withdrawal.