What are the opening hours?

Monday 8am - 5pm Tuesday 8am - 5pm Wednesday 8am - 5pm Thursday 8am - 5pm Friday 8am - 5pm Saturday 8am - 5pm

https://www.facebook.com/114372198348857/

ULYAW, Quezon City (2026)

15/05/2026

This is more than free admission — it is free graduation. Together, we affirm that education is a right, not a privilege. "Mabuhay ang kabataang Pilipino!”

📢 “On May 11, 2026, the Senate unanimously approved Senate Bill 1894 — strengthening RA 10931, the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act. This guarantees free tuition, free technical-vocational training, and expanded financial aid in SUCs, LUCs, and TESDA institutions. No Filipino student will be left behind because of financial hardship.”

📰 What Happened
- The Philippine Senate voted unanimously (21–0) to approve SB 1894 on its third and final reading.
- This rare unanimous vote shows strong unity across political lines, emphasizing that education is a right, not a privilege.
- Senate President Alan Peter Cayetano stressed that this is a legacy for future generations: free, quality, and accessible education.

⚖️ Legal Context
👉 RA 10931 (2017) – First guaranteed free tuition in State Universities and Colleges (SUCs).
👉 SB 1894 (2026) – Amends and strengthens RA 10931 by:
👉 Expanding coverage to Local Universities and Colleges (LUCs) and technical-vocational institutions.
👉 Ensuring stronger and continuous funding.
👉 Clarifying benefits such as free tuition, free technical-vocational training, and additional student aid.

🎓 Key Improvements in the New Bill
👉 Clearer Coverage: All courses are included — academic and technical-vocational.
👉 Stronger Funding: Ensures continuous budget support so benefits won’t be interrupted.
👉 Broader Reach: Extends support to Local Universities and Colleges (LUCs) and technical training centers.
👉 Better Services: Streamlined processes so students face fewer delays and complications.

📚 Benefits for Students
👉 Free Tuition & Fees: No charges for enrollment, facilities, or registration.
👉 Free Technical-Vocational Training: TESDA and similar institutions are covered.
👉 Additional Financial Aid: Grants, student support services, and resources like libraries and labs.
👉 Equal Opportunity: Any qualified student, regardless of income, can study for free.

👥 Public Reaction
- Parents: Expressed relief, saying they no longer need to worry about tuition costs.
- Students: Celebrated the chance to study without financial barriers, seeing this as a path out of poverty.

📅 Timeline of Passage
👉 February 23, 2026 – SB 1894 was filed in the Senate.
👉 May 4, 2026 – Approved on Second Reading in the Senate.
👉 May 11, 2026 – Approved on Third Reading with a unanimous 21–0 vote.
👉 May 12, 2026 – Transmitted to the House of Representatives, where it is still pending.

15/05/2026

A Constitutional reform could reshape leadership and accountability

"Know the Difference. Decide Our Future.”

Presidential System:
👉 Citizens directly elect the President.
👉 Power is divided among the Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary.
👉 Senate and House provide checks and balances.

Parliamentary–Con‑Ass Proposal:
👉 No direct presidential vote — only local elections.
👉 Prime Minister chosen by Parliament.
👉 Possible term extensions and abolition of the Senate.

💡A Constituent Assembly (Con-Ass) is a process where Congress itself proposes changes to the Constitution. If the administration pushes through with Con-Ass to extend presidential terms or abolish the Senate, it would mean rewriting the fundamental rules of government — potentially canceling the 2028 presidential elections and shifting toward a parliamentary system where Marcos could become Prime Minister.

🔎 What Constituent Assembly (Con-Ass) Means
👉 Legal Basis: Article XVII of the 1987 Constitution allows Congress, by a 3/4 vote of all members, to propose amendments or revisions.
👁️‍🗨️ Amendment vs. Revision:
- Amendment = small changes (like adjusting term limits).
- Revision = big structural changes (like abolishing the Senate or shifting to parliamentary government).
👁️‍🗨️ Voting Controversy:
- House view: joint voting, which dilutes Senate power.
- Senate view: separate voting, requiring 18 senators to agree.
- This unresolved issue is critical because abolishing the Senate would directly affect senators’ role in the process.

⚖️ Possible Outcomes if Con-Ass Pushes Through
👉 No Presidential Elections in 2028: If term extension is approved, Marcos could remain in power beyond 2028.
👉 Abolition of the Senate: Proposals suggest removing the Senate to cut costs, replacing it with a single legislative assembly of governors and mayors. This would eliminate the bicameral check-and-balance system.
👉 Shift to Parliamentary System: Executive power would move from a directly elected President to a Prime Minister chosen by legislators. Marcos could transition into this role if his coalition dominates.
- Impact on Checks and Balances: Removing the Senate and extending terms concentrates power in fewer hands, raising concerns about accountability and democratic safeguards.

🚨 Risks and Controversies
- Democratic Legitimacy: Canceling presidential elections undermines the people’s direct vote for the head of state.
- Judicial Review: The Supreme Court could intervene if the process violates constitutional safeguards.
- Political Resistance: Senators, opposition groups, and civil society may resist abolition of the Senate or term extensions.
- Public Backlash: Filipinos historically oppose moves seen as “self-serving” extensions of power (e.g., Marcos Sr.’s martial law era).

📌 Key Takeaway
Con-Ass is not just a technical reform — it’s a fundamental rewrite of the social contract. If pursued, it could extend Marcos’ rule, abolish the Senate, and shift the Philippines toward a parliamentary system. Whether this succeeds depends on Congress’ voting rules, Supreme Court review, and public acceptance through a plebiscite.

14/05/2026

Under Philippine law a senator’s privilege from arrest is limited and does not bar arrest for crimes punishable by more than six years (including crimes against humanity), and RA 9851 contemplates surrender to international tribunals; but executing an ICC arrest warrant inside the Senate raises procedural, separation‑of‑powers, and operational questions that the Supreme Court, DOJ, and enforcement agencies must resolve.

💬 Practical legal issues and risks
👉 Procedural gap: RA 9851 authorizes surrender but does not provide a fully settled, routine domestic procedure for executing ICC arrest warrants; DOJ and courts must interpret and coordinate.
👉 Separation of powers: Enforcement (PNP/NBI/DOJ) implicates executive foreign‑policy discretion; the Legislature’s protective acts can trigger constitutional conflict and possible obstruction claims.
👉 Judicial remedies: The Supreme Court can enjoin enforcement or clarify procedures; recent filings led the Court to require government comment rather than grant an immediate TRO.

💬 Recommended immediate actions (for counsel, DOJ, or civil society)
👁️‍🗨️ For DOJ/PNP: Publish clear operational guidance on surrender vs. extradition under RA 9851 and coordinate with Senate security to avoid confrontation.
👁️‍🗨️ For Supreme Court: Expedite a ruling clarifying whether and how ICC warrants are to be executed domestically and the limits of legislative sanctuary.
👁️‍🗨️ For counsel to the accused: Pursue timely judicial reliefs while preserving due‑process claims; prepare for both domestic and international procedures.

👉 Bottom line
Legally, a senator is not immune from arrest for crimes punishable by more than six years, and RA 9851 gives a statutory basis for surrender to international tribunals — but operationalizing an ICC arrest warrant inside the Senate is a live constitutional and procedural dispute that the Supreme Court and executive agencies must resolve.

12/05/2026

Here are the legal remedies available if the Philippine government refuses to enforce the ICC warrant against Senator Bato dela Rosa:

"NBI CANNOT DIRECTLY APPLY FOR MANDAMUS"

⚖️ Remedies for Victims or Advocacy Groups

👉 Mandamus Petition
Victims or NGOs can file a petition for mandamus before the Supreme Court to compel the DOJ/NBI to perform their duty under RA 9851 Section 17. This is stronger than if the NBI itself filed, since victims have standing as aggrieved parties.

👉 Certiorari or Prohibition
Petitioners may ask the SC to review government inaction or prohibit unlawful refusal to cooperate with ICC. This challenges executive discretion directly.

👉 Declaratory Relief
NGOs or victims can request the courts to declare the scope of RA 9851 obligations post‑ICC withdrawal. This clarifies whether cooperation is mandatory.

👉 Contempt Proceedings
If a court has already ordered cooperation, refusal by government agencies could lead to contempt charges against officials.

👉 International Pressure
Victims can appeal to ICC itself, which may issue public findings of non‑cooperation, escalating diplomatic and reputational consequences for the Philippines.

🔑 Key Implications
- Victims and advocacy groups have stronger standing than the NBI to compel enforcement, since they are directly affected by the alleged crimes.
👉 The Supreme Court remains the ultimate arbiter of whether RA 9851 obliges cooperation despite ICC withdrawal.
👉 These remedies test the balance between sovereignty and international accountability.

08/05/2026

“The Typhon missile being deployed in the Philippines is being protested by China, which wants Beijing to remove these weapons from the Philippines and ‘correct the mistake.’ China opposed the deployment of the Typhon, saying it destabilizes regional security and urged the Philippines to remove the weapon and ‘correct the mistake as soon as possible.’ The Philippines and China have overlapping claims in the South China Sea, leading to confrontations at sea and heated diplomatic disputes.”

🌏 Why China Is Bothered

Strategic Threat: The Typhon system can fire Tomahawk cruise missiles and SM‑6 interceptors, giving the U.S. and Philippines long‑range strike capability from land. This directly challenges China’s naval dominance in contested waters.

Geopolitical Signal: Its deployment during Balikatan exercises signals deeper U.S.–Philippines defense cooperation, which Beijing interprets as encirclement.

South China Sea Disputes: Since China and the Philippines both claim parts of the South China Sea, the presence of advanced U.S. weapons in Philippine territory heightens tensions.

⚖️ Possible Effects if Activated

On China:

Increased vulnerability of Chinese naval assets within a 1,000–1,600 km radius of Philippine launch sites.

Pressure to accelerate development of stealth missiles and missile defense systems.

Diplomatic escalation, with Beijing likely to intensify protests and possibly retaliate with military drills near disputed waters.

On the Philippines:

Strengthened deterrence and defense credibility against maritime coercion.

Risk of being drawn deeper into U.S.–China rivalry, raising concerns about becoming a staging ground for great‑power conflict.

08/05/2026

Anti‑Absenteeism Policy for Elected Officials

Title: Upholding Accountability Through Presence

👉 “Public service is not a privilege—it is a solemn duty. Every elected official carries the trust of the people, and that trust demands presence, participation, and commitment.”

👉 “This proposed Act establishes the Anti‑Absenteeism Policy for Elected Government Officials. It ensures that those entrusted with leadership remain actively engaged in governance. Under this policy, prolonged unjustified absence shall result in the automatic declaration of vacancy in office.

The measure defines clear conditions: thirty consecutive days or sixty cumulative days of unjustified absence within a year will trigger accountability. This is not merely a disciplinary rule—it is a safeguard for democracy, ensuring that every voice in government remains active and every mandate fulfilled.”

👉 “Through this Act, we affirm that leadership is not measured by title but by presence. Let us uphold the integrity of public service and ensure that governance never pauses because of neglect. Together, we stand for accountability, transparency, and continuous service to the people.”

06/05/2026

👉This interview can be framed as an example of how leaders can pivot policies toward inclusivity and rights-based governance while maintaining national security priorities.

“The Philippines is shifting toward a more compassionate and strategic approach to governance.”
“International dialogues like this show how local actions connect to global cooperation.”

Kevin Rudd’s interview with President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos at the Asia Society Headquarters in New York highlighted Marcos’s effort to frame Philippine policy in a way that balances domestic priorities with international cooperation. The “win-win” aspects he emphasized were rooted in shifting the drug war toward prevention and rehabilitation, focusing enforcement on major syndicates, and positioning the Philippines as a constructive partner in regional dialogues.

🇦🇺 Kevin Rudd’s Role
Position: Former Australian Prime Minister, later Asia Society President and CEO.

Context: Rudd interviewed Marcos during an Asia Society forum in New York, bringing global attention to Philippine governance and policy direction.

Focus: Regional cooperation, governance reforms, and lessons from past policies.

🇵🇭 Marcos’s Key Points in the Interview
1. Drug Policy Reform
Shift from enforcement-only to prevention and rehabilitation. Marcos stressed that enforcement under Duterte was vigorous but limited. He argued for education, rehabilitation, and community reintegration as essential to breaking the cycle of addiction.

Targeting syndicates, not small-scale offenders. He instructed law enforcers to prioritize dismantling supply chains and importation networks rather than punishing low-level sellers.

Human rights sensitivity. Marcos acknowledged past abuses and emphasized a more sympathetic approach to drug dependents, aiming to restore their role as constructive members of society.

2. Framing a “Win-Win” Dialogue
Domestic legitimacy: By addressing human rights concerns and shifting focus to rehabilitation, Marcos sought to reassure both Filipinos and international observers.

International credibility: His stance positioned the Philippines as a country learning from past mistakes, aligning with global norms on public health and rights.

Regional cooperation: By engaging with Rudd and the Asia Society, Marcos signaled openness to collaborative solutions in security, governance, and social policy.

🌏 Why This Matters
For the Philippines: Marcos’s approach attempts to balance law enforcement with social reintegration, potentially reducing criticism from human rights groups while still tackling drug syndicates.

For ASEAN and global partners: His dialogue with Rudd reflects a strategic effort to present the Philippines as a responsible regional actor, willing to engage in constructive policy debates.

📌 Key Takeaways
Marcos’s “win-win” framing lies in combining enforcement with prevention and rehabilitation, targeting syndicates rather than small offenders, and acknowledging human rights concerns.

Kevin Rudd’s platform at the Asia Society provided an international stage for Marcos to recast Philippine policy in a more balanced, globally palatable light.

The dialogue underscores the importance of policy evolution—learning from past approaches while aligning with international standards.

06/05/2026

The impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte has formally advanced, with the House Justice Committee finding probable cause and preparing Articles of Impeachment for plenary voting on May 11, 2026. If one-third of the House votes in favor, the case will move to the Senate for trial, where she faces possible removal and a lifetime ban from public office.

ULYAW Stance:
This impeachment is a critical test of the balance between law and political power in the Philippines. The evidence presented—confidential fund misuse, unexplained wealth, and grave threats—are serious allegations that demand accountability. However, the outcome will hinge not only on legal merits but also on political alignments and public pressure.

👉 In short: The truth has a chance to prevail if institutions uphold independence and resist political manipulation. But history shows impeachment trials in the Philippines often become battlegrounds of power rather than pure justice.

🔑 Current Developments
House Justice Committee Report: Approved unanimously, citing corruption, constitutional violations, and betrayal of public trust.
Key Allegations:
Misuse of ₱612.5 million confidential funds (₱500M for OVP, ₱112.5M for DepEd).
Unexplained wealth and failure to disclose assets in her SALN.
Alleged bribery of DepEd officials.
Alleged grave threats and contracting assassination plots against President Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and former Speaker Martin Romualdez.
Financial Records: AMLC flagged ₱6.7 billion in suspicious transactions linked to Duterte and her husband, Atty. Manases Carpio, though both deny the allegations.

⚖️ What Happens Next
May 11, 2026: House plenary vote. At least 106 votes are needed to transmit the case to the Senate.
Senate Trial: If elevated, the Senate will sit as an impeachment court. Conviction requires a two-thirds vote.
Possible Penalties: Removal from office, perpetual disqualification from holding public office, and exposure to criminal prosecution.

📊 Law vs Power: Will Truth Prevail?
Rule of Law: The process is constitutionally mandated, with evidence including COA findings, sworn testimonies, and financial records

Political Power: Duterte’s camp calls the case “fabricated” and warns of social media manipulation and political maneuvering ahead of the 2028 elections.

Public Trust: The impeachment highlights the tension between accountability and entrenched political influence. Whether truth prevails depends on:
Transparency of proceedings.
Independence of the Senate trial.
Public vigilance against disinformation.

06/05/2026

This agreement between Japan and the Philippines is more than just geopolitics—it’s a strategic leap. The early transfer of Abukuma-class destroyers and TC-90 aircraft will immediately boost the Philippine Navy’s maritime defense capacity, while also embedding long-term cooperation in training, sustainment, and technology.

🌊 Strategic Benefits for the Philippines

Immediate Capability Upgrade

Even secondhand Japanese destroyers provide long-range patrol, helicopter operations, and anti-submarine warfare—capabilities the Philippine Navy currently lacks.

TC-90 aircraft enhance maritime domain awareness, crucial for monitoring the West Philippine Sea.

Interoperability with Allies

Ships and aircraft from Japan are compatible with U.S. and allied systems, strengthening joint operations during exercises like Balikatan.

Technology & Skills Pipeline

The working group covers policy, operations, equipment, training, and sustainment, ensuring the Philippines doesn’t just receive hardware but also the know-how to operate and maintain it.

Embedding Filipino officers with Japan’s Maritime Self-Defense Force accelerates learning before the ships even arrive.

⚖️ Geopolitical Context

Japan’s Export Shift

This marks Japan’s first export of lethal naval platforms in decades, enabled by its April 2026 policy revision.

It signals Tokyo’s transformation into a security provider in the Indo-Pacific, not just a passive ally.

Counterbalance to China

Both defense chiefs voiced concern over China’s coercive activities in the South China Sea and East China Sea.

The transfer is a quiet but firm counter-signal to Beijing, showing that Manila and Tokyo are building bilateral defense muscle memory.

🚨 Risks & Challenges

Logistical Burden: Sustainment of destroyers requires larger crews, advanced facilities, and higher budgets.

Training Gap: Transitioning from patrol craft to destroyers demands new doctrines and operational experience.

03/05/2026

🇵🇭 The operational readiness of a integrated, multi-agency coordination, reflects a high level of preparedness and resilience. By unifying the Philippine National Police, Armed Forces, Bureau of Fire Protection, Coast Guard, Department of Health, Office of Civil Defense, and partner agencies, the system ensures:

👉 Seamless coverage of critical areas: site security, convoy management, coastal and airspace surveillance, traffic control, emergency medical services, and rapid incident response.
👉 Intelligence-driven operations: aligned with the PNP Focused Agenda, strengthening proactive monitoring and response.
👉 Enhanced interoperability: agencies working under a unified operational framework reduce duplication and gaps.
👉 Public confidence: visible readiness reassures citizens and international partners that the Philippines can host ASEAN 2026 securely and efficiently.

This model demonstrates not just operational readiness, but also a strategic commitment to resilience and unity — essential for a summit of ASEAN’s scale.

02/05/2026

"Fact vs Allegation”

The poster circulating around SOCMED reflects allegations of massive fund misuse in the Philippines, but these claims are contested and not officially proven. Some are extrapolated from activist estimates or partial audits. Some items, like the 2025 budget “insertions” and PhilHealth fund transfers, have been investigated and criticized, but others remain political accusations without confirmed legal rulings.

🔎 What’s True and What’s Alleged

👉 2025 GAA “Illegal Insertions” (₱241B)
- The Ombudsman received complaints about blank line items in the 2025 budget, allegedly manipulated before approval. House Speaker Martin Romualdez and other lawmakers were accused of falsification. However, defenders said these were “ministerial” adjustments, not fraud. The case is still under investigation.

👉 PhilHealth Funds (₱89B)
- Former President Duterte publicly accused the Marcos administration of mismanaging PhilHealth contributions, citing the transfer of ₱60B–₱89B in unused funds to the national treasury. The Supreme Court even issued a temporary restraining order in late 2024 to stop further transfers. This issue is real and documented, though whether it constitutes “theft” is legally unresolved.

👉 Maharlika Fund (₱250B)
- The Maharlika Investment Fund has faced criticism for lack of transparency and unclear returns. Opposition figures and economists question its sustainability, but no court has declared it unlawful.

👉 SSS, GSIS, DBP, Landbank, Flood Control, Gold Reserves, PCSO, PDIC
- These figures appear in activist posters and social media campaigns, but there is no official audit or Ombudsman ruling confirming all of them as misused. Some may be exaggerations or based on partial reports.

🗣 Who Is Behind These Posters

👉 Likely Sources:
- Civic advocacy groups, opposition politicians, and watchdog organizations (e.g., Citizens Crime Watch, Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez, lawyers Ferdinand Topacio and Virgilio Garcia) have filed complaints and produced materials highlighting alleged corruption.
- Social media campaigns often amplify these numbers to mobilize public outrage, sometimes without full legal basis.

⚖️ Basis and Legitimacy

👉 Legal Basis:
- Complaints filed with the Ombudsman and Supreme Court orders (PhilHealth case) provide some grounding.
- Other claims (e.g., “sold gold reserves,” “missing flood control funds”) are not backed by official audit reports and remain allegations.

👉 Risk of Misinformation:
- Posters like this mix documented controversies (PhilHealth, budget insertions) with unverified claims, making them powerful advocacy tools but not reliable evidence.

✅ Takeaway for You

👉 Some issues are real and under investigation (PhilHealth, GAA insertions).
👉 Others are activist claims without confirmed proof.
👉 Treat the poster as advocacy material, not an official audit.
👉 If you want to use it for civic education, it’s best to cite credible sources (Ombudsman cases, Supreme Court rulings, DBM documents) alongside the visuals, so the message is strong but factually defensible.

📊 ULYAW Civic Education:
Not all claims are proven.
✅ Facts: Documented by the Supreme Court and Ombudsman.
⚠️ Allegations: Raised by activists, still unverified.
🎯 Demand accountability, but always ground advocacy in truth.

ULYAW

15/05/2026

15/05/2026

14/05/2026

12/05/2026

08/05/2026

08/05/2026

06/05/2026

06/05/2026

06/05/2026

03/05/2026

02/05/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Monday	8am - 5pm
Tuesday	8am - 5pm
Wednesday	8am - 5pm
Thursday	8am - 5pm
Friday	8am - 5pm
Saturday	8am - 5pm