11/12/2023
Learning our lessons is the hardest thing
Two weeks ago, on November 23, the PH government and the National Democratic Front (NDF) affirmed and signed a Joint Statement in Oslo, Norway that recognized the need for national unity to address serious socio-economic issues, the country’s external security threats and a peaceful resolution of the armed conflict.
Both parties agreed to formulate a framework that will set the parameters for the final peace agreement, shall be agreed upon by both parties. The joint statement followed months of informal discussions by emissaries of both parties that began in 2022 initiated by the Philippine side which was personally welcomed by then NDFP Chief Political Consultant Prof. Jose Ma. Sison.
The PH government’s signatories Secretary Antonio Ernesto F. Lagdameo Jr.; Secretary Carlito G. Galvez Jr.; and Gen Emmanuel T. Bautista (Ret.). The CPP-NDF-NPA were represented by Fr. Luis G. Jalandoni; Julieta de Lima; and Sr. Coni K. Ledesma.
To be clear, what they signed is not a peace agreement but a statement of intent by both parties to work towards one. I have no quarrel with that. One just has to look around and examine our state of the nation compared to the rest of the progressive world. We still harbor serious unresolved problems that continue to impact on our political, social and economic behavior which favor the “haves” over the “have-nots”.
Through five decades, the divide between a patrimonial oligarchic state and a Stalinist-Maoist force that seeks to establish a one-party dictatorship grew wider, preventing us frombuilding a better, faster and stronger nation.
Yet, while I believe that peace must be pursued, I do have misgivings. Here’s why.
My recollection of the CPP-NDF-NPA goes back to the pre-1986 EDSA revolt when various anti-dictatorship groups tried to forge a united front. That never materialized as they wanted to be in full control as sole leader, unwilling to work on an equal basis.
After the 1986 EDSA revolt they were given democratic space by the Cory Aquino administration “to return to the folds of the law”. Instead, they took advantage of it by infiltrating government and social institutions - the Executive and Legislative branches of government, media, organized groups in civil society to build a formidable united front where they continue to thrive to this day.
Fast forward to my years as SILG and Chair of the National Peace and Order Council. The best chance for peace was during President Fidel V. Ramos’ term. I backchanneled with the leaders of all the rebel groups – RAM-SKP-YOU; MNLF, M**F, CPLA, CPP-NDF-NPA.
His administration succeeded in negotiating peace with the military rebels and the MNLF. The M**F held out until four administrations later. The CPP-NDF-NPA remained the holdouts despite the steep plunge of NPA fighters from a high of over 25,000 to just around 6,000 by 1998.
Ramos aimed to reach a final, comprehensive peace agreement before the end of his term, but the CPP-NDF-NPA had other ideas. They still strove for “total victory”. They were not interested in a final political settlement.
They wanted to protract the peace talks indefinitely to squeeze as much politico-diplomatic gain in creeping fashion to favor their “protracted people’s war.” It took a piecemeal approach to the peace process, one agenda item at a time. Unfortunately, peace with the CPP-NDF-NPA eluded FVR. Succeeding administrations met the same fate.
Consequently, ceasefires that flowed from succeeding peace initiatives were merely used to regroup, retrain, rearm, resupply and redeploy before returning to the battlefield. Battlefield casualties mounted due to ambushes and assassinations.
Recruitment of minors intensified, united front building persisted, democratic space continued to be abused. Terror tactics and pure criminality cowed politicians, businessmen and professionals to pay revolutionary taxes and other forms of “ayuda”. Tactical alliances with secessionist groups were attempted. The infiltration of our institutions exploited dysfunctions in government and society.
How do I see the current state of the CPP-NDF-NPA? If reports are accurate, the military’s relentless efforts have effectively crushed the NPA. The CPP is a shadow of itself today. The party’s adrift after Jose Ma. Sison’s demise and successive arrests of its top leaders; further wracked by internal dissension and power struggles. The NDF ideologues have grown old and weary which is probably the reason why they’re open to peace talks.
Moreover, through diplomatic efforts and law enforcement, its funding sources are drying up. But what’s to stop them from going mercenary for China's CPC-PLA? After all, they think and behave the same way.
That’s why I remain suspicious. Crisis creates opportunity. There’s this gnawing feeling that it could be another ploy, a temporary pause. Partly because its party lists in the Batasan and local government units remain entrenched. Its united fronts in government, business and civil society are still in place.
They may be weakened by leadership and funding challenges, but it’s hard to believe it’s true this time around when trust was broken so many times in the past. From their end, they see that our political culture, economic disparities and social divisions continue to fuel subversion and rebellion, and provide opportunities for exploitation and resurgence.
That’s a sore point for many Filipinos, not just the CPP-NDF-NPA, who long for stability, good governance, moral clarity and ardent patriotism. History continues to repeat itself in our case.
What kind of a final comprehensive peace pact could possibly result between a patrimonial oligarchic state and a Stalinist-Maoist force that seeks to establish a one-party dictatorship?
Both sides bitterly reject each other; the socio-economic-political divides are wider than ever; and there’s a huge trust deficit despite assurances from government quarters that the CPP-NDF-NPA are serious this time to ink a deal.
A real peace deal for our nation’s safety, security and survival could materialize if:
a.) the CPP-NDF-NPA drop their quest for belligerency status and a zero-sum victory for its Maoist agenda; and,
b.) if the oligarchy-controlled government opens its doors to transparency, accountability, good governance and professionalism.
Will they? Only time will tell. Meanwhile, we, the people, must keep our guard up and remain vigilant against another double-cross.