01/03/2026
MEDIA STATEMENT: PRAGMATISM OVER POSTURING – REWARDING CRIMINALS OVER SAVING LIVES – THE MORAL IMPERATIVE OF THE FI****MS AMNESTY AND BUY-BACK SCHEME
I have noted with concern the recent statements made by the Deputy Leader of the Opposition, Hon. Keith Iduhu, regarding the Marape-Rosso Government’s National Fi****ms Amnesty and Buy-Back Program.
While the Opposition is busy applying academic “tests” and ESON frameworks in the safety of Port Moresby, our people in Enga, Hela, and across the Highlands are living under the shadow of high-powered illegal weaponry.
As a leader who has walked these communities, lived in these communities and subjected to the threats of illegal fi****ms, I am compelled to respond to the Opposition’s critique with the cold, hard reality of the situation on the ground.
1. On Ethics: The Morality of Saving Lives
The Opposition asks, “Em stret?” (Is it right?) to use taxpayer funds for this program. I ask the Opposition: Is it ethical to allow a tribal war to escalate because we were too “principled” to offer an exit ramp?
Police operations to “flush out” guns are historically expensive, trigger violent retaliations, and often result in the deaths of both officers and civilians. If a financial incentive prevents a single massacre, that is not a “reward for criminals”—it is a strategic investment in human life. We are choosing a path that avoids funerals.
2. Investing in Families, Not Crime
The Deputy Opposition Leader labels this a “payday for criminals.” This is a gross mischaracterization. Our focus is on sustainable outcomes.
We are targeting the “disengaged”—the youth who have been handed guns because they have no other tools for survival.
By injecting resources into families and clans in exchange for weapons, we are providing the capital for agriculture and small businesses. We are replacing the “culture of the gun” with a “culture of commerce.”
3. The Singirok Report: Action vs. Inertia
The Opposition claims we are “ignoring” the 2005 Singirok Report. On the contrary, we are creating the peace required to finally implement it.
You cannot enforce a “total ban” or “constitutional amendments” while active warfare is tearing communities apart.
The Singirok Report has sat on shelves for 20 years. This Government refuses to let more dust collect while more blood is spilled. This 21-day amnesty is a catalyst for action, not a replacement for long-term reform.
4. A Proven Path to Peace
We have already seen success with the “Undialu model” in Hela. When we engage with our people and provide a dignified way to disarm, they respond. The Opposition calls this a “gimmick,” but to a mother in a conflict zone, it is a lifeline.
Conclusion: Real Enforcement Needs Real Solutions
The Opposition demands a return to “real enforcement.” I remind them that real enforcement without community cooperation is just more conflict.
We are empowering the Royal Papua New Guinea Constabulary by reducing the number of high-powered rifles they have to face in the field.
To the people of Papua New Guinea: The Opposition says “Nogat” to this solution, but they offer no immediate alternative to stop the killing today. This Government says YES to peace, YES to pragmatism, and YES to a safer future for our children.
Sir John Pundari KBE CMG MP
Minister for Police
