What are the opening hours?

Monday 09:00 - 17:00 Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00 Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00 Thursday 09:00 - 17:00 Friday 09:00 - 17:00

Sepik Wetlands & Peatlands Limited, PO Box, Port Moresby (2026)

16/09/2026

LESSON 70: BENEFITS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Carbon projects can provide benefits that extend beyond reducing or removing greenhouse gas emissions. When designed responsibly, they can create new income opportunities, support essential services, strengthen local livelihoods, and encourage communities to protect valuable natural resources. 🌱

For local communities, carbon finance can provide funding for activities such as sustainable agriculture, forest conservation, restoration, renewable energy, and improved land management. These projects can create employment for local workers while developing skills that remain valuable over the long term. 👷

In Papua New Guinea, this can be particularly important for communities connected to forests, wetlands, peatlands, mangroves, and other natural ecosystems. Carbon projects can create opportunities for landowners to generate income from protecting and sustainably managing their natural resources rather than relying only on extractive activities. 🌏

Benefits can also include investments in schools, healthcare, clean water, transportation, community facilities, and local infrastructure. However, these benefits should not simply be promised. Clear agreements should establish how revenues are shared, who is responsible for implementation, and how communities can participate in decision-making. 🤝

Strong community participation is essential. Local people should understand the project, have meaningful opportunities to provide input, and receive fair and transparent benefits. Respect for customary land rights and local knowledge is especially important when projects operate on community-owned or traditionally managed land. 🏡

A high-quality carbon project should therefore create value for both the climate and the people protecting the land. When communities receive fair benefits and have a genuine role in the project, carbon finance can contribute to long-term environmental protection and sustainable economic development.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

06/09/2026

📚 LESSON 69: WHO BUYS CARBON CREDITS

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Carbon credits are purchased by different organizations that want to support climate action and address their greenhouse gas emissions. Buyers can include companies, financial institutions, governments, airlines, and other organizations with climate-related goals.

Companies may purchase carbon credits as part of broader climate strategies. While reducing their own emissions should remain important, some organizations may use credits to address emissions that are difficult to eliminate immediately or to support additional climate projects.

Financial institutions can also participate in carbon markets by investing in projects or purchasing credits for clients and portfolios. Meanwhile, governments may develop carbon programs to support national climate objectives and encourage investment in emission reduction activities.

Airlines and other transport-related businesses may purchase credits because reducing emissions from certain activities can be technically challenging. Supporting credible climate projects can form part of a wider approach to managing their environmental impact.

In Papua New Guinea, international buyers can help direct climate finance toward projects that protect forests, wetlands, peatlands, mangroves, and other valuable ecosystems. Such investment can also support local employment, conservation activities, community development, and sustainable livelihoods.

However, buyers should carefully assess the quality and credibility of credits before purchasing them. Understanding the project, methodology, monitoring process, verification, and wider impacts helps buyers make more responsible decisions.

A strong carbon market connects climate finance with projects that can deliver meaningful environmental benefits. Responsible buyers therefore have an important role in supporting credible and transparent climate action.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

01/09/2026

📚 LESSON 68: COST FACTORS FOR CREDITS

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

The price of a carbon credit can vary significantly depending on the type of project, its location, technology, environmental benefits, and the costs involved in developing and maintaining it. Understanding these factors helps buyers and project developers make more informed decisions.

Developing a carbon project requires investment in activities such as feasibility studies, project design, monitoring, data collection, community engagement, reporting, and independent verification. Projects operating in remote locations may also face higher transportation, equipment, and operational costs.

The type of climate solution can also influence costs. A technology-based project may require significant upfront investment in equipment and infrastructure, while nature-based projects may involve long-term costs for conservation, restoration, monitoring, and community participation.

In Papua New Guinea, projects involving forests, peatlands, wetlands, and mangroves can face additional challenges because many important ecosystems are located in remote areas. Reaching project sites, collecting reliable data, engaging communities, and maintaining long-term monitoring can require substantial resources.

Project scale also matters. Larger projects may spread certain development and monitoring costs across a greater number of credits. Smaller projects may have higher costs per credit but can still deliver important environmental and community benefits.

Ultimately, the cost of a carbon credit should not be judged by price alone. Buyers should also consider the quality, credibility, climate impact, transparency, and wider environmental and social benefits associated with the project.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

25/08/2026

📚 LESSON 67: AVOIDING DOUBLE COUNTING

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Double counting occurs when the same greenhouse gas emission reduction or carbon removal is counted more than once. This can happen when multiple parties claim the same climate benefit, potentially making the environmental impact of carbon credits appear greater than it actually is.

Avoiding double counting is essential for maintaining trust and integrity in carbon markets. A carbon credit should represent a specific climate benefit that is uniquely identified, tracked, and accounted for throughout its lifecycle. Once a credit is retired, it should not be available for another buyer or purpose.

Carbon registries play an important role in preventing double counting. They assign unique identification numbers to credits and record important information such as the project, quantity issued, ownership transfers, and retirement status. These records create a transparent trail that helps track each credit.

In Papua New Guinea, strong accounting systems are particularly important for forest, peatland, wetland, and mangrove projects. Clear records can help ensure that emission reductions from these ecosystems are not claimed simultaneously by different projects, buyers, or accounting systems.

Governments and project developers also need clear rules for how carbon reductions are accounted for against national climate targets. Proper coordination can help prevent the same emission reduction from being counted toward multiple climate commitments.

Preventing double counting protects the credibility of carbon credits and ensures that each unit represents a unique contribution to climate action.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

16/08/2026

📚 LESSON 66: UNDERSTANDING ADDITIONALITY

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Additionality is one of the most important concepts in determining whether a carbon credit represents genuine climate action. It asks a simple but critical question: Would the emission reduction or carbon removal have happened without the financial support provided by carbon credits?

If a project would have happened anyway, the resulting climate benefit may not be considered additional. In that situation, issuing carbon credits could overstate the amount of climate action achieved and weaken confidence in the carbon market.

For example, a forest protection project may require carbon finance to fund patrols, monitoring, community programs, alternative livelihoods, and long-term conservation activities. If the project would not be financially viable without carbon revenue, this can support the argument that its climate benefits are additional.

In Papua New Guinea, additionality can be particularly important for forest, peatland, wetland, mangrove, and sustainable land-management projects. Carbon finance can help make conservation economically viable while supporting communities and protecting ecosystems that might otherwise face increasing development pressures.

Project developers and independent auditors therefore need to examine financial conditions, legal requirements, common practices, investment barriers, and other evidence when assessing additionality. Strong documentation helps demonstrate that carbon finance is actually contributing to the project’s implementation.

Additionality protects the integrity of carbon markets. When credits represent climate benefits that would not otherwise have occurred, buyers can have greater confidence that their investment is supporting genuinely additional climate action.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

11/08/2026

📚 LESSON 65: UNDERSTANDING PERMANENCE

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Permanence refers to how long the carbon benefit created by a project is expected to remain in place. It is an important principle in carbon markets because carbon stored in forests, soils, wetlands, and other ecosystems can potentially be released again through fire, deforestation, drought, disease, or other disturbances.

For example, a forest conservation project may protect trees that store significant amounts of carbon. If those forests remain protected for many decades, the carbon can continue to be stored. However, if the forest is later destroyed, some of that stored carbon could return to the atmosphere.

Carbon standards therefore use different approaches to manage permanence risks. These can include long-term monitoring, legal protections, risk assessments, and buffer pools, where a portion of credits is reserved to help compensate for unexpected carbon losses.

In Papua New Guinea, permanence is particularly important for projects involving tropical forests, peatlands, wetlands, and mangroves. Protecting these ecosystems over the long term requires effective land management, community participation, monitoring, and appropriate safeguards.

Strong permanence measures help ensure that carbon projects deliver benefits beyond the initial crediting period. They also give buyers greater confidence that the climate benefits associated with purchased credits will remain protected over time.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

04/08/2026

📚 LESSON 64: WHAT MAKES A CREDIT HIGH QUALITY

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Not all carbon credits are created equal. A high-quality carbon credit represents a real, measurable, and independently verified reduction or removal of greenhouse gas emissions. Strong quality standards help ensure that every credit delivers genuine environmental benefits and maintains confidence in carbon markets.

A high-quality credit should be additional, meaning the project would not have happened without carbon finance. It should also be permanent, ensuring that the carbon benefits are maintained over the long term. Regular monitoring and independent verification further confirm that the project’s results remain accurate and transparent.

Another important principle is preventing double counting. Each carbon credit should only be issued once, sold once, and retired once. Public carbon registries help track every credit throughout its lifecycle, ensuring transparency and preventing multiple claims for the same emission reduction.

In Papua New Guinea, high-quality carbon projects can protect tropical forests, peatlands, wetlands, and mangroves while delivering meaningful benefits to local communities. Projects that combine strong environmental outcomes with social and economic development are more likely to attract international buyers and long-term investment.

High-quality carbon credits strengthen the integrity of global carbon markets. By supporting projects that meet rigorous standards, buyers can contribute to credible climate action while helping protect nature, improve livelihoods, and advance sustainable development.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

28/07/2026

📚 LESSON 63: FROM MEASUREMENT TO ISSUANCE

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Carbon credits are not created instantly. Before they can be issued, every project must follow a structured process to prove that real greenhouse gas emissions have been reduced, avoided, or removed. This ensures that every carbon credit represents a genuine climate benefit.

The process begins with measuring the project’s environmental impact using approved methodologies. Developers collect data, establish a baseline, monitor project performance, and calculate the amount of emissions reduced or carbon stored over a specific period.

Once the measurements are complete, independent third-party auditors verify the results. They review project documents, monitoring records, field data, and supporting evidence to confirm that the reported emission reductions are accurate, transparent, and comply with international carbon standards.

In Papua New Guinea, projects involving forests, peatlands, wetlands, and mangroves must undergo the same rigorous process. Reliable measurement and independent verification help demonstrate that these ecosystems are delivering measurable climate benefits while supporting biodiversity and local communities.

After successful verification, the approved carbon credits are issued by an accredited carbon registry and recorded in a public database. These credits can then be traded, transferred, or retired by buyers to support their climate commitments.

A transparent journey from measurement to issuance strengthens confidence in carbon markets and ensures that every carbon credit contributes to meaningful and credible climate action.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

20/07/2026

📚 LESSON 62: WHY INDEPENDENT CHECKS ARE KEY

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Independent checks are essential for maintaining trust and credibility in carbon markets. Before carbon credits can be issued, a project’s emission reductions or carbon removals must be reviewed by qualified third-party auditors. Their role is to confirm that the project follows approved methodologies and produces genuine climate benefits.

These auditors examine project documents, monitoring records, calculations, and supporting evidence. They verify that the reported results are accurate, measurable, and comply with internationally recognized carbon standards. This process helps prevent errors, overestimation, double counting, and misleading environmental claims.

In Papua New Guinea, independent verification is particularly important because many projects involve vast forests, wetlands, peatlands, and mangroves across remote landscapes. Auditors may combine field inspections, satellite imagery, drone technology, and geographic information systems (GIS) to assess project performance and validate reported outcomes.

Independent verification also increases confidence among investors, governments, businesses, and local communities. It demonstrates that carbon credits represent real and measurable climate benefits, making them more attractive in international carbon markets and helping attract climate finance into Papua New Guinea.

Without independent checks, carbon markets would struggle to maintain transparency and integrity. Strong verification ensures every carbon credit is supported by reliable evidence, strengthening market confidence while promoting sustainable development and long-term environmental conservation.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

13/07/2026

📚 LESSON 61: HOW PROJECTS ARE MEASURED

Stage 2 – Carbon Credit Basics

Carbon projects must be measured carefully to ensure that the climate benefits they claim are real and quantifiable. The process begins by establishing a baseline scenario—an estimate of the emissions that would occur if the project did not exist. The project’s actual emissions or carbon removals are then monitored over time and compared with this baseline.

Project developers use approved methodologies that specify what data to collect and how to calculate emission reductions. Measurements may include field surveys, satellite imagery, fuel consumption records, electricity generation data, or soil and vegetation sampling, depending on the project type.

In Papua New Guinea, technologies such as remote sensing and community-based monitoring can help track changes in forests, wetlands, and mangroves across large and diverse landscapes. Accurate measurement not only supports the issuance of credible carbon credits but also helps guide effective conservation and land management.

After monitoring, independent experts verify the results before credits are issued. This rigorous approach builds confidence that each carbon credit represents a genuine and measurable climate benefit.

🌐 Learn more: www.sepikwpl.com

Sepik Wetlands & Peatlands Limited

16/09/2026

06/09/2026

01/09/2026

25/08/2026

16/08/2026

11/08/2026

04/08/2026

28/07/2026

20/07/2026

13/07/2026

Address

Opening Hours

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request

Monday	09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday	09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday	09:00 - 17:00
Thursday	09:00 - 17:00
Friday	09:00 - 17:00