23/05/2026
They say imitation is the highest form of flattery. Ahem. Blush. Thank you.
So yes, we noticed the new flyer around Wai-o-Taiki Bay using some very familiar words. We love that there’s some discussion being had.
We also noticed our flyer was taken down and replaced by the new flyer. There was, and always is, room for both — and space for more than one view to sit side by side. We still hope that’s how great communities work.
The new flyer says that access and the environment are “not mutually exclusive.” We agree. That’s already true here.
That’s what makes Wai-o-Taiki Bay special: kids on bikes, people walking, prams, playgrounds, birds, mangroves, muddy shoes, shortcuts, slow walks, a picnic at the top of the nature reserve looking out over Tāmaki Estuary and along to Tāhuna Tōrea, and the last bits of wild coastal edge, all in the same place.
Access to the wild — and the very well-paved — is already here.
Our neighbourhood is wrapped in a multi-million-dollar network of shared paths, cycleways, and footpaths connecting us to Tāmaki Path, Glen Innes, the Eastern Bays, Tāhuna Tōrea Nature Reserve, nearby playgrounds, and far beyond. Fernwood Playground sits right in the middle of these existing residential and transit routes and is already publicly listed as wheelchair and pram accessible.
So there’s no debate about public access. It’s a fair question about how and why Auckland Council / Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board are progressing $4.7m of new concrete through a long-standing nature reserve and crucial avifauna habitat to enable a slightly shorter parallel route to a playground people can already access.
The flyer says the project will provide “safer, more inclusive access while protecting the environment.” That sounds lovely. We would like it to be true.
We don’t know who researched and wrote the flyer, but they seem confident about the project’s purpose, funding and environmental protections. If they have found the official public plans, ecological assessments, funding records and cost-benefit analysis showing how excavating and concreting the nature reserve protects it better than using the existing funded accessways, we sincerely invite them to share those links in the comments. We’ll happily read them. We may even print them and put them back on the nature reserve works sign.
Which is the slightly awkward bit.
The last many residents heard, this was a “Tāmaki Greenway” proposal back in 2017. It went to consultation, and the Wai-o-Taiki nature reserve path was halted by Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board after community feedback. Yet the proposal did move along — renamed, reframed, and advanced — without current residents being shown the public notification of this change, the original consultation feedback, approved plan, consistent and complete policy compliance trail, authority-to-proceed record, or evidence that the project meets Council’s requirements for prudent use of public money.
It has now re-emerged as Auckland Council’s Tāmaki Path - Stage 2: an almost $5m shovel-ready works programme already underway. Since 2017, the new resident population of Wai-o-Taiki Bay has grown significantly, and they bring their ideas, voices and needs too. Yet Auckland Council has not offered them an opportunity to review the plan, be consulted, or have their feedback considered and reflected in a final, fit-for-purpose plan that shows prudent use of public money.
Right now, Auckland Council is running an open, visible and accessible consultation process for Maybury Reserve — less than a three-minute bike ride from the nature reserve — through . Good. That’s what real public engagement looks like.
So we’re wondering: where was the community consultation process for Tāmaki Path Stage 2 through Wai-o-Taiki Bay Nature Reserve? Nine years between the only public consultation, a halted proposal, and works now underway is a long time in policy, public-land and infrastructure development.
The flyer also points people to an Auckland Council website link and says to search “Tāmaki Shared Path - Stage 2” there and on . We tried. We still couldn’t find a working public project page, approved plan, environmental assessment, funding record, or compliance trail for the nature reserve works.
If those public pages and records exist, please share the links in the comments. We’ll happily read them.
Different views are always welcome. Anonymous claims are not public records, and we’ve already asked for the records.
Auckland Council, Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board, Mayor Wayne Brown — please explain the $4,706,518.65 bill.
Speaking of bills and rates ... SpoonBill highly rates MC Hammersmith