10/05/2026
Mark Galeotti: "The Russian security system is carefully organised to minimise the risk of a coup. Various military and paramilitary forces balance each other, and the FSO is packed with loyalists and empowered to monitor whomever it feels it must.
While Yevgeny Prigozhin and his Wagner mercenaries did turn in 2023, this was a mutiny, not a coup: the goal was not to topple the president but to persuade him to abandon his support for Shoigu. In any case, the 2,000 or so men who neared Moscow would have had no chance of taking the city, let alone ousting Putin.
Presenting Shoigu as a particular putschist is especially laughable. Fairly or not, he has faced the brunt of criticism within the military for the bungled initial invasion and subsequent failures of leadership, strategy and supply. There has been a comprehensive campaign to sack, prosecute or dismiss his cronies within the ministry. Those officers with whom he was associated, including Chief of the General Staff Gerasimov, whom he appointed, have pointedly disassociated themselves from him.
It is hard to impossible to imagine that he has the authority and credibility within the high command to stage a coup, let alone the freedom of operation to do so without coming to the attention of the informants, wiretaps and email interceptions of DVKR, the Federal Security Service’s Military Counterintelligence Department. Name notwithstanding, it is there more to snoop on the soldiers than protect them from foreign spies.
Besides, those claims about Putin’s security which can be externally validated look distinctly questionable. Contrary to the claims, for example, Putin – who for years has been cutting back on travel and public engagements round the country – has maintained a programme of public events, including his recent meeting with the Iranian foreign minister in St Petersburg.
This may be more dodgy intelligence, coming as it does after a Swedish report that dramatically overstated the pressure on the Russian economy. There is a desperate appetite in Europe for a deus ex machina, for some miraculous end to the Ukraine war. The thought of Putin being toppled by a coup or the country imploding certainly fits the bill. This would hardly be the first time intelligence agencies succumbed to the temptation to provide their masters with what they want, not need, to hear.
Yet with the news that Nato has been meeting with film and television producers in the hope of influencing their output, it is also worth bearing in mind that this may be a deliberate deception. Maybe the idea is to put thoughts into people’s minds. Maybe it is to get Putin to turn on Shoigu, who is a personal friend, and get the rest of the elite wondering if they might be next. This would hardly be the first time we have seen such misdirection in the covert shadow wars waged by the spooks."
It is hard to impossible to imagine that Sergei Shoigu has the authority and credibility within the high command to stage a coup