10/09/2026
🗣️ YOFCI THURSDAY CONVERSATION
WHEN POLITICS GETS PERSONAL
Last week, we asked what keeps women from getting into politics.
This week, let’s take the conversation one step further:
What happens when a woman actually gets into politics?
Getting to the table may be one challenge.
Being at the table can be another.
Political criticism is part of democracy. Candidates should be questioned about their policies, decisions, competence, leadership and performance.
But research on women in Nigerian politics shows that criticism can sometimes move beyond politics and become deeply personal.
A recent study analysed over 140,000 posts on X between 2022 and 2025 targeting women in Nigerian politics, alongside interviews with women politicians and political-party officials. (premiumtimesng.com)
The research found recurring attacks focused on women’s:
🔹 Competence
🔹 Appearance
🔹 Personality
🔹 Morality
🔹 Sexuality
The attacks also included sexist slurs, sexualised abuse, smear campaigns, cyberstalking, doxxing and threats of r**e and murder to delegitimise women political candidates.
What makes this even more interesting is that the nature of the attacks changed throughout the electoral process.
Before campaigns: competence was frequently questioned.
During elections: gender stereotypes became more prominent.
After elections: moral attacks and smear campaigns increased. (premiumtimesng.com)
So perhaps the conversation shouldn’t stop at:
“Would you vote for a woman?”
We should also ask:
“How do we treat women once they enter the political arena?”
Because a woman can be challenged without being degraded.
Her policies can be questioned without attacking her appearance.
Her decisions can be criticised without questioning her morality.
Her leadership can be scrutinised without turning her personal life into political ammunition.
And this isn’t about giving women a free pass.
Women in politics should be held accountable.
The question is whether that accountability is based on the same things we expect from every politician; their ideas, decisions, competence, character and performance or whether gender adds another layer to how they are judged.
So, let’s talk.
Where do you draw the line between political criticism and gender-based abuse?
And perhaps more importantly:
Can we disagree with a woman in politics without making her gender part of the argument?
👇🏽 What do you think?