17/09/2026
Throwback Thursday: Then vs. Now ๐ข๐ป
The 9-to-5 office job โ Remote/hybrid work
THEN (1970sโ1980s):
In the 1970s, most office workers had to commute to a central office, clock in at a fixed time, and work only from their assigned desk. Typewriters, landlines, and paper files were the norm. โWorking from homeโ was almost unheard of for the average employee. Work was measured by presence at a desk, not output. Decent work meant stability, but flexibility was rare. ๐ขโ
NOW (2020s):
Millions of people work remotely or in a hybrid model, using laptops, cloud software, and video calls. Work is more flexible, location-independent, and often measured by output rather than hours at a desk. Talent pools are wider, and some workers have better work-life balance. But not everyone has this privilege; many jobs cannot go remote, and remote work can blur boundaries or lack protections. ๐ปโ ๏ธ
However, new policies and practices such as right-to-disconnect laws, hybrid work guidelines, and digital labour protections offer real hope if properly implemented and enforced.
The lesson for employers and policymakers:
Flexible work can support decent work and economic growth, but only if it comes with fair pay, safe conditions, clear contracts, and equal opportunities. Flexibility should not become invisibility or exploitation. Decent work is not charity; it is the true foundation of economic growth. ๐ค
Let us build an economy where every worker is seen, safe, and valued whether in an office, at home, or on a hybrid schedule.
Drop a ๐ป if you believe flexible work must still be decent work. ๐