马大新青年 (UMANY)

马大新青年 (UMANY) 馬大新青年(University of Malaya Association of New Youth)是一個學運組織,自2001

谢谢各位新生的热情支持,我们的“马大新青年26/27新生群(一)”已满。还没进到我们的群组的新生们不要担心,我们开了多个新生群。还没入群的新生们欢迎加入我们的“马大新青年26/27新生群(二)”!🔗群组链接https://chat.what...
15/08/2026

谢谢各位新生的热情支持,我们的“马大新青年26/27新生群(一)”已满。

还没进到我们的群组的新生们不要担心,我们开了多个新生群。

还没入群的新生们欢迎加入我们的“马大新青年26/27新生群(二)”!

🔗群组链接
https://chat.whatsapp.com/DUMOmPS6NQjFVH9E7sQfkF?s=cl&p=a&ilr=1

校园自主 学生自治
马大新青年

Kenyataan Media UMANY: MANSUH AUKU, KEMENANGAN MAHASISWAUMANY: Langkah Positif, Namun Pemantauan Mesti DiteruskanUMANY m...
15/08/2026

Kenyataan Media UMANY: MANSUH AUKU, KEMENANGAN MAHASISWA

UMANY: Langkah Positif, Namun Pemantauan Mesti Diteruskan

UMANY mengambil pendirian berhati-hati terhadap pengumuman Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim bahawa kerajaan akan memansuhkan Akta Universiti dan Kolej Universiti 1971 (AUKU).

Walau bagaimanapun, bagi gerakan mahasiswa Malaysia, ini tidak dapat dinafikan merupakan satu perkembangan yang bersejarah dan kemenangan besar hasil perjuangan berterusan generasi demi generasi pemimpin mahasiswa yang tidak pernah berhenti memperjuangkan gagasan "Demokrasi Kampus, Autonomi Mahasiswa".

AUKU telah lama dianggap oleh gerakan mahasiswa sebagai salah satu belenggu institusi utama yang menyekat demokrasi kampus, pemerintahan kendiri mahasiswa dan kebebasan akademik. Walaupun kerajaan-kerajaan terdahulu, termasuk kerajaan MADANI, telah beberapa kali meminda peruntukan berkaitan, sekatan institusi yang dihadapi mahasiswa, campur tangan pentadbiran universiti serta budaya konservatif yang telah lama berakar dalam kampus tidak pernah benar-benar lenyap hanya melalui pindaan tersebut.

Berkenaan dengan hasrat Perdana Menteri Anwar Ibrahim untuk memansuhkan AUKU, kami ingin menegaskan bahawa ini merupakan hasil perjuangan gerakan mahasiswa yang terkumpul selama bertahun-tahun, bukannya suatu pemberian atau ihsan yang diberikan secara sepihak oleh mana-mana kerajaan kepada mahasiswa.

UMANY menggesa kerajaan supaya mengumumkan garis masa bagi pemansuhan AUKU, proses perundangan yang akan dilaksanakan serta pelan menyeluruh untuk menggantikan kerangka sedia ada.

Kerajaan juga mesti memastikan bahawa organisasi mahasiswa, ahli akademik, warga universiti dan masyarakat sivil diberikan ruang penyertaan yang bermakna sepanjang proses tersebut dan bukannya membiarkan masa depan mahasiswa serta universiti ditentukan secara tertutup oleh sistem birokrasi.

UMANY ingin mengingatkan kerajaan bahawa ketika pindaan AUKU dilakukan sebelum ini, kerajaan pernah menyatakan bahawa autonomi kewangan yang lebih besar akan diberikan kepada organisasi mahasiswa, termasuk Majlis Perwakilan Pelajar.

Namun sehingga hari ini, tahap pelaksanaan reformasi tersebut masih berbeza-beza antara univer

UMANY STATEMENT : Abolish UUCA Is A Victory for StudentsUMANY: Welcome with Caution, Continued Scrutiny Is EssentialUMAN...
15/08/2026

UMANY STATEMENT : Abolish UUCA Is A Victory for Students

UMANY: Welcome with Caution, Continued Scrutiny Is Essential

UMANY takes a cautious view of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s announcement that the government will repeal the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 (UUCA).
Nevertheless, for Malaysia’s student movement, this is undoubtedly a historic development. More importantly, it represents a significant victory achieved through the persistent struggle of generations of student movement leaders who have continued to advance the principle of “Campus Democracy, Student Autonomy.”

For more than half a century, UUCA has been regarded by the student movement as one of the key institutional restraints on campus democracy, student self-governance and academic freedom. Although successive governments, including the government led by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, have amended its provisions on several occasions, the institutional restrictions faced by students, administrative interference by university authorities and the deeply entrenched conservative culture within campuses have never completely disappeared merely as a result of legislative amendments.

In response to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s stated intention to repeal UUCA, we emphasise that this is the result of years of accumulated struggle by the student movement, and not a gift or favour unilaterally granted to students by any government.

UMANY urges the government to immediately announce a clear timeline for the repeal of UUCA, outline the legislative process involved and present a comprehensive framework to replace the existing system.

The government must also ensure that student organisations, academics, university staff and civil society are given meaningful opportunities to participate throughout the process, rather than allowing the future of students and universities to be decided behind closed doors by the bureaucracy.

We remind the government that during previous amendments to UUCA, the government had claimed that greater financial autonomy would be granted to student organisations, including Student Representative Councils.

However, to this day, the implementation of these reforms remains uneven across universities. Some student organisations continue to face cumbersome administrative procedures and restrictions imposed by university power structures in areas such as financial management, fundraising and approval of activities.
In June 2026, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) also initiated disciplinary investigations against two students who participated in a solidarity action supporting protesting villagers, pursuant to the Universities and University Colleges (Universiti Malaysia Sabah) (Discipline of Students) Rules 2024.
UMANY stresses that the passage of reforms in Parliament does not mean that those reforms will automatically be implemented on university campuses.
Conservative forces, bureaucracy and administrative inertia that have long existed within the university system may delay, narrow or even hollow out reforms that are progressive in principle during the implementation process.
If the government merely removes the name “UUCA” while allowing the same culture of control, power structures and administrative mechanisms that restrict students to continue in other forms, then the so-called “repeal of UUCA” will ultimately remain nothing more than reform on paper.
UMANY calls on all institutions of higher learning nationwide to respond to the government’s reform direction by immediately reviewing and withdrawing all disciplinary actions, investigations and other measures taken against students for expressing their views, participating in peaceful assemblies, organising activities, engaging in public issues or exercising their fundamental rights as citizens.
Since the government itself has acknowledged that the existing legal framework needs to be abolished, university administrations should no longer continue to treat students through the same outdated culture of control.
At the same time, we call upon student organisations, student movements, civil society groups and all social forces that have long advocated for higher education reform to welcome this announcement while continuing to maintain their independence and scrutinise the government.
The goal of the student movement has never been merely to repeal a single law. It is to establish a higher education system that genuinely respects student rights, university autonomy and academic freedom.
UMANY was also previously a member of the Committee to Abolish UUCA. The position we advocated at the time was never simply to remove UUCA from the statute books.
Rather, we called for UUCA to be replaced by a new Higher Education Act founded upon the values of freedom, one that would redefine the relationship between the state, universities and students, and ultimately realise the true principle of “Campus Autonomy, Student Democracy.”

废除大专法令属学生胜利马大新青年:谨慎看待持续监督马大新青年谨慎看待首相安华宣布政府将废除《1971年大专法令》(AUKU)。无论如何,对于马来西亚学生运动而言,这无疑是一项具有历史意义的进展,更是我国一代又一代学运领袖坚持抗争、不断推动【...
15/08/2026

废除大专法令属学生胜利
马大新青年:谨慎看待持续监督

马大新青年谨慎看待首相安华宣布政府将废除《1971年大专法令》(AUKU)。

无论如何,对于马来西亚学生运动而言,这无疑是一项具有历史意义的进展,更是我国一代又一代学运领袖坚持抗争、不断推动【校园自主·学生自治】理念所取得的重要胜利。

《大专法令》实施超过半个世纪以来,长期被学生运动视为限制校园民主、学生自治与学术自由的重要制度枷锁。即使历届政府(包括首相安华所领导的政府)曾多次修改相关条文,学生所面对的制度性限制、校方行政干预,以及校园内长期形成的保守文化,却从未因为数次修法而完全消失。

针对首相安华表明废除《大专法令》的立场,我们强调:这是学运多年抗争累积下来的成果,而不是任何一个政府单方面给予学生的恩赐。

马大新青年促请政府尽快公布废除《大专法令》的具体时间表、立法程序以及取代现有制度的完整方案,并确保整个过程让学生组织、学者、大学教职员及公民社会充分参与,而不是由官僚体系闭门决定学生与大学的未来。

我们提醒政府,过去修改《大专法令》时,政府曾宣称将进一步赋予学生组织,包括学生代表理事会更大的财务自主权。然而时至今日,相关改革在各大学的落实程度依然参差不齐,一些学生组织在财务管理、筹款、活动审批等方面,仍然受到繁复行政程序与校方权力结构的限制。

2026年6月,沙巴大学更依据《2024年大学及大学学院条例(马来西亚沙巴大学)(学生纪律)》对参与声援村民抗议行动的两名学生展开纪律调查。

新青年强调:国会通过改革,不代表改革就会自动在校园落地。

大学体制内部长期存在的保守势力、官僚主义与行政惯性,都可能让原本进步的改革在执行过程中被拖延、收窄甚至架空。

若政府只是废除《大专法令》的名称,却让原有的管制思维、权力结构及限制学生的行政机制以其他形式继续存在,那么“废除大专法令”,最终只是纸上谈兵。

马大新青年要求,全国各大专学府应该响应政府废除《大专法令》的改革方向,立即检讨并撤回所有针对学生因表达意见、和平集会、组织活动、参与公共议题及行使基本公民权利而采取的纪律处分、调查及其他对付行动。

既然政府已经承认现有法律框架需要被废除,那么大学行政体系更不应该继续以旧有的管制思维对待学生。

与此同时,我们呼吁全国学生组织、学运团体、公民社会及所有长期关注高教改革的社会力量,在欢迎今天这项宣布之余,继续保持独立与监督政府的姿态。

学运的目标从来不只是废除一部法令,而是建立一个真正尊重学生权利、大学自主与学术自由的高等教育制度。

马大新青年过去也曾是“废除大专法令委员会”的成员之一。我们当年所提出的主张,从来不只是简单地将AUKU从法律条文中删除,而是主张以一部全新倡导自由价值观的《高等教育法令》取而代之,重新建立国家、大学与学生之间的关系,落实真正的“校园自主,学生自治“。

校园自主,学生自治
马大新青年

Jika Bersuara Perlu Menanggung Akibat , Berapa Banyak Ruang Yang Masih Kita Ada?UMANY memandang serius penyerahan notis ...
11/08/2026

Jika Bersuara Perlu Menanggung Akibat , Berapa Banyak Ruang Yang Masih Kita Ada?

UMANY memandang serius penyerahan notis siasatan ke atas Setiausaha Agung Liga Mahasiswa Malaysia, Saudara Adam Raiyan, yang dijadualkan hadir ke Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah (IPD) Brickfields, Kuala Lumpur pada 18 Ogos 2026. Siasatan tersebut dijalankan di bawah Seksyen 506 Kanun Keseksaan serta Seksyen 233 Akta Komunikasi dan Multimedia 1998.

Sekiranya seorang mahasiswa yang tidak melakukan apa-apa kesalahan terpaksa berhadapan dengan siasatan hanya disebabkan identiti, pendirian, atau penglibatannya dalam isu awam, maka jika hari ini Adam Raiyan yang dipersoalkan, tidak mustahil esok setiap mahasiswa akan dipaksa untuk terus membisu. Universiti tidak sepatutnya sekadar menjadi tempat menimba ilmu, sebaliknya ia harus menjadi ruang bagi anak muda belajar berfikir secara kritis, membincangkan isu-isu awam, serta melibatkan diri dalam masyarakat.

Berdepan dengan pandangan yang berbeza, apa yang benar-benar diperlukan oleh masyarakat bukanlah pembungkaman, malah ruang untuk setiap pandangan didengari dan dibincangkan secara rasional di bawah kerangka undang-undang serta hak-hak sivil.

UMANY membantah sekeras-kerasnya sebarang bentuk intimidasi, gangguan, dan tekanan yang tidak wajar. Kami turut menyeru seluruh lapisan masyarakat agar memberikan kefahaman serta ruang perbincangan yang sewajarnya kepada golongan muda dan mahasiswa apabila berhadapan dengan pandangan mereka yang berbeza. Sebuah masyarakat yang matang tidak seharusnya takut akan soalan-soalan daripada anak muda; sebuah sistem demokrasi yang berdaya tahan juga tidak patut merasa terancam hanya kerana wujudnya suara yang berbeza. Persoalan yang dibangkitkan oleh mahasiswa hari ini mungkin merupakan cabaran yang bakal dihadapi oleh masyarakat pada masa hadapan.

UMANY akan terus memantau perkembangan kes ini dan berdiri teguh bersama Saudara Adam Raiyan. Ini kerana universiti tidak sepatutnya mengajar kita untuk berdiam diri, sebaliknya mengajar kita bagaimana untuk berkata-kata dengan berasas, berfakta, dan berani.
UMANY

假改革,真禁锢?马大新青年敦促政府撤回《资讯自由法案》针对于7月13日在国会下议院所提呈一读的《2026年资讯自由法案》,马大新青年认为,该法案不仅未能保障人民享有更充分、更透明的资讯获取权,反而可能进一步限制人民依法获取公共资讯的空间。因...
08/08/2026

假改革,真禁锢?马大新青年敦促政府撤回《资讯自由法案》

针对于7月13日在国会下议院所提呈一读的《2026年资讯自由法案》,马大新青年认为,该法案不仅未能保障人民享有更充分、更透明的资讯获取权,反而可能进一步限制人民依法获取公共资讯的空间。因此,马大新青年敦促政府撤回现有版本的《2026年资讯自由法案》,并在经过国会特别遴选委员会的讨论进行相应修改才再次提呈国会。

《资讯自由法》的核心精神,理应是保障人民依法获取公共资讯的基本权利,以公开为原则、保密为例外,让人民能够监督政府施政、追踪公共资源流向,进而强化政府问责、遏止贪腐。这也是许多民主国家推动资讯自由立法的初衷。

其一,《资讯自由法》,听上去是让人民对每件事能有更多的知情权,但实质上并没有给予人民获取资讯的权利。它并没有承认资讯获取权属于人民的基本权利。 真正合理且符合国际标准的资讯自由法,应当以公开为原则、保密为例外,并确保只有在涉及国家安全或重大公共利益时,政府才能依法限制资讯公开。然而本法却主张保密,让公开变成例外,这与立法名称背道而驰。此外,应是所有公共机构主动公开公共资讯并非等待人民的申请。对于被拒绝公开的资讯,申请人应有权向独立审查机构提出上诉,以确保不会遭到无理拒绝。

其二,政府声称推动改革,却仍保留《官方机密法令》(Official Secrets Act 1972 或简称为OSA)的优先地位。 这导致了任何资讯只要被视为机密文件,人民仍然无法获得任何相关信息。此法案并没有为人民起到任何实质性帮助,反而是给机密制度披上了“合法”的外衣。资讯自由法的优先级应高过其他法案才能保障民众的知情权。

其三,此法案严重削弱了人民的知情权。知情权应是人民本就拥有的权利并非是政府赏赐给人民的恩惠。人民缴税、人民推选政府,公共机构依法持有的资讯,本质上应服务于公共利益,而人民理应享有依法获取相关资讯的权利。人民可基于这些资讯去监督政府是否履行了他们的义务。没有知情权、没有监督,民主社会就失去了意义。然而,在此法案中人民需要付出成本,如金钱与时间,高申请成本降低了人民行使知情权的意愿,而漫长的等待时间则削弱了知情权的实际效力。

其四,不利于反贪污的行动。人民、记者、甚至是各阶层人士都可以要求政府公开拨款金额、采购内容、各类开销、拨款目的等等。但如果这些资讯都可以被视为机密文件,拒绝向大众公开,政府是否能确保不会有贪污的行为,又如何向人民保证这些金钱的流向是为了推动国家发展。当人民无法查阅公共资金的流向时,政府的问责机制便会被削弱,而贪污与滥权也更容易滋生。例如法案的第13至17条将监督与争议解决交由“监察使”(Ombudsman)负责,但其受制于政府体制,缺乏任命与财政上的完全独立性。

马大新青年主张,资讯遭拒时,申请人应有权向独立审查机构上诉。政府应设立直接向国会负责的独立资讯委员会,确保其任命、行政与财政不受政府干预,并赋予其查阅档案、强制公开资料及作出具法律约束力裁决的权力。

这项法案影响的不会是个别单位而是我们每一个人。从大学生关心高教拨款、家长关注校园建设,到居民关心地方发展规划,资讯公开关系着社会各阶层的切身利益。 此法案不是针对于某个群体的法案而是每一个人的法案。新青年并非反对制定《资讯自由法》,我们反对的是一部无法真正保障资讯自由的《资讯自由法》。

改革,从来不是增加一部法律这么简单,而是建立一个更透明、更开放、更负责任的治理制度。若一项法律无法扩大人民的权利、强化政府的问责、提升公共透明度,它便难以称得上是真正的改革。

在此,马大新青年再次敦促政府广泛听取公民社会、媒体、法律界、学术界及各利益相关方的意见,重新审视《2026年资讯自由法案》,并确保法案真正保障人民的知情权,而非进一步限制人民获取公共资讯的空间。唯有建立透明、开放且负责任的政府,人民才能真正参与民主监督,国家改革也才能赢得社会的信任与支持。我们支持资讯自由,我们反对的是一个名为资讯自由、实则限制资讯自由的法案。

2026年4月14日晚上8时至10时,马大新青年、隆雪华青与 Projek SAMA 联合主办地方选举分享会,主题为《空降的市长:吉隆坡市长应该由谁来选?》。在本次分享会中,主讲人黄进发教授指出,地方选举的本质,就是在问「谁才是老板」。一个...
08/08/2026

2026年4月14日晚上8时至10时,马大新青年、隆雪华青与 Projek SAMA 联合主办地方选举分享会,主题为《空降的市长:吉隆坡市长应该由谁来选?》。

在本次分享会中,主讲人黄进发教授指出,地方选举的本质,就是在问「谁才是老板」。

一个国家的本质,是拥有合法使用强制力的权利,例如征税。那谁才是掌控这个权利的主宰呢?换句话说,如果政府可以收你的钱、管你的生活,那你是不是有权决定让谁来管你?你出钱,就该有选择权。

民主的本质不在于投票,而是在于让被管理者决定管理者。如果你不能决定谁管你,那「交税」和「被强制收钱」本质上没有差别。简单来说,买单的人,有权点餐;你买单了却没权点餐,和被抢钱没有分别。

政府有权征税,但并非天生就是圣人。民主的前提,不是相信人性本善,而是不相信权力不会被滥用,所以才需要民主的出现。

分享会也进一步点出吉隆坡目前所面对的问题。吉隆坡市长并非民选,而是由中央政府直接任命。这会导致什么样的后果呢?市长是对上级负责,而不是对人民负责。换言之,市长只需要让上级满意,而不必真正回应人民的需求。

就像官员需要向上级负责,因为是上级聘请他们;而民选代表则需要向选民负责,因为他们的权力是人民用选票赋予的。所以,问题并不是「人好不好」,而是他要服务的是谁、要向谁负责、要听谁的话。

当然,民主并非完美。选民可能会不理性、投票率可能不高、政党也可能操控候选人。民主并不能百分之百选出最好的人执政,但它能够防止最坏的情况出现。

此外,地方选举也意味着权力会被分散,政策可能变得更加复杂。不仅如此,中央政府也担心会「失控」。他们并非不知道民主的好,而是不想放权。

地方选举并非因为它完美,而是因为权力一定会被滥用,而地方选举可以让权力更难被滥用。如果政府要求人民交税、守规则、接受管理,那么人民至少应该拥有一项最基本的权力,那就是决定由谁来管理自己。

抨击政府言行不一决而不行,马大新青年促高教部即刻落实统考生入读本地大学政策针对高教部至今仍未落实“统考生凭SPM成绩报读公立大学中文相关科系”之政策,导致符合资格的独中生申请无门,马大新青年在此表达强烈不满,并严厉谴责政府言行不一、漠视青年...
31/07/2026

抨击政府言行不一决而不行,马大新青年促高教部即刻落实统考生入读本地大学政策

针对高教部至今仍未落实“统考生凭SPM成绩报读公立大学中文相关科系”之政策,导致符合资格的独中生申请无门,马大新青年在此表达强烈不满,并严厉谴责政府言行不一、漠视青年升学权益的官僚作风。

在7月13日,董总发文告对统考生至今仍无法报读本地公立大学表达极度失望,直批高教部行政怠慢是“只闻楼梯响,不见人下来”。同时,华总会长林家全亦公开抨击,内阁虽已通过相关议决,却遭到相关部门“冷处理”。

内阁早于今年5月中旬就已议决,允许统考生凭藉统考成绩附加SPM马来文优等及历史及格,报读国内3所公立大学的4项中文相关科系。

高教部原定于今年6月30日开放申请,如今近一个月过去,申请系统不仅毫无下文,甚至连最基本的申请机制与细节都未曾公布。这种“议而决、决而不行”的作风,彻底暴露了相关官员办事效率低下、缺乏前瞻性规划,以及将教育承诺当成口号的丑陋嘴脸。

政府这种拖延政务的作风严重打乱了青年的升学规划,是极度不负责任的表现。升学路线的规划关乎青年学子的未来,政府明明已在内阁层面通过决议,就应展现效率迅速落实,而非任由高教部无限期拖延,导致莘莘学子在漫长的等待中白白浪费宝贵的时间与升学机会,全盘升学计划与安排严重受阻。政府现在的“不作为”,无异于在阻碍本地人才的培养,许多学生在无奈之下退而求其次,这只会变相将优秀学子推向海外大学,造成国家严重的人才流失。

政府“表面宣布、实际反悔”的套路,完全是为了博取政治利益而忽悠人民的手段,这也严重伤害了国家公共行政问责制与国家机关的威信。马大新青年对此表达强烈反对,并主张拒绝将统考“政治工具化”,彻底还教育于教育。统考议题不应再沦为政治博弈的筹码,而必须回归到纯粹的教育与学术角度。正如《联邦宪法》第12条明确保障了国民享有平等的教育机会,任何人都不应因宗教、种族、血统或出生地而遭受歧视。政府口口声声提倡公平教育,但在实际行动上却对统考生的权益百般推诿,显然有违宪法精神。

此外,马大新青年认为本次改革绝不能仅仅止步于开放3所政府大学的4个中文相关科系,社会必须破除“中文科系迷思”,全面开放直接招生(Direct Intake)机制。统考作为一项国际学术水准极高的文凭,其含金量与课程严谨度早已获得全球众多顶尖大学的认可。认为独中生“只精通中文”是一种极其落后的刻板印象,统考课程同样涵盖了理科、商科及文科等专业领域,培养出来的学生具备全方位的学术能力。因此,政府未来应将统考文凭比照A-Level或澳洲预科班(AUSMAT)等国际文凭,允许统考生以直接招生的方式申请本地公立大学的所有科系,而非局限于中文科系。

同时,马大新青年极其清楚现有的大学中心单位(UPU)配额极其有限且竞争炽热。倘若直接将统考生纳入UPU系统,势必会导致本已处于弱势的大马高级教育文凭(STPM)考生面临更严峻的挤压,进而引发新的制度不公。为了兼顾整体教育体制的公平性,新青年主张统考生应通过公立大学的直接招生渠道入学,这样既能为统考生铺设合法的本地升学道路,同时也能捍卫STPM学生的权益,避免重蹈“制度内耗”的覆辙。

改革绝不能流于形式,更不能只做表面功夫。如果一项政策只是“纸上谈兵”,受害的永远是抱有希望的学生。马大新青年在此向高教部提出三项坚决要求。首先,高教部必须即刻兑现承诺,马上落实内阁议决,全面开放相关公立大学的中文相关科系供符合“统考加2”条件者申请。其次,当局必须立即透明地公布完整的录取时间线、审核机制及具体资格条件,还学生一个清晰明确的交代。最后,政府必须深化长远改革,在未来逐步扩大改革步伐,允许统考生通过直接招生方式报读公立大学的所有专业科系。

马大新青年

Fair Education Should Not Be Mere Lip Service — It Must Be Built Into the System28.7.2026 ,Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anw...
29/07/2026

Fair Education Should Not Be Mere Lip Service — It Must Be Built Into the System

28.7.2026 ,Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced at the Ministry of Education's monthly assembly that the Form Six programme will remain under the Ministry of Education for now, with its transfer to the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) put on hold. University of Malaya Association of New Youth (UMANY) urges the government to swiftly implement a policy to bring all pre-university programmes under unified MOHE management, and to establish a fair, transparent, and comparable university admission mechanism.
The Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM), commonly known as Form Six, is widely regarded as one of the most credible pre-university programmes in the country and deserves to be treated on equal footing with other pre-university pathways, with equal access to higher education opportunities. Yet STPM is generally seen as academically more demanding and more strictly graded; however, its students must still compete for limited places at public universities alongside candidates from other pre-university programmes with entirely different curricula and assessment standards. When students who have completed a more rigorous course of study risk losing university placement opportunities simply because of structural disparities, public confidence in educational fairness is inevitably undermined. Educational opportunity should be equal for all, and no one should face unfair treatment because of flaws in the system.
In fact, Anwar announced in January this year that MOHE would take over the pre-university education systems for both Form Six and the Matriculation Programme from that year onward, formally recognising students from both pathways as higher education students. In April, Higher Education Minister Dato' Seri Zambry stated that MOHE was finalising the relevant legal and administrative framework to implement this transfer of jurisdiction. These moves reflected the government's recognition of the long-standing structural gaps and resource shortfalls faced by Form Six students.
However, what deserves closer attention is the government's shifting policy direction on the status of Form Six. Less than six months later, today, Anwar announced at the Ministry of Education's monthly assembly that the transfer of the Form Six programme to MOHE would be put on hold, and that it would remain under the Ministry of Education. The reason given was that matters concerning the broader system and the teaching service framework needed to be brought back for further discussion. Such reversals in policy direction inevitably raise questions in society about the future planning for Form Six, and leave many Form Six students worried about whether the government has a clear, long-term roadmap for reform.
On the same day, Anwar announced an expansion of educational assistance for more than 30,000 Form Six students nationwide, granting them the same educational benefits and facilities as Form One to Form Five students in government schools. While this is certainly a step forward, parity in assistance does not equate to parity in the university admission system. What Form Six students truly care about is whether they can compete on equal footing with students from other pre-university programmes under a fair, transparent, and consistently applied mechanism.
What Form Six students hope for is not another round of policy announcements, but a stable, clearly defined, and durable set of institutional reforms. One that provides consistent, sustained policy support across curriculum positioning, resource allocation, and university admission mechanisms. Only then can educational fairness truly take root, rather than remaining a promise on paper.
UMANY therefore once again urges the government to swiftly implement a policy bringing all pre-university programmes under unified MOHE management, and to confront the long-standing inequities in the university admission system. MOHE should implement a unified admission system to ensure all students receive fair treatment. Only when fairness is built into the system can every student truly have the opportunity to shape their future through merit.

【欢迎了解马来亚大学 马大新青年在线为你解惑!】等待 UPU 成绩的你,是不是既期待又紧张?即将踏入大学,开启人生的新篇章,心中是否也有许多疑问?💬 我的科系需要准备什么?🏫 马大的校园环境怎么样?📚 选课、注册流程复杂吗?🚌 校园交通方便...
29/07/2026

【欢迎了解马来亚大学 马大新青年在线为你解惑!】

等待 UPU 成绩的你,是不是既期待又紧张?

即将踏入大学,开启人生的新篇章,心中是否也有许多疑问?

💬 我的科系需要准备什么?
🏫 马大的校园环境怎么样?
📚 选课、注册流程复杂吗?
🚌 校园交通方便吗?
🍜 哪里有便宜又好吃的美食?
🏠 宿舍生活是怎样的?

如果你也有这些疑问,别担心,因为这些问题,我们都曾经经历过。

因此,马大新青年特别设立新生交流群,希望陪伴每一位即将踏入马大的新生,顺利开启大学生活。

无论是学业、住宿、校园文化、社团活动,还是生活上的大小事,都欢迎你来询问。热心的学长姐将在线分享经验,为你解答疑惑,让你的大学第一步走得更加安心、更有方向。

【Get to Know Universiti Malaya with UMANY!】

Waiting for your UPU results? Feeling both excited and nervous about starting university?

As you prepare to embark on a brand-new chapter of your life, you may have plenty of questions on your mind.

💬 What should I prepare for my course?
🏫 What's the UM campus like?
📚 How do course registration and enrolment work?
🚌 Is transportation around campus convenient?
🍜 Where can I find affordable and delicious food?
🏠 What's hostel life like?

If you've been wondering about any of these, don't worry—we've been in your shoes before.

That's why UMANY has created a Freshmen Group to accompany and support every new student as they begin their journey at Universiti Malaya.

Whether you have questions about academics, accommodation, campus life, student societies or simply daily life in UM, our friendly seniors are here to share their experiences and help you settle in with confidence.

【Get to Know Universiti Malaya with UMANY!】

Waiting for your UPU results? Feeling both excited and nervous about starting university?

As you prepare to embark on a brand-new chapter of your life, you may have plenty of questions on your mind.

💬 What should I prepare for my course?
🏫 What's the UM campus like?
📚 How do course registration and enrolment work?
🚌 Is transportation around campus convenient?
🍜 Where can I find affordable and delicious food?
🏠 What's hostel life like?

If you've been wondering about any of these, don't worry—we've been in your shoes before.

That's why UMANY has created a Freshmen Group to accompany and support every new student as they begin their journey at Universiti Malaya.

Whether you have questions about academics, accommodation, campus life, student societies or simply daily life in UM, our friendly seniors are here to share their experiences and help you settle in with confidenc

Address

Petaling Jaya

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when 马大新青年 (UMANY) posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to 马大新青年 (UMANY):

Shortcuts

Share