02/02/2026
On the occasion of the Latvian launch of her book, Politics of Uncertainty, last Friday, historian Una Bergmane sat down with us to discuss the Baltic role in the end of the Cold War, moments when history could have gone differently, and why international norms matter:
▶️ When people think about the end of the Cold War, they often think of Berlin. Why look to the Baltics instead?
💬 The German story is an important part of the end of the Cold War, but it is only one of many. We understand history and each other better when we broaden the perspectives from which we view it, rather than limiting ourselves to big-power and imperial narratives.
▶️ Were there moments when the situation could have gone very differently?
💬 Yes. The Soviet attempt in January 1991 to stop the Baltic drive for independence by force was a key moment, when hardliners in Moscow were testing the possibility of a wider crackdown. If it had succeeded in the Baltic states, it likely would have marked the end of perestroika reforms across the USSR.
▶️ What surprised you most in your archival research?
💬 I was struck by how important the Baltic question was to major international players Washington, Bonn, Paris, London, and of course Moscow. And how surprisingly important for the West was the fact that they not recognised Baltic 1940 annexation by the USSR as legal.
▶️ What should readers take away from your book today?
💬 Sadly, it feels like my book describes a different world one that no longer exists. It was an imperfect world, but there was still more respect for international norms than there is today. Both Moscow and Washington at least wanted to appear committed to international law and human rights. The situation now is very different, but I hope readers come away remembering that what we are living through today is not normal and that we should, and can, strive for a return to normalcy.
📘 Interested in learning more? Get a free copy of the book by writing to [email protected].