11/08/2026
Is Sri Lanka's Social Security System Protecting Its Elderly?
Sri Lanka's population is ageing rapidly. In 1981, there were about one million people aged 60 and above, making up just 6.6% of the population. By 2012, that number had grown to 2.5 million (12.4%), and by 2031, it is expected to exceed 4.5 million—around one in every five Sri Lankans.
Traditionally, older people in Sri Lanka have relied on their families for financial and emotional support. However, smaller families, migration, and changing lifestyles mean that many elderly people can no longer depend on this support. At the same time, a shrinking working-age population is placing greater pressure on the country's economy and welfare system.
Sri Lanka has several social security programmes to support retired people. These include the government pension scheme, the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF), the Employees' Trust Fund (ETF), and several pension schemes for private sector and informal workers. However, these programmes do not provide equal protection for everyone.
Government pensions offer a regular income for life, but they are available mainly to public sector employees. Meanwhile, EPF and ETF members receive a one-time lump sum payment at retirement, which is often not enough to cover living expenses over many years. Pension schemes for informal sector workers also have low participation, leaving many older people without adequate financial support.
Recent challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic and Sri Lanka's economic crisis, have placed even greater strain on the country's social security system. Many elderly people continue to struggle with healthcare costs, poor nutrition, housing insecurity, and social isolation. At the same time, international organisations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have stressed the importance of protecting vulnerable groups while the country implements economic reforms.
This study examines how different social security programmes affect the wellbeing of older people in the Kalutara District. Rather than looking only at income, the researchers assessed both objective wellbeing (such as financial security, health, and living conditions) and subjective wellbeing (such as life satisfaction and personal happiness).
The study also used advanced research methods to compare the wellbeing of people enrolled in different pension schemes with those who receive no pension at all.
This GCF funded research can be accessed: https://acesse.one/zy1hyiy