Project Persephone

Project Persephone A space program for the rest of us A space program for the rest of us. What would that mean? But how? There might be different ways to reach this goal.

It doesn't mean everybody can go to space - that's will probably always be too expensive for most people. It should mean that everybody can take part in space development because participation has been made cheap enough and easy enough. Project Persephone's strategy is based on seeing several sustained trends

(1) in satellite networking, which is increasingly addressing mobile and remote clients;



(2) in the frontiers of bioscience where it meets problems of measurement and control;

(3) and in internet-based innovation for democratic governance. The founding assumptions are as follows. (1) To be truly for "the rest of us", we need to enable mass telepresence in orbital ecosystems, both for work and play, with much of the work to be for the purpose of continuous renewal of resources aboard the "ecosatellite" (exovivarium), and with much of the play to be invented by the participants themselves. (2) To be truly accessible to all means to be affordable for all. For this, we need to foster the preconditions for projectile space launch (ground-based hypervelocity acceleration) from equatorial mountain slopes, because this should be the cheapest way to get the needed materials to low Earth orbit. (2) To be truly for all who want to join and take part in good faith, governance of the effort should take so-called "agoric" forms -- including direct democracy, open source technology, open markets -- but putting a priority on global equity wherever the issue of global North-South wealth gaps presents itself along the way.

Yesterday, here in Bandung, after the usual early afternoon downpour, there was a second one, then a third one. Nothing ...
12/01/2024

Yesterday, here in Bandung, after the usual early afternoon downpour, there was a second one, then a third one. Nothing to "mark myself safe" about in the Antapani neighborhood I'm staying in, but some areas got hit quite a lot harder.

Extreme Weather caused flooding, landslides, and uprooted trees to hit Bandung and its surrounding areas on Thursday

I once visited a karate instructor in a gymnasium in Marawi. I'm not sure whether this was the same building. I was hopi...
03/12/2023

I once visited a karate instructor in a gymnasium in Marawi. I'm not sure whether this was the same building. I was hoping to get back to Marawi next year. I'll still go if I can. Sporadic outbreaks of violence haven't deterred me before, and I don't know why I should be any more intimidated now.

Attacked: a Catholic mass. Islam teaches that Christians should be protected if they are not against Islam. Marawi is officially "the Islamic City of Marawi." If you're a Catholic there, you can hardly be against Islam. But extremism is extremism. Running away from it just gives it more space to grow.

At least four people were killed and at least 50 injured after a bomb exploded during a morning Catholic Mass in a university gymnasium in Marawi, a city in the south of the country besieged by Islamist militants for five months in 2017.

As Donor  #1 and Volunteer  #1 for Project Persephone, which needs at least some money and requires at least some real t...
28/09/2023

As Donor #1 and Volunteer #1 for Project Persephone, which needs at least some money and requires at least some real travel, the pandemic hit me hard. My income dwindled and my debt grew. Travel to beneficiary regions became impossible. But I'm back, somehow, anyway.

Financial recovery is well under way now. But this means it's back to old challenges. One of the biggest is recruitment.

And in recruitment, a big challenge is basically ideological. Space development advocacy is shot through with (though at least not utterly permeated with) a kind of para-religion: visions of space settlement.

I think many of the technical challenges mentioned in this article have solutions. The political and economic ones, though? Not so much.

I still do believe in space development's value, of course. I wouldn't keep going if I didn't. But I have reality tests for value.

I can believe in adventure travel in space, privately financed, because I've seen it. Indeed, I got interested in space development again because of it. And for Project Persephone's purposes, I think that's enough.

Settlement is another thing again. I don't DISbelieve in it. It could happen. But I'll believe it when I see it. And I may not live long enough even if it does happen. If it happens, I'm not sure that's good news. I fear that it will be courtesy of some billionaire-financed religious cult, if at all -- and paranoid enough to acquire weaponry beyond what would be needed for self-defense.

The here and now, and for our children, a truly foreseeable future -- these are Project Persephone overriding concerns. If you believe in space settlement, at least admit it's an article of faith, not an inevitability. If you want to join our efforts, please don't proselytize for space settlement. If Project Persephone is successful, it should at least produce some useful technologies for the settlement purpose. Let that be enough for you.

Medical, financial and ethical hurdles stand in the way of the dream to settle in space

03/09/2023

An update on Spinlaunch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tz5CJ7Z9t2g

I've been looking at ground-based acceleration technologies for over 20 years now. Where Spinlaunch may be stalling out is on little more than variations on many past chapters of a book I might still write.

And they are political problems.

Locals objecting. Spinlaunch? Check.

Issues in locating outside the U.S. (hello ITAR/EAR!). Spinlaunnch Check.

How to scale up to major civil-engineering levels, which brings in construction approval processes, which are political. Spinlaunch? Check.

Alaska location! Hm, more issues. The locals want to know "Sounds great! But . . . what's in it for us?" Not much, it turns out. Spinlaunch? Check.

There are perhaps half a dozen different technologies proposed for ground-based pre-acceleration that have seen any significant lab development or prototyping. Which one is most technologically feasible? I don't know.

What I HAVE learned in the meantime, from various stalled attempts, is that a lot of the obstacles are basically -- even perhaps inherently -- political.

I've also learned that there seems to be something in the mentality of people who develop and promote such technologies that is just not a good match to the political and diplomatic sherpa labor required.

Do I have a possible answer? Yes! The product of years of thinking about this, in fact.

Will you be interested, though?

If spaceflight is something like your religion, I'm guessing not.

Call now to connect with business.

住所

1-25-33 Takadanobaba
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
169-0075

アラート

Project Persephoneがニュースとプロモを投稿した時に最初に知って当社にメールを送信する最初の人になりましょう。あなたのメールアドレスはその他の目的には使用されず、いつでもサブスクリプションを解除することができます。

共有する

カテゴリー