Remain in Europe

  • Home
  • Remain in Europe
Call Directions Website Contact the organization

Remain in Europe Remain Remain Remain. This is very serious. Your future depends on Britain in Europe. Secure our national security. Enhance our economy, vote Remain.

02/12/2024

Those who falsely flogged a glorious future outside EU now spread lies about green energy

Story by Kevin Maguire Daily Mirror 02/12/2024
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beware the Brexit snake oil chameleons. They are turning even dirtier and spouting poison against Britain becoming a green energy superpower.
Con artists who falsely flogged a glorious future outside the European Union are today’s fossil fools scream-ing against electrifying life. The Kemi Badenochs and Nigel Farages – ever eager to change the conversation from Brexit-induced poor growth, bigger bills, falling trade, record migration and longer passport queues – are diverting attention by suddenly scapegoating net zero.
Electric vehicles are their latest battleground. The whole world is driving into the future with the market for petrol and diesel cars and vans declining.
Unfortunately, some UK manufacturers, including Stellantis at the Vauxhall plant in Luton now earmarked for closure, were slow to innovate and invest. The inconvenient truth ignored by the Brexit anti-green dinosaurs has been revealed by the Bedfordshire factory’s former boss, Mark Noble.
He insists “troubles began with Brexit” itself by creating uncertainty over exports which comprise 80% of output from Luton and its sister Vauxhall plant in Ellesmere Port, Cheshire. Labour Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds rightly recognises punitive £15,000-a-pop sales penalties – inherited from his predecessor Badenoch – require reviewing.

But going backwards by abandoning targets for new cars from 2030 to be hybrids or electric would be waving a white flag to ideologues. These prehistoric monsters have the same mindset as those in the past who objected to scrapping men walking with red flags in front of early automobiles.

Building Britain into a green energy superpower is one of five missions Keir Starmer will hammer home this week alongside boosting economic growth, cutting crime, reviving the NHS and expanding opportunity. Eco socialist Ed Miliband was a low- watt Labour leader but is shining brightly as Energy Secretary.

Whitehall mandarins acknowledging he’s a capable minister and experts are impressed at his grasp of the brief. EU haters distorted reality to bring us a disastrous Brexit. Now they’re at it again, trying to rubbish the greener future.
They must not be allowed to succeed. Going forward is crucial to Britain’s prosperity, not to mention the environment and protecting the planet from a climate nightmare. Let’s hope it’s once bitten, twice shy and the snake oil peddlers suffer their own car crash second time around.

07/05/2024

Brexit’s Broken Promises: 19 Lies That Failed to Materialize
Story by Hazel Savage 07/05/2024
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brexit’s Broken Promises: 19 Lies That Failed to Materialize
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remember when Brexit was sold as a straightforward, win-win situation? As it turns out, the road to Brexit was paved with not-so-good intentions and a fair share of outright fibs. The campaign was a masterclass in misinformation, selling Britons a basket of more fictional promises than a Sunday night drama. Now, with the benefit of hindsight, how many of these myths have you spotted unravelling at the seams?

1. £350 Million a Week to the NHS

The famous bus promise—£350 million a week for the NHS. In reality, that money, much like our European friendships, seems to have evaporated. Instead, we’ve spent billions on Brexit preparations, making that bus more of a phantom coach driven by ghosts of promises past.

2. Easy Trade Deals

Quick and easy trade deals were promised as soon as we left. Fast forward, and those deals are either underwhelming or still under negotiation. It seems ‘quick and easy’ was code for ‘slow and frustrating.’

3. The Irish Border Issue

“It’ll be fine,” they said. “No hard border,” they promised. Fast forward to customs checks and protocol disputes—turns out, geopolitics is a bit more complicated than a slogan on a leaflet.

4. Turkey Joining the EU

The fear-mongering about Turkey joining the EU soon and flooding the UK with migrants turned out to be baseless. Not only is Turkey no closer to joining the EU, but the discussion is off the table entirely. This was scaremongering on steroids with a geopolitical twist.

5. No Downside to Brexit

Remember hearing there would be no downside to Brexit, only a “considerable upside”? The economy begs to differ, having been considerably downsized instead. The only upside seems to be in the increase in bureaucracy and export challenges.

6. Maintaining the Status Quo with the EU

Some thought we could maintain all the benefits of EU membership while blocking all the drawbacks. Reality check: you can’t have your cake and eat it, especially if it’s stuck at customs awaiting import clearance.

7. Immediate Economic Benefits

The immediate economic benefits of Brexit are still missing, much like logic in the original campaign. The pound slumped, investment cooled, and the financial forecast is as stable as a three-legged chair.
8. Boost for Fishermen

British fishermen were supposed to thrive post-Brexit. Instead, they’re drowning in red tape and lost European markets. It appears ‘sovereignty’ over waters doesn’t equate to selling fish freely.

9. Strengthened Union of the UK

Brexit was supposed to strengthen the UK’s union. Instead, Scotland is eyeing independence more keenly, and Northern Ireland is navigating a sea of protocol issues. So much for unity!

10. Sunlit Uplands

The promise of “sunlit uplands” feels more like stumbling in the dark. Economic forecasts are grim, and the political landscape is as stormy as ever. Those uplands now seem more like a mirage, visible only to the most optimistic or deluded.

11. More Jobs for Brits

“We’ll see a surge in jobs for Brits,” they claimed. Yet, with sectors from farming to healthcare struggling without their EU workforce, the job market is as shaky as ever. Seems like we might need more than just British grit to fill these gaps.

12. NHS Staffing Levels

Brexit was argued to help control NHS staffing. Instead, we’re grappling with shortages as EU nationals leave the healthcare sector. Another case of ‘be careful what you wish for.’

13. Protecting British Culture

Protecting British culture from the EU’s influence sounded grand. But what was under threat? It turns out the cultural exchange was more beneficial, and now it’s restricted. Who knew opera and cheese were so offensive?
Protecting British culture from the EU’s influence sounded grand. But what was under threat? It turns out the cultural exchange was more beneficial, and now it’s restricted. Who knew opera and cheese were so offensive?

14. Freedom to Make Our Laws

Free from the shackles of EU law, we could finally make our own decisions—except now we spend half our time trying to align new laws with those we just escaped, to keep trade flowing. Irony much?

15. Reducing Red Tape

Cutting down on red tape was a headline act. In an unexpected plot twist, businesses now navigate more paperwork than ever before to trade with the EU. Turns out, red tape breeds faster than rabbits.

16. Sovereignty Equals Power

Reclaiming sovereignty was meant to restore Britain’s control over its fate. Instead, it’s shown just how interconnected and dependent we are on our neighbours. Isolation might be sovereignty, but it’s lonely at the top—or in this case, out on a limb.

17. Enhancing Security

Leaving the EU was supposed to enhance our security. Yet, we find ourselves excluded from real-time security alerts and databases. It’s like choosing to leave the neighbourhood watch because you don’t like the coordinator.

18. No Impact on Expats

The millions of Brits living in the EU wouldn’t be affected, they said. Now, many face residency issues, healthcare headaches, and a mountain of bureaucracy. Paradise lost, indeed.

19. Food Prices Would Remain Stable

Finally, food prices were supposed to remain stable. Instead, we’re navigating increased costs and occasional shortages. Brexit diet, anyone?

14/02/2024

How much has Brexit cost the UK economy? Goldman Sachs says leaving EU has reduced GDP by 5%
Story by Ralph Blackburn 14/02/2024
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Goldman Sachs said: "The UK has significantly underperformed other advanced economies since the 2016 EU referendum, with lower growth and higher inflation."

One of the main debates during the EU referendum in 2016 was about the impact that Brexit would have on the UK economy.
Remainers argued that increased friction with the Europe, our closest trading partner, would hit businesses, while Leavers hoped that the ability to sign free trade agreements around the world would negate this. So far, FTAs with Australia and New Zealand have done little to boost growth - and more than half of the UK's trade is still with the EU.

And this trade friction is one of the reasons that Goldman Sachs, one of the world's largest investment banks, has now said that the UK's economy is 5% smaller due to Brexit. But what has Goldman Sachs said about quittingAnd this trade friction is one of the reasons that Goldman Sachs, one of the world's largest investment banks, has now said that the UK's economy is 5% smaller due to Brexit. But what has Goldman Sachs said about quitting the EU and does the government agree? Here's everything you need to know. the EU and does the government agree? Here's everything you need to know.

What has Goldman Sachs said about the economy and Brexit?
The US investment bank has said the UK's gross domestic product (GDP), which is used to measure the economy, would have been 5% bigger had we remained in the EU. This is a sizable difference given the economy is currently struggling to grow, which means tax revenues are lower and there can be less investment in public services.

The study compared the UK's economy to a hypothetical one that never left the EU. Goldman Sachs said that UK goods trade has been affected, with increased friction with the EU following Brexit, as well as lower business investment.
It claimed that trade volume - the total of imports and exports - is around 15% smaller than comparable countries. NationalWorld previously reported how non-EU countries were struggling to replace trade with Europe.

The increase in non-EU migrants coming to the UK to study instead of work has also impacted this, Goldman Sachs said. The bank explained: "Analysis shows that lower EU immigration has likely played a role in exacerbating labour market tightness and thus contributed to the UK’s higher inflation rates since 2016.
“EU immigrants tended to have high labour market participation rates, as many of them entered the UK specifically to work. By contrast, many recent arrivals are students, meaning that immigration may be playing less of a role in boosting labour supply than the headline numbers suggest.”
The Leave campaign made reducing immigration the centre piece of its argument for Brexit. Recently the government announced new rules to make it harder for migrants to qualify for jobs in the UK. However, Goldman Sachs seems to think this is stymieing economic growth.

It explained: "The UK has significantly underperformed other advanced economies since the 2016 EU referendum, with lower growth and higher inflation." Last year, NationalWorld analysis of the UK statistics and international inflation data found the country was the worst-hit major European economy when it comes to food price inflation.

What has the Office for Budget Responsibility said about Brexit?
It's not just Goldman Sachs which believes Brexit has taken a huge chunk out of the UK economy. The Office for Budget Responsibility, the government's fiscal watchdog which assesses the Budget and the Autumn Statement, agrees.

Last year, Richard Hughes, the OBR chair, said that Brexit would do more damage to the economy than Covid. He said the OBR believed that leaving the EU would cost GDP by 4% in the long term.
He told the BBC: "We think that, in the long run, [Brexit] reduces our overall output by around 4% compared to had we remained in the EU."

When asked about the scale of the harm done, Hughes said: “I’ve struggled to put it in any kind of sensible context. It’s a shock to the UK economy of the order of magnitude to other shocks that we’ve seen from the pandemic, from the energy crisis.”
What has the government said about Brexit and the economy?
The government is still very bullish about Brexit, claiming that it has helped the economy. Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch recently posted a thread on X (Twitter) about an array of alleged Brexit benefits.

She said that "since 2016, we've grown faster than Germany, Italy, and Japan" and claimed that UK exports are up. She added: "The reality is Brexit is a strategy for the next few decades. We’re only four years in and it is going well. Of course there are challenges, but we are working through them."

I recently asked the Prime Minister's official spokesman about the economic impact of Brexit. He responded: "The UK has grown faster than Italy and Germany since the 2016 referendum. It's grown faster than Germany since leaving the EU in 2020.
"The IMF forecast for medium-term growth is brighter than many of our European neighbours, that includes France and Germany, and obviously Brexit provides us with freedoms that's enabling the public to access medicines faster, it's allowing farmers to get more support from the government and obviously for us to seek free trade agreements."

Ralph Blackburn is NationalWorld’s politics editor based in Westminster, where he gets special access to Parliament, MPs and government briefings. If you liked this article you can follow Ralph on X (Twitter) here and sign up to his free weekly newsletter Politics Uncovered, which brings you the latest analysis and gossip from Westminster every Sunday morning.

27/01/2024

Liverpool FC

'Sometimes I wished he was' - national media make same Man City point in Jurgen Klopp Liverpool tributes
Liverpool Echo 27/01/2024
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The end is approaching for Liverpool and Jurgen Klopp.
A near-nine-year partnership filled with highs and lows will draw to a close in May when Klopp decides to go his own way, seeking a break from the world of football.

The response to his exit in the last 24 hours tells you all you need to know about the German's impact on the Premier League and the Liverpool legacy he has created.

Those working for the national media, who watched him closely every step of the way, have made clear their thoughts on how the 56-year-old will be remembered and why it will be challenging to find another character like the former Borussia Dortmund coach for quite some time.

'We may only realise the true value in the next few seasons'
Miguel Delaney of the Independent wrote: "European football has, for the time being, lost the greatest counterweight to the continent’s current champions and most dominant team. Klopp is not just the only manager to have won Liverpool a title since their glory era. He is the only manager to have got close to Manchester City’s levels in England. His Liverpool are the only other team to get past 90 points since Pep Guardiola started winning titles and he did it three times. An arrival from the Bundesliga was almost the single biggest influence in preventing the Premier League looking like its German equivalent.
"There is something else rather fitting in that, since Klopp was also the most direct and profound challenger to Guardiola in terms of pure tactics. Just as the Catalan re-interpreted Total Football to ensure that pressing spread to dominate the game, Klopp honed the counter-press.
"Klopp restored Liverpool to the height of the game, to become a serious force again. He made them one of the great names again, and not just based on their history. He won their sixth Champions League. He won their long-awaited 19th title. The latter has come in a totally different era to all previous, where its value is even more prized. We may only realise the true value in the next few seasons."

'The man steering the ship was different'
Dominic King of the Daily Mail wrote: "You could tell even in those first few weeks that Liverpool were going to go a different place because the man steering the ship was different. With each passing week, you heard stories about the culture shift that was occurring and the influence he was having.

"One involves Jordan Henderson being asked by the squad to go and speak to Klopp about his decision to move training to a 5pm start as opposed to mid-morning. The move was unpopular, most players wanted something more sociable.

"When Henderson made the enquiry, Klopp pulled a face that suggested he was trying to multiply 2456 by 838 without a calculator: quizzical, confused, irritated. He told his captain to go back and get those who had an issue to see him themselves. Nobody came forward – training stayed at 5pm."
'The greatest tribute you could pay him'
Jonathan Liew of the Guardian wrote: "All that will really endure from those years of toil is the human moments, the flesh-and-bone moments when Klopp and his team reached through the fourth wall and made you feel. The much-ridiculed curtain call after a 2-2 draw against West Brom. The broken glasses against Norwich. The magnificent bender after Kyiv. The way Anfield sounded on the night they beat Barcelona 4-0 or destroyed Manchester United 7-0, where you were, who you were with.

"Football has never been purely an intellectual exercise and it has never been purely a professional pursuit. At its best it is the background music to life, the backdrop to nights in and nights out and comedowns and breakdowns and hook-ups and break-ups. Not everybody in the navel-adoring world of football really gets that. Somehow, you always felt Klopp did. Liverpool are not my club and Klopp has never been my manager, but perhaps the greatest tribute you could pay him is that sometimes I wished he was.
"And yet, as a competitor to his core Klopp always realised that there was little point in making people feel good unless you could also do good. His work with the club foundation, the way he would carve time out of his schedule to meet disabled or elderly fans, made irresistible online content but also came from a sincere and genuine place. “All of us have to do whatever we can to protect one another,” he wrote to Liverpool fans in March 2020, as the nation prepared to lock down. “In society, I mean. This should be the case all the time in life, but in this moment I think it matters more than ever. Please look out for each other.”

'Their bond is eternal'
Henry Winter of the Times wrote: "Jürgen Klopp is so loved by Liverpool that when he walks away this summer, he will never walk alone. Klopp will always have the reverence of fans, players and staff for what he achieved at Liverpool, for the heights he lifted them to. They have seen great things together, shared incredible moments and journeys that others can only dream of. Klopp and Liverpool separate soon but their bond is eternal.

"Klopp’s impact is also a reminder that football is about emotion. He’s always been one of the most demonstrative in the dugout, and then striding out towards the Kop, beating the crest on his chest, and delivering those trademark three punches, swiping the air, and garnering roars in return. The game does that. And when the game has been most special, Klopp has celebrated in style, slugging on a b**r and almost falling off the open-top bus in 2019 after the Champions League win.

"Klopp is serious and fun, occasionally moody. He’s human. The 56-year-old has a very technical side, working on sports science, marginal gains and drilling the tactics, but it is also his personality that has helped to make good players even better at Liverpool. Salah has produced his best football consistently under Klopp. The next generation of Curtis Jones, Conor Bradley, Jarell Quansah, Bobby Clark, Harvey Elliott and others grow under his tutelage (and what a magnificent squad he leaves Liverpool with)."
'Klopp's legacy will have to be re-assessed in the event his closest rivals were found to have broken the financial rules'
Sam Wallace of the Telegraph wrote: "The Guardiola-Klopp rivalry is not yet done. The Premier League’s outstanding charges against City dating back to the 2009-10 season have the scope to reshape what we think about the last 16 years in the English game. There is little prospect of a guilty verdict from the independent commission re-awarding any of City’s seven Premier League titles to the nearest challengers. Yet Klopp’s legacy will have to be re-assessed in the event his closest rivals were found to have broken the financial rules that govern the clubs.

"Whatever happens in the hearings between the meetings, Klopp has always faced Guardiola with fewer financial resources at his disposal. That was the case with Dortmund and then Liverpool against a club in City who have been transformed by the wealth of their Abu Dhabi owner into a winning machine under Guardiola. In the face of such investment – and high levels of competency when it came to trading players and developing youngsters – Klopp and Liverpool have come closest to breaking City’s grip.
"In other eras, Klopp might have won many more Premier League titles. In the Guardiola era he will have to settle for one, possibly two, although given the strength of the competition, whatever he leaves Merseyside with will have a value that cannot be overestimated."

23/06/2023

Follow
'Expect waffle and piffle aplenty as Boris Johnson fails upwards again into new job'
Story by Brian Reade 23/06/2023

You have to be blessed with certain qualities to survive as a columnist on a national tabloid newspaper.
Holding passionate opinions, knowing how to string a sentence together and being unafraid to set fire to sacred cows are fine for starters. But what really sets you apart is a runaway ego, skin thicker than a pimp’s wallet and an ability to conjure up bulls**t at the drop of a hat.
Which is how I’ve survived for almost three decades. Until now, when I have serious competition on the thick-skinned/ego/bull-merchant front, as each Saturday I go up against someone the Daily Mail describes as “erudite”, “a star writer”, and “one of the wittiest in the business”. Not to mention “required reading” for “millions across the world”.
And that’s just his kids.
Can’t nail him? How about this take from one of his previous editors, Max Hastings, at the Daily Telegraph: “There is room for debate about whether he is a scoundrel or a mere rogue, but not much about his moral bankruptcy, rooted in a contempt for the truth. He cares for no interest save his own fame and gratification.”
Yes, that’s right, my new opponent writing every Saturday in the Daily Mail is Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, who, true to form, broke parliamentary rules by informing the body that oversees the money-making moves of ex-ministers a mere half an hour before his new columnist job was announced.
He tears through rules like vultures do corpses.
I trust the Mail’s lawyers are looking forward to the bare-faced deceptions they will need to w**d out, almost as much as the sub-editors are to the rushed copy that will arrive many hours after deadline, then having to patch up a torrential spillage of
verbal diarrhoea that would do United Utilities proud.
As you would expect, the serial failure will earn a mountain of cash, possibly a million quid a year, but then when he let it be known the £275k that Telegraph were paying him was “chicken feed” the Mail had to up the stakes for a man whose genius lies in the fact that the more lives he screws up, and the more cock-ups he makes, the more lavishly he is rewarded.
Nobody fails upwards quite like Johnson who, in the six months after he was kicked out of Downing Street, pocketed £5.6million from blathering baloney to fools with more money than perception. It’s all down to that Eton charm, which is so seductive that even a sworn enemy like myself feels that, in the spirit of fraternal solidarity, I should pass on these tips about tabloid newspaper column writing.
Your readers will want to understand you. So drop all the Greek and Latin phrases and concentrate on the language you talk most fluently: waffle.
Your readers will need to trust you. So unlike during the Brexit campaign when you wrote two Telegraph columns – one arguing why we should remain, the other why we should leave – then calculated which would best serve your leadership ambitions before sending the latter, try to be honest. The word is in the dictionary. Look it up. Also, your readers will want to believe you are credible, so try to use facts (again, check the dictionary).
After all, it wasn’t that long ago you published a viciously unfounded editorial in the Spectator magazine incorrectly claiming that the Hillsborough Disaster was caused by “drunken fans at the back of the crowd who mindlessly tried to fight their way into the ground”. Then had to scuttle up to Liverpool to grovel.
Your readers will want to be entertained, so play for laughs. You pulled that off superbly as Prime Minister, managing almost single-handedly (well, with the help of some of your ministerial appointments) to make Britain a global laughing stock. Who can forget the keynote speech on climate change at the UN when you went off on a nonsensical tangent about Kermit the Frog and the world media labelled you a blond
Mr Bean.
Try not to use some of the lines from your broadsheet columns such as “tank-topped bum boys” to describe g**s, “piccaninnies with watermelon smiles” to describe Africans, or likening Muslim women in burkas to bank robbers (although to be fair, that could be exactly the kind of anti-woke stuff your new employers are after, so feel free to ignore that advice).
You will probably meet other journalists. If one gives you their address, don’t store it then promise it to a convicted fraudster who wants to have them beaten up.
Try not to lie to your boss, as you did to the editor of the Times and the leader of the Conservatives.
I know that’s a problem which recurs whenever you open your mouth, but remember that’s how you lose jobs. The defence “I cannot be held responsible for what you thought I said” won’t wash.
You see, journalism is about delivering truths, not as you admitted to during your stint as the Daily Telegraph’s Brussels correspondent, inventing malicious lies about the EU to “create a new reality”. If you spout lies it won’t be a “kangaroo court” you’ll end up in but a real one and, unlike when you were an MP, you won’t find the taxpayer footing your eye-watering legal bill.
When the editor asks you to file your column on time because failing to do so costs the business, don’t
say as you did to CEOs worried about the impact of a no-deal Brexit: “f*** business”.
Remember you’re paid by one newspaper so don’t go leaking juicy stories to other right-wing media to curry favour with them, as you did at the Telegraph.
Boris new job Like you, I no longer have a pass to get into Parliament, but I’ve got mates down there who can always sign me in. That could be a struggle for you as only seven MPs voted to save your skin in this week’s debate about you lying to the Commons.
I’d steer clear of columns about Covid deaths, the need to attend COBRA meetings, husbands who have affairs while their wife undergoes cancer treatment, feckless males who spread their seed for fun, the causes of the current cost-of-living crisis, the lack of new hospitals and homes being built, taking back control of our borders, levelling-up the North, lazy workers, the nepotism that corrupts the Honours List, lying to a monarch, the abject failure of Brexit, drunken office parties or the dangers in
electing narcissistic con men like Donald Trump. They’re all a bit too close to home.
Remember, our job is to call out liars and hypocrites, not act like them. Remember, also, that our role is not to create permanent division, bitterness and hatred in a country we pretend
to love.
You’ve already done that job. In spades.

Time To Kick!
01/01/2023

Time To Kick!

The European Movement UK is standing up for European rights, standards and values in the UK.

Let's get a bit of sanity!
01/01/2023

Let's get a bit of sanity!

The European Movement UK is a grassroots all-party pressure group campaigning to maintain European values, standards and rights. Find out more about us.

I am still angry with Boris and Co. for telling so many fibs to win the 2016 referandum.
01/01/2023

I am still angry with Boris and Co. for telling so many fibs to win the 2016 referandum.

Right now the government is trying to pass legislation that would allow them to scrap over 3,800 laws carried over from when we were in the EU, practically overnight. The Retained EU Law Bill is the first step in dismantling regulations and standards protecting our environment, food quality and work...

01/01/2023

"I still remember the day we joined the EEC (now EU)"
Let us join the European Movement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voices: Michael Heseltine: Fifty years ago, we joined the EU – today, I deplore the deception of Brexit

Opinion by Michael Heseltine • 01/01/2023
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fifty years ago today, on 1 January 1973, the United Kingdom joined the European Economic Community. To understand the enormity of that event, one must stand back and reflect on a thousand years of our history.

Of course, economics is never far below the surface of political self-interest, but that history is about territory, religion, power, and the wars they provoked. The 20th century saw bloodshed on an unprecedented scale and the involvement of civilian populations hitherto unimagined. By the end of the Second World War, the peoples of occupied, defeated Europe, who had experienced the horrors of conflagration three times in three-quarters of a century, responded to the imperative that it must never happen again. We should never forget that that is why modern Europe was born.

I lived through the Second World War and grew up in a Britain that recognised a huge debt for the loyalty of the Commonwealth but had to come to terms with an empire unwilling to accept imperial status. There was a growing awareness of the disparity of power between ourselves and the United States and an uncomfortable reluctance to throw in our lot with the rapidly recovering Europe

New Year’s Day 1973 gave us a new sense of hope and purpose. I became the first British minister to speak about our new relationship in the United States and confronted the issues by addressing the World Affairs Council in Los Angeles. I explained my conclusion that such were the resources of the world’s major powers that we would find it increasingly difficult to maintain an advanced industrial base. The solution was to mould together a partnership of nations that, in total, would equal the competition to which the world will increasingly expose us.
The resources of 50 million British people – however proud we may be of what we have achieved – will never match the technologies and capabilities available by one or two major powers. I concluded that it offers a new and more meaningful partnership. Rereading that speech today, I would not change those words.
As president of the European Movement UK, I deplore the deception that Brexit represents. I look back to 1973 as the post-war year when Britain accepted the loss of its empire and chose a new European destiny. A fresh generation of politicians saw a better future for our country by pooling our sovereignty with our neighbours to build something that would not replace our national identity but would be greater than the sum of the parts. Over the next 20 years, that is what we did.
The rules that constrained travel in Europe, that propped up airlines and stopped you from taking more than £50 spending money on your foreign holiday, were all junked, and airlines like easyJet brought European holidays to millions who had never been abroad.
A whole new market developed in professional services – with the UK at the centre of it. The creation of the single market in 1986 was arguably Margaret Thatcher’s most outstanding achievement. It was, particularly, the opportunity for British financial companies to serve a much larger European market which they seized with energy and skill.
But something less tangible also happened. I felt it as a minister in Mrs Thatcher’s government. We had a seat at the table and had influence again. Post-Brexit, we see the growing international issues of the environment and global warming being discussed by our European neighbours in our absence.
It is easy to look back and list the unfulfilled promises. American concerns over the Northern Irish protocol have scuppered the US free trade deal, and the agricultural deal with Australia that even the minister who negotiated it has said is bad for Britain. Virtually no detail has emerged six years after we were told a bonfire of red tape would energise our economy. Instead, we are left with rumours and speculation that deter investment and provoke the concern of bodies such as the National Trust, the Wildlife Trust, and the RSPB.
Regulation is what separates the law of the jungle from civilised society. Three current issues will push the government to act; avian flu, the Grenfell Tower report and the collapse of the cryptocurrency company FTX are topical examples of why governments seek to regulate and protect us.
Control of our borders was the essential Brexit issue. We were not promised the miserable, humiliating mess that our immigration policy has become. The British people were deceived, and that becomes clearer every day. Every day the need to change direction becomes more urgent. It is harder to measure the economic impact because of the pandemic and the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But if you look closely, the truth is emerging.
The UK economy is over 5 per cent smaller, says the Centre for European Reform, than it would have been without Brexit. The consequence of erecting trade barriers with the EU means, says the Resolution Foundation, “a broad-based reduction in workers’ pay and productivity” that it estimated as a loss of £470 per worker per year. That is nearly a thousand pounds for the average couple.
The Office for Budget Responsibility says that the weak UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement means that our trade with the EU will fall by 15 per cent. And on top of all that, the sterling has plummeted by around 20 per cent from its value in 2016, adding to inflation. A survey of its members by the British Chamber of Commerce published last week found that Britain’s Brexit trade deal fails to help more than three-quarters of companies increase sales or grow their business.
Brexit is not irreversible, and public opinion is moving. Sixty-five per cent think the government is handling Brexit poorly, 45 per cent think we should rejoin compared with 32 per cent in favour of staying out, and 58 per cent think we were wrong to leave compared with 42 per cent who think we were right.
We need to start rebuilding bridges. It is time for a pragmatic, constructive policy towards Europe, one rooted in our shared history and with an appetite for restoring this country’s place at its heart.

Address


Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Remain in Europe posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Remain in Europe:

Shortcuts

  • Want your organization to be the top-listed non profit organization?

Share