Medway Pride

Medway Pride Medway Pride page promotes Medway Pride & our Joint events with other organisations and events

Smith and Grady v UK (1999) was a landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights that unanimously found that th...
10/06/2026

Smith and Grady v UK (1999) was a landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights that unanimously found that the investigation into and subsequent discharge of personnel from HM Forces on the basis they were gay was a breach of their right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decision caused a massive stink at the time, but led the UK to adopt a revised sexual-orientation-free Armed Forces Code of Social Conduct in January 2000.

The ECHR's decision was doubly important because the case had previously been dismissed in both the UK High Court and Court of Appeal, who had found that the Navy's actions had not 'violated the principles of legality'. The ECHR didn't agree, and let the UK government have it with both barrels, noting

'attitudes ranged from stereotypical expressions of hostility to those of homosexual orientation, to vague expressions of unease about the presence of homosexual colleagues. To the extent that they represent a predisposed bias on the part of a heterosexual majority against a homosexual minority, these negative attitudes cannot, of themselves, be considered by the Court to amount to sufficient justification for the interferences with the applicants' rights outlined above any more than similar negative attitudes towards those of a different race, origin or colour'

Ouch!

In 1998, a significant attempt was made by MPs to equalise the age of consent for homosexual acts at 16, aligning it wit...
09/06/2026

In 1998, a significant attempt was made by MPs to equalise the age of consent for homosexual acts at 16, aligning it with the age for heterosexual acts. This measure was ultimately blocked by the House of Lords, sparking a multi-year constitutional battle.

Labour backbencher Ann Keen introduced an amendment (New Clause 1) to the Crime and Disorder Bill in June 1998. The House of Commons overwhelmingly supported the measure on a free vote, passing it by 336 to 129 (a majority of 207). A month later, however, the House of Lords rejected the amendment by a large majority of 290 to 122.

The campaign against the amendment was led by the Conservative peer Baroness Young. Opponents argued that the lower age of consent would fail to protect “vulnerable young people” and cited concerns about public opinion and traditional family values. Supporters of the amendment, including Home Secretary Jack Straw and Stonewall, framed the issue as one of basic equality and human rights. They noted that the existing law discriminated against young men and caused personal misery. Which of course it did.

Believe it or not, the Lords rejected attempts to equalise the age of consent another two times, in 1999 and 2000 😠

What a crazy few years to look back on!
09/06/2026

What a crazy few years to look back on!

In 1994, the United Kingdom lowered the age of consent for gay and bisexual men from 21 to 18 years of age. This change ...
08/06/2026

In 1994, the United Kingdom lowered the age of consent for gay and bisexual men from 21 to 18 years of age. This change was enacted as part of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.

During a parliamentary debate on February 21, 1994, MPs considered two primary amendments to the bill: one to lower the age to 16 (matching the heterosexual age of consent) and a 'compromise' amendment to lower it to 18. The proposal for age 16, introduced by Conservative MP Edwina Currie, was defeated in the House of Commons by 307 votes to 280. The compromise for age 18 was then passed by a significant majority of 429 to 164. High-ranking government figures supported the age 18 'compromise', arguing it balanced personal freedom with the 'protection' of young men from activities they might later regret. Because 16 year old boys need protecting from older men while 16 year old girls don't? It beggars belief, as does the idea that any young gay man might 'regret' having fantastic, fulfilling, life-affirming fun 🙄

It was a step forward nevertheless, so woohoo!

It's pretty shocking that this didn't happen until 1992, but it was a step in the right direction and done years before ...
07/06/2026

It's pretty shocking that this didn't happen until 1992, but it was a step in the right direction and done years before Section 28 was abolished.

lgbtqiapluspride

Address

Medway Pride CIC, MGSD Centre, 331 High Street
Rochester
ME11DA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Medway Pride posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organisation

Send a message to Medway Pride:

Share