06/03/2026
OPEN LETTER TO THE HOME SECRETARY
The Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP
Home Secretary
Home Office
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
6 March 2026
Dear Home Secretary,
RE: IMMIGRATION RULE CHANGES OF 5 MARCH 2026 – IMPACT ON REFUGEES AND ASYLUM SEEKERS
We write on behalf of Worcester LGBT (Asylum, Support, Network), a community organisation supporting LGBTQI+ asylum seekers and refugees in the United Kingdom.
Our organisation works directly with individuals who have sought protection in the UK after fleeing persecution because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Through our community engagement work we observe how immigration policy operates in practice and how changes affect some of the most vulnerable people in the asylum system.
We are writing to respectfully raise several concerns regarding the recent Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules published on 5 March 2026.
REDUCTION IN THE DURATION OF REFUGEE LEAVE
Under the new rules, individuals granted refugee status following claims or further submissions made on or after 2 March 2026 will normally receive permission to stay for 30 months rather than the previous standard grant of 5 years.
While we understand the government’s objective of maintaining an orderly immigration system, this change may create additional uncertainty for individuals who have already experienced significant trauma and instability.
For many refugees, particularly those who have fled persecution related to sexual orientation or gender identity, stability and security are essential to rebuilding their lives. Shorter periods of leave may lead to repeated immigration applications, ongoing uncertainty and additional barriers to long-term integration.
PATHWAY TO SETTLEMENT (INDEFINITE LEAVE TO REMAIN)
We also note that the changes interact with the existing protection settlement framework.
For many recognised refugees, the pathway to Indefinite Leave to Remain represents an important stage in achieving stability and integration in the United Kingdom. Settlement allows individuals to establish secure lives, contribute to their communities and fully participate in society.
We respectfully ask the Home Office to provide clear guidance on how the revised 30-month grant of protection leave will interact with the settlement route, including how continuity of leave and eligibility for settlement will operate in practice.
It would be helpful for both practitioners and affected individuals to understand whether the pathway to settlement will remain accessible in a predictable and transparent manner.
FURTHER SUBMISSIONS PROCEDURE
We also note the introduction of new validity requirements for further submissions and the requirement for individuals to attend an in-person appointment at a Service and Support Centre.
While we recognise the need for procedural clarity, we hope that safeguards will remain in place to ensure that individuals with new evidence relating to their protection needs are able to have that evidence considered fairly.
Many asylum seekers, particularly those from LGBTQI+ backgrounds, may disclose key aspects of their identity or past experiences only after a period of time due to fear, trauma or cultural stigma. It is therefore important that procedural requirements do not unintentionally prevent genuine protection claims from being examined.
UNITED KINGDOM’S INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION COMMITMENTS
The United Kingdom has a long and respected history of providing protection to those fleeing persecution, consistent with its obligations under the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol.
In particular, the Convention establishes the principle that refugees should not be returned to territories where their life or freedom would be threatened and recognises the importance of allowing refugees to rebuild their lives in safety.
We respectfully encourage continued consideration of how the asylum system can balance effective migration management with the United Kingdom’s longstanding humanitarian and international commitments.
COMMUNITY PERSPECTIVE
Through our work supporting LGBTQI+ asylum seekers, we regularly see individuals who have fled severe persecution and who are seeking only the opportunity to live safely and contribute positively to British society.
Policies that promote stability, clarity and fairness within the protection system can play an important role in supporting integration and community cohesion.
CONCLUSION
We appreciate the Home Office’s continued engagement on matters relating to asylum and migration policy. Our intention in writing is to share the perspective of a community organisation working directly with LGBTQI+ asylum seekers and refugees.
We would welcome any further clarification the Home Office can provide regarding the practical operation of these rule changes, particularly in relation to the pathway to settlement and the operation of the further submissions process.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Yours sincerely,
Worcester LGBT (Asylum, Support, Network)