21/04/2025
Good evening, defenders of the Constitution,
This is a (not-so-brief) explanation of why the remedy we use works — and why it has worked for us in the past.
Thanks to the Committee of the Barons invoking Article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, we now have a lawful and peaceful way to resist injustice without resorting to the streets Our approach is based solely on evidential facts and English constitutional principles — nothing more, nothing less.
Why? Anyone who challenges our standing is also challenging the English Constitution, which amounts to treason at common law. And for the record — Tony Blair did not legally repeal the Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act 1795 when he introduced the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (Chapter 36), no matter what government figures may claim.
To truly understand and apply the law, you’ll need to recognize that constitutional law (common law) takes precedence over today’s corporate statutes and rules, which are pushed by imposters and career politicians. But don’t just take our word for it — research it for yourself. Just be wary: the internet is full of disinformation. Try searching for “English Constitution” and see how many results falsely claim the UK doesn’t have one.
That argument is laughable. They claim that because we don’t have a written, codified document like the U.S. Constitution, ours doesn't exist. Yet we do have a written, codified constitution — built and refined by the people over centuries, through revolutions and resistance. It’s a living system, rooted in custom, legal precedent, and constitutional documents. It is codified — and it works when fully applied.
The law belongs to the people. That’s why our policing system is meant to be by consent. We all implicitly consent to the Constitution because it protects our rights and ensures justice. Today, however, we live under a corporate system of deception, where uninformed people are used for profit.
Now to the point: The regime operates on presumption.
They presume your consent. If you respond to their summons voluntarily — or ignore their letters — they assume you accept their authority. They presume you're a corporate entity. They presume you understand “legalese” and stand under their fictional jurisdiction.
We remove these presumptions. We present evidence of Article 61’s invocation (such as the Daily Telegraph report) and follow a lawful process. We assert that we do not consent — because the law forbids us to do so under the circumstances. We conditionally accept any demands on the basis that the claimant must prove their authority, post-Article 61. And since the Crown holds no lawful authority, neither do its courts, enforcers, councils, or other agents.
Article 61 is a royal command. It calls upon us to distress the Crown and resist this unlawful regime — by peaceful means, of course. This includes reclaiming land and property if necessary. We are protected by “duress of circumstances,” which allows us to comply where necessary (e.g., to keep a car taxed if needed for daily life) without surrendering our position.
We also assert that we’re entitled to our lawful benefits — to be denied them would be coercion and theft by a treasonous system.
So, we address individuals as men or women, not as titles or offices. They, too, are bound by Article 61 and must stand under it when served with lawful notices. This is essential to our lawful rebellion. Only a united people, grounded in common law, can defeat the treason within.
Honour matters in law. So we always offer a chance to cure the situation. If someone ignores a properly served Notice of Conditional Acceptance, they tacitly accept the facts stated in it. If they reply without addressing the claims, that too is seen as agreement. If they openly reject the Constitution, they are guilty of sedition.
We are building a lawful case file for our defence and educating others along the way. If we are summoned, we conditionally accept — but only in a properly convened court de jure (i.e., under common law with a jury of our peers). No such courts currently exist in Britain, as all derive their authority from a Crown that no longer holds lawful power. Today’s courts are corporate, not lawful services.
The UK is meant to operate as a system of service to the people. We are sovereign individuals, and even the monarch is bound by oath and contract to serve the people through the coronation oath.
This approach is checkmate. Once we serve a Misprision of Treason Notice, the recipient can not claim ignorance of the crime. By law, they must report treason to a Justice of the Peace. Failing to do so makes them complicit.
Treason is handing over national authority to foreign powers without the explicit, informed consent of the people — or without losing it in an open battle.
Article 61 was invoked because QE2 ratified the treasonous Treaty of Nice (France). And no, we are not out of the EU. Triggering Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty only gives legitimacy to an unlawful arrangement. We should never use the enemy's tools to free ourselves.
Lastly, every English-speaking Commonwealth nation has a duty to stand under Article 61. If we unite, we can not only restore Britain and the Commonwealth to a just system, but we can bring justice to the untouchables — the corrupt politicians, the bankers, and the globalists — and hold a Constitutional Convention of the People to modernize and strengthen our Constitution.
I hope this gives a clearer understanding of the lawful remedy we use. Peaceful rebellion. Lawful dissent. Stand in honour.
If you would like to read the rest of David Robinsons Layman's Guide to Lawful Dissent, please refer to the comments for the link.
