10/09/2026
Dear parents,
We know many of you have been following the news this week about the Minister’s plan to remove the Social Disadvantage Criterion from pre-school admissions and we understand why some of you might welcome it. If you’ve missed out on your first-choice pre-school place or worried you might, this could feel like a policy that’s finally on your side.
We want to be honest with you: we empathise completely. We are all struggling with the Early Education and Childcare crisis, but we don’t think this policy actually
helps and we think it’s important that we explain why.
The reason the pre-school admissions system isn’t working well for families isn’t the SDC criterion, it’s that the Department has failed to deliver universal full-time early years education for everyone. Instead of fixing the root problem, the Minister is stripping away one of the only real supports in place for children from low income families, and dressing it up as help for ‘hardworkingparents.’
We think that framing is unfair and discriminatory.
Many parents on benefits are working too, often in low-paid jobs, and many more aren’tworking because they can’t, due to caring responsibilities, disability, unemployment or thesimple fact that childcare costs make workingimpossible - something many of you will relate to. Suggesting that parents on benefits aren’t hardworking isn’t just inaccurate, it’s an insultto families already doing everything they can in difficult circumstances.
But we also have to be clear: this policy isn’t about parents versus parents, it’s about children.
Evidence shows that children from low incomehouseholds already start school behind theirpeers, a gap that only widens as they movethrough the system. Removing this protectionnow, before full-time provision is genuinelyuniversal for every child, doesn’t level the playing field, it does the opposite.
The truth is that the Department is failing all of us by not delivering a genuinely universal system and by doing nothing to stop the rising cost of childcare. Pitting families against each other over a handful of admission places distracts from that failure, it doesn’t fix it.
We’ll be sharing a more detailed post soonsetting out exactly why we believe this policy isthe wrong answer, and what we think shouldhappen instead.
For now, we just ask that you look past the headline and consider who this decision will actually affect most: 3 and 4 year old children who don't have a voice, who don't have a vote and who don't have a choice.
Their families are socially disadvantaged because they’re facing health, care or financial vulnerabilities.
With solidarity,
Melted Parents