OratorsOracle

OratorsOracle Resources for Public Speakers

No, the audience is not like you.Because a discussion on this can easily digress into philosophy, let’s refrain from div...
02/02/2024

No, the audience is not like you.

Because a discussion on this can easily digress into philosophy, let’s refrain from diving too deeply into the relation between the speaker and the listener here – but as a baseline, if you think you have a lot in common with your audience: As a part of the very definition of public speaking, there is a fundamental difference between speaking and listening. The barrier between the active, public individual and the passive, anonymous group is exactly what we try to breach when we speak.

In the attempt to connect with our audiences, we often make the very risky mistake of assuming that they are just like us – which of course, to some extent is true. But due to the nature of the situation alone, you are most likely not like your audience.

The social projection bias or the egocentric bias (almost, but not quite the same - the discussion is ongoing) is the natural next place to move the spotlight after the fundamental attribution error and the consistency bias.

The egocentric bias is the tendency to think and believe that other people think like us, would do like us, and share the same emotions around the values that mean something to us. When we think about it, we instinctively know this not to be true, but when we make quick, heuristic decisions based on intuition, we act as if it was.

In fact, many speakers plan their presentations, their means, and their effects as if the audience has the same experience level, the same references, the same understandings, the same values and the same interests as themselves.

Obviously, this is only very rarely the case. Even in a very homogenous group, these assumptions come with a risk of transgressing cultural and social borders, or at the very least create noise in the messaging. In other words, for most people it takes an active effort to overcome the egocentric bias and understand your audience from the inside – but interviews, tag-alongs and research can bring you very far.

Understanding your audience does not come free, it will take legwork and empathy, but the connection you will be able to create is deeper, more credible and will elicit larger effect.

(Image: If we could see all the assumptions, we project to our audiences, maybe it would look like this beautiful stage performance piece. Considering every individual in the audience, with how they differ from your ideas, interests and experiences, as a relation you create when speaking, the complexity quickly becomes enormous.

Image credit: From the performance “Hakanai” by Adrien M & Claire B, next show at time of posting: Théatre André Malraux, Paris, France, February 10, 2024.)

Are you always what you think you are?The Consistency bias picks up where the fundamental attribution error left us. Coi...
01/02/2024

Are you always what you think you are?

The Consistency bias picks up where the fundamental attribution error left us. Coined by Sadler and Woody in 2003, this concept describes the cognitive effect of thinking that we always act in accordance with our self-image – that our self-expression is consistent over time and with our values and beliefs. In fact, for most people, it is not.

If we saw ourselves from the outside – all the time – then we would see things, that we wouldn’t see as “me”. Small actions, microaggressions, phrasings, even complete lines of arguing. The consistency bias states that we tend to think that we act more in accordance with our own values, than we really do.

In some ways, the consistency bias is the inward, inverted edition of the fundamental attribution error. Because we hold certain values dear, we tend to think that we carry them on the outside and that people can tell who we are – without explicating these values specifically.

And most of the time, this is true – from the general picture of what we are delivering to an audience, our values and beliefs will most often shine through wordings, topic choices and analytic perspectives – even the way we move.

But one of the reasons it feels so awkward to watch ourselves on video, is because we suddenly see a lot of small discrepancies clearly from the outside – like the rest of the world is seeing us.

What this means for public speaking is that we are not our own best audiences. You can’t really give yourself feedback. But you don’t need a professional trainer, if you have a trusted colleague or friend who is able to break down what you do, and help you to really see it from the outside – like your audience eventually will.

(Image: Seneca the Elder or Seneca the Rhetorician (54BCE-39CE) had a lot to say about mirrors – and it is likely that he rehearsed his speeches in front of one. Maybe as one of the first in history, as full-size mirrors probably weren’t around before his time. We may always have been trying to understand how the world sees us, but the first known mirrors to carry around – as opposed to, say, a lake – dates back to Anatolia (modern day Türkiye) around 8000 BCE.

While later mirrors were made of polished metal like this roman silver handpiece from around Senecas time, the earliest mirrors we know of were crafted from polished obsidian – a volcanic material resembling darkened glass. Wherever this material has been available, it has been used for mirrors – from the Mayan and Inca cultures over the early Mesopotamian cultures all the way to ancient China – “reflecting” how basic a human need it is to understand what we look like to the world. Image credit: The Met, NY, USA)

You are (not) what you do?The “fundamental attribution error” is one of the more serious biases – we all fall subject to...
31/01/2024

You are (not) what you do?

The “fundamental attribution error” is one of the more serious biases – we all fall subject to it, most of the time. The theory behind it states that we assume that what we see a person doing right now, defines that person to us.

In other words, we attribute momentary action to the foundational disposition of the character – who that person is and is not, not the content of the situation – what the circumstances seem to demand from that person. Crudely put, this is why social psychology differentiates between dispositional traits and situational states. Sometimes, we do things because of who we are, but sometimes we do things, because of the situation, we find ourselves in.

Of course, like everything else in psychology, these can’t be completely separated – how you do a thing will always be affected by your character, and no matter how strong and well-defined a personality you have, a special situation can push you beyond your usual expression repertoire.

The fundamental attribution error works both for us and against us as speakers. Moments of eloquence, rhythmic flow and clarity of shared insights produce a sensation in the audience of your proficiency – as a person – because of the fundamental attribution error. When this happens, your perceived credibility increases and with that, audience patience and openness. A good place to be.

On the other hand, patches of uncertainty, self-corrections, undermining body language and noise, carries the risk of being perceived as unprepared, poorly skilled and unengaged – as a person. This allows for phones to come out, or even for people to leave. From this point on, you would be hard pressed not to internalize that feeling of inadequateness, creating and maintaining an obviously vicious cycle of self-doubt, insecure expression and bad audience feedback.

To get in front of a bias that is indeed very fundamental – from an evolutionary perspective, we have always needed to be able to draw quick conclusions about people, based on what we see – only the oldest tool in the box will help: Preparation. Unless you are gifted (and probably less than 5-10% of voluntary public speakers can be considered natural talents, so most of us are not), you will have to rehearse – and when you do, focus on that all-important beginning that will allow you to connect with your audience from the get-go. To know more about why, look up the “Primacy and Recency effects” online or have a look at the post on the serial positioning effect. To learn more about how, stay tuned...

(Image: Since the first modern Olympics, medals have been used as a way to carry past actions into the present and elicit the fundamental attribution error in beholders - "This person has the stamina and the talent to win, this person is a winner!". Actually, this medal is a participation medal from the first modern Olympics in Athens in 1896, honouring the effort and the skills it takes to even make it to the Olympics. And just maybe it was meant to constitute a bit of promotion work as well... For some reason, laurels were deemed out of fashion as a visible sign of honour, but the link to the heritage is portrayed on the medal itself. Image credit olympic-museum.de)

The Serial Positioning EffectWhat we experience first and last in a situation, we remember far better than we remember a...
23/06/2023

The Serial Positioning Effect

What we experience first and last in a situation, we remember far better than we remember anything in between. This is called the “Primacy” and the “Recency” effect, collectively coined by the German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus as the “Serial Position Effect” back in 1885. (Did he meet Marty McFly?)

How we arrange our information has a big impact on how it is heard, accepted and not least, retained.

So when you plan your presentation, make sure that not only the first few moments are really well rehearsed, but also the last. Beginnings matter a lot. But so does endings!

Image: Copyright Universal Studios. From "Back to the Future 3", placed in 1885.

Opening the vast cupboard of cognitive effects, we begin with “The Anchoring Effect”: If I ask you: “Did you have an int...
16/06/2023

Opening the vast cupboard of cognitive effects, we begin with “The Anchoring Effect”:

If I ask you: “Did you have an interesting day?” or “Were you busy today?”, the answers could very well be the same in terms of factual content, describing what you did. But the anchoring effect tells us that it is very likely that you will think of very different answers, when asked these two similar, but very different questions.

How we frame a question – and a talk – has a big impact on message reception, acceptance and retention. By creating a reference point with a statement, a metaphor, an anecdote, a fact or maybe an object, you “anchor” the audience to something of your choice, that then becomes a baseline for your further reasoning.

Validated and qualified by Tversky and Kahneman in 1974, the anchoring bias (or effect, as we prefer) is an established cognitive effect that they suggested is part of a “anchor and adjust” heuristic, helping us make fast and reasonably safe decisions in many environments. In the big social game, ever since early apehood, it has been an advantage for anyone to quickly be able to judge a situation by only a few pieces of data. The first thing we hear in a specific context is a natural anchoring point for that analysis, and that is what we tap into, when we open a presentation with something remarkable, relevant and reasonable.

Image: Copy of a Roman anchor, built from Egyptian tradition. The oldest anchor found looks like this (only the stone is left, of course) is thought to be from around 3400 BCE. (Science Museum Group. https://collection.sciencemuseumgroup.org.uk/objects/co8358797/model-of-roman-anchor-model.)

The "Give-me-some-time-to-think-question"Ok, so yes. You may go blank or just forget a little part of your next line of ...
14/06/2023

The "Give-me-some-time-to-think-question"

Ok, so yes. You may go blank or just forget a little part of your next line of argument. You need time to regroup. To find back to that great way, you used to say the next... what was it?

And while you are up there thinking, the audience is waiting, right? So you don't allow yourself time to think. You rush on, letting go of that great line, you used to know, and just try to survive the next five minutes. Right?

Don't. By having a question ready for your audience, that you can activate at any time, you can buy yourself a moment to let the words form in your mind.

So what could it be? Maybe something like: "I'd like you to briefly turn to the person next to you and try to answer the question together - how does this impact us? I'll just give a moment." Or: "I'd like to invite you to reflect for a brief moment on what you expect from today", if it is early in the presentation - "Now, let's take a short minute to reflect about the points, I have just made. Is there anything missing?".

Or you can go more topic-relevant, like: "Reflecting on next year's budget, what do you consider the single most important thing to change/follow up on/discuss?" - depending of course on what your presentation is about.

When you have found your feet again, taken a breath and let the words reconnect in your mind, at some point, it's always nice to follow up on the question - either by addressing it yourself: "I consider the single most important budget line to discuss..." or by asking an audience member, if the format allows for that. That will make your first question appear very planned and prepared.

Buy yourself time - activate your audience! Questions are only one way of doing it - more on that later...

Time for the last and maybe most over-looked way to complete destroy an otherwise perfectly surviable presentation:"Bear...
24/12/2022

Time for the last and maybe most over-looked way to complete destroy an otherwise perfectly surviable presentation:

"Bear no gifts"

You don’t really have anything to say.

Nothing to really bring to the table, you don’t exactly come bearing gifts. So there really is no reason for you to be standing there, and yet, here you are.

The worst presentations are the giftless ones – when you have nothing you really want to share with other people, nothing you are
proud of teaching others, nothing to really give, it makes for a spectacular defeat.

But don’t worry, no one will remember, they would all have been busy looking at their phones or planning the rest of their day. It is Christmas, after all, lots to do…

Image: The Telegraph

Another favorite is the 23rd of "24 ways to obliterate an otherwise great piece of information dumping":"Just look at th...
24/12/2022

Another favorite is the 23rd of "24 ways to obliterate an otherwise great piece of information dumping":

"Just look at those slides!"

It’s so comforting to look at those beautiful slides you made, isn’t? And if you turn away from us, we will never know what it is you wanted us to know.

We won’t hear your valid points, we can’t see your dedication and we will quickly begin to wonder about that email or the next meeting.

So another classic way of killing attention and interest is just to
turn your back to us and keep looking at those beautiful slides.

Just look at them. Beautiful, right?

Photo: Iconicons

This is a fundamental "must-have" when connecting to an audience. When researchers test audibility with masked, clear-speaking presenters, just two dots on a neutral, featureless full-mask is enough to ensure that we can understand what is being said. But we need those dots - also called eyes. With no features at all on a full-mask, audibility was remarkably impaired at the same volume, with the same actor, from the same position.

Now for number 22 of the 24 ways to utterly undermine yourself and any future hopes of ever presenting again:"It’s all a...
24/12/2022

Now for number 22 of the 24 ways to utterly undermine yourself and any future hopes of ever presenting again:

"It’s all about you"

Of course everyone wants to know what you think about the whole thing. And make your introduction slide very informative, we need to know your full life story and how you got here – and what
you have been doing here for so long, and what you do in your spare time.

If this is not your first day with new colleagues, you will have worn everyone out way before you get to any meaningful point.

Number 21 of the 24 ways to negotiate your way out of ever presenting to an audience again:"I already sent you the slide...
24/12/2022

Number 21 of the 24 ways to negotiate your way out of ever presenting to an audience again:

"I already sent you the slide deck"

“Did you have time to see it?” If they did, what are you going to bring? You are lucky they are even there.

And if they didn't, they now know that they won't have to listen to a word, you are saying, because they can just go home and read it all. Or they can have it all to the very last slide after about 1½ minute.

So don't be too surprised to see those distant gazes or sneaky mail checks going on pretty soon after that first sentence: "I already sent you the slide deck"

One of our favorites is the 20th of the 24 ways to destroy an otherwise fine speech:"Rehearsals are for amateurs"Sure yo...
24/12/2022

One of our favorites is the 20th of the 24 ways to destroy an otherwise fine speech:

"Rehearsals are for amateurs"

Sure you can do it without rehearsing it.

You know everything there is to know, you will drive home your points efficiently, time your effects perfectly, and be inspirational, ‘authentic’ and informative at the same time. With time for questions.

It’s just a management meeting. Rehearsals are for amateurs!

Painting: Edgar Degas: The rehearsal, ca. 1873?

Adresse

Copenhagen

Internet side

Underretninger

Vær den første til at vide, og lad os sende dig en email, når OratorsOracle sender nyheder og tilbud. Din e-mail-adresse vil ikke blive brugt til andre formål, og du kan til enhver tid afmelde dig.

Del