26/04/2026
CHERNOBYL 40 years.
Today, April 26, 2026, it is 40 years since Chernobyl reactor 4 exploded in the most serious nuclear power disaster to date. Now, 40 years later, there is still a closed zone of 30 km in diameter with radioactive hotspots. The destroyed reactor itself still contains a lot of radioactive material and is shielded by a so-called sarcophagus, which, if all goes well, can last for 100 years. After that, our descendants will build a new one for the next 100 years and so on. And unfortunately, all is not well with the sarcophagus: a hole was already punched in the sarcophagus in a Russian drone attack on February 14, 2025 (see picture).
In the rest of Europe, where large amounts of radioactive material were dispersed, there have been restrictions on the use of mutton meat as far away as Wales until 2012 due to the radioactivity of the meat. And in Ukraine and Belarus alone, the cost of the disaster is estimated at $384 billion for the first 30 years, according to estimations by UNDP and UNICEF with UNOCHA and WHO (2002). This is equivalent to 80% of the Danish annual GDP.
Have we learned anything from the Chernobyl disaster?
We have been taught someone about nuclear power safety; but we should learn that the owners of the nuclear power plants must pay for the costs they cause, so that innocent people are not again made to pay for costs corresponding to the Danish annual GDP, as happened with the Chernobyl disaster. Unfortunately, in most countries the liability is limited to less than 1% of the costs caused by Chernobyl, so there is a long way to go. We can also learn that the location far from larger cities had the advantage that there were only smaller towns that had to be evacuated. Now nuclear power supporters, in particular supporter of the small-and middle sized SMR’s, want to place nuclear power plants in harbours and near cities. So they obviously do not want to learn from the experience and instead expose many citizens to the risk of living close to a nuclear power plant.
Let us use the anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster to consider if it is really a good idea to build more nuclear power plants or rather choose a transition away from fossil fuels with safer alternatives? This consideration must also include the fact that renewable energy sources and energy efficiency today are both much cheaper and far faster to establish than nuclear power.
INFORSE Don't nuke the climate Чернобыль 40 / Chernobyl 40 Chernobyl Gunnar B Olesen VedvarendeEnergi Global 100% RE Global 100% RE Ukraine