30/09/2026
Ibinasura ng Korte Suprema ang mga petisyon na isantabi ang boto ng Senate Impeachment Court hinggil sa 2/3 threshold, o ang bilang ng Senador na kailangan para ma-impeach si VP Sara Duterte, dahil sa teknikalidad ng mga nagsampa ng petisyon.
The (SC) 𝘌𝘯 𝘉𝘢𝘯𝘤, during its session today, September 30, 2026, dismissed the petitions filed by Victor D. Rodriguez, Berteni Cataluña Causing, and Atty. Ernesto B. Francisco, Jr., challenging the Senate Impeachment Court’s interpretation of the two-thirds vote required to convict in an impeachment case, due to procedural grounds including lack of standing and prematurity.
On September 23, 2026, the Senate Impeachment Court ruled that the phrase “all the Members of the Senate” under Article XI, Section 3(6) of the Constitution refers only to senators who are legally and actually able to participate in the impeachment proceedings at the time of the vote.
Rodriguez argued that the Impeachment Court effectively amended the Constitution by adding a qualification not found in its text. He asked the SC to nullify the ruling and declare that any change to Article XI, Section 3(6) must go through the constitutional process for amendment or revision. He also sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the implementation of the ruling.
Causing argued that senators who remain in office should still be counted even if they are in hiding, detained, or medically unable to attend. He prayed for the issuance of a status quo ante order (SQAO) and/or TRO to stop any final vote on Vice President Sara Z. Duterte’s conviction while his petition was pending. He also sought to compel Senators Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada, Jr., Rodante Marcoleta, and Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa to participate in the impeachment trial and the Senate to take the necessary steps to secure their attendance.
Francisco similarly argued that because the Constitution provides for a 24-member Senate, conviction requires the concurrence of at least 16 senator-judges. He maintained that senators who are detained, on medical leave, or temporarily absent remain members of the Senate and should therefore be counted. He also asked for an SQAO pending the resolution of his petition.
The dismissal of the petitions was based on procedural grounds such as lack of standing and prematurity, among others.
Read the full text of the Press Briefer at https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/?p=174115
Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution
