31/03/2026
On 26 March 2026, the Social Cohesion Forum took place in Chișinău, Moldova, bringing together policymakers, practitioners, and community actors to reflect on the state of social cohesion in Moldova and what comes next.
The event was hosted by United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Population Fund, and Swisspeace, convening national and international stakeholders.
Opening remarks were delivered by:
* Guido Beltrani, Swiss Cooperation Office in Moldova
* Daniela Gasparikova, UNDP Moldova Resident Representative
* Karina Nersesyan, UNFPA Representative in Moldova
The high-level panel featured:
* Dumitru Pîslaru, General Secretary Ministry of Labour and Social Protection
* Gal Harmat, swisspeace
* Ilke Dagli Hustings, Centre for Sustainable Peace and Democratic Development
* Alex Petrov, Director of the National Youth Agency
The forum included presentations and discussions drawing on findings from SeeD’s SCORE and STMM tools, alongside reflections from community and institutional stakeholders.
A key message that emerged:
Moldova’s main fault lines are not ethnic or linguistic. They sit in the relationship between citizens and the state.
Across the evidence:
* Intergroup relations remain relatively strong and stable
* Political positions and orientations are the deepest cleavages between people abd groups
* Confidence in institutions, and that they are responsive, accountable an care for common good remain low
* Economic hardship and corruption continue to be ranked as the main sources of societal tensions
Further, panel discussions placed strong emphasis on stereotypes, not just as perceptions, but as forces that shape behaviours, reinforce divisions, and influence policy choices.
One major core takeaway from the forum:
Measurement is what keeps cohesion work grounded and actionable.
Without continuous measurement, responses risk targeting outdated risks and missing emerging drivers. Repeated measurements keep the discussion anchored in evidence, trends, and specific localities or groups rather than in impressions, intuitions or politicized narratives. Given scarce resources, narrow windows of opportunity for real positive change, and prevalent fatigue, disappointment and cynicism among the people, we cannot afford not being ‘precise’.
The conversation also explored youth engagement. Online spaces can expand access, connection, and participation. At the same time, they can amplify polarisation, misinformation, and grievance as the SCORE previously found out. So the answer is not to treat youth online presence as inherently good or bad. The real issue is whether young people also have critical media literacy, spaces for structured dialogue, and attractive offline avenues for meaningful participation. The question is not whether youth are online, but whether the surrounding ecosystem turns that exposure into participation or division.
Looking ahead, priorities include:
* inclusive and participatory governance
* economic security and service delivery
* structured civic engagement
* critical media literacy
Read more here: https://www.scoreforpeace.org/en/moldova/datasets
Stay tuned for the latest ECoST analytical reports coming soon.
UNDP Moldova UNFPA UNFPA Moldova swisspeace