Environmental Transparency Committee ETC

Directions Website Contact the organization

Environmental Transparency Committee ETC We are dedicated to preserving the environment, ecosystem & integrity of Port au Port Peninsula.

The Environmental Transparency Committee is a Non-Government Organization (NGO). We are dedicated to preserving the ecosystem and the environment integrity of Port au Port Peninsula by opposing the installation and construction of Industrial Wind Turbines. Newfoundland is extremely unique in preserving its significant rare and endangered species that are at risk. We are famous for our French Ancestral Route, Coastal Limestone Barrens, and the scenic loop that has attracted so many tourists worldwide. We believe in green energy, however, the environmental impact the Windmill Project would have on our peninsula would be catastrophic and irreparable. Are we willing to risk our future generations for a short-term economical possibility?

09/02/2026

CBC Newfoundland Morning Segment
Aired August 31, 2026**

The Port au Port Peninsula Research Group from UPEI is meeting with residents this week to talk openly about the future of the region. Led by Dr. Nick Mercer, the team is sharing new research and gathering community feedback on the Peninsula’s long‑term needs, strengths, and opportunities. Their goal is to support a community‑driven vision for Port au Port — one shaped by local voices, informed by solid evidence, and grounded in the realities of life on the Peninsula.(Kevin J Phillips)

Community Conversation — Cape St. GeorgeFrench Centre • 2 September 2026 • 6:00–7:30 PMTonight’s session gives Port au P...
09/02/2026

Community Conversation — Cape St. George
French Centre • 2 September 2026 • 6:00–7:30 PM

Tonight’s session gives Port au Port residents a chance to speak openly about the Peninsula’s future. After years of stalled development and uncertainty, the focus is on local control, solid research, and community‑driven planning. Audio will be recorded anonymously to support honest, safe input as the community works to shape its own path forward.

ETC Statement — Port au Port Peninsula 23 August 2026Although this photo of the Port au Port Peninsula is stunningly bea...
08/23/2026

ETC Statement — Port au Port Peninsula 23 August 2026

Although this photo of the Port au Port Peninsula is stunningly beautiful, it also looks cold and exposed — a reminder of what happens when too many trees are taken away. Trees protect this land from harsh winds, erosion, and the changing climate. Without them, the peninsula loses both warmth and resilience.

This is not just any landscape. It is home to French, Acadian, and Indigenous peoples, whose families have lived here for generations. Their cultures, histories, and livelihoods are tied to the forests, the coastline, and the land that surrounds them.

Yet for decades, industry has clear‑cut large areas of the peninsula without replanting, leaving the land vulnerable and the communities without the protection healthy forests provide. Each missing tree represents a loss — ecological, cultural, and historical.

The Environmental Transparency Committee believes it is time to reverse that pattern.

We need to plant more trees on the peninsula, restore what has been taken, and protect the land for the people who call it home.

This place deserves to remain strong, green, and alive for future generations. (Kevin J Phillips)

ETC — 23 AUGUST 2026Statement from the Environmental Transparency Committee, Port au Port PeninsulaTURNING IT GREEN AGAI...
08/23/2026

ETC — 23 AUGUST 2026

Statement from the Environmental Transparency Committee, Port au Port Peninsula

TURNING IT GREEN AGAIN

What Gros Morne’s 1.25‑Million‑Tree Replanting Effort Reveals About NL’s Forest Future — And Why Port au Port Must Act Now
A Province Trying to Heal Its Land

Across Newfoundland and Labrador, the consequences of environmental imbalance are becoming impossible to ignore. In Gros Morne National Park, years of moose overbrowsing stripped large areas of forest bare, forcing scientists to launch one of the province’s largest ecological recovery efforts — planting 1.25 million trees to rebuild damaged forests and strengthen climate resilience.

This massive undertaking is more than a restoration project. It is a warning. It shows how quickly a landscape can be altered when pressures go unmanaged — and how much work is required to repair the damage.

Across NL, vegetation is being removed faster than it is restored. Industrial clear‑cutting, quarry and road expansion, mineral exploration, hydro and wind project preparation, and climate‑driven wildfire impacts continue to reshape the province’s forests. Replanting helps, but it cannot keep pace with the rate of disturbance.

The Environmental Transparency Committee believes this imbalance is already visible — and increasingly consequential — on the Port au Port Peninsula.

Port au Port: A Land at a Crossroads
The ETC has documented multiple signs of unmanaged land‑use on the peninsula:

large‑scale clearing for industrial proposals,

road widening and heavy‑equipment corridors,

exploration activity with no restoration plan,

watercourse disruption, and

tree removal that outpaces meaningful replanting.

These impacts are cumulative. Each project may seem small, but together they reshape the peninsula’s landscape, identity, and long‑term ecological stability.

The ETC maintains that Port au Port must shift from reaction to prevention. That requires:

transparent land‑use planning before clearing begins,

community consultation as a first step,

mandatory restoration plans for any industrial disturbance,

public reporting on cumulative environmental impacts.

Every acre cleared must come with a plan — not only for what will be built, but for what will be restored.

Why It Matters Now
Port au Port stands at a turning point. With increasing interest in industrial and energy projects, the decisions made today will shape the peninsula for decades.

“Turning it green again” is not just a slogan. It is a commitment to stewardship — and a reminder that the land can recover, but only if restoration becomes part of the process, not an afterthought.

The ETC will continue advocating for transparency, accountability, and responsible land‑use practices to protect the peninsula’s future.

Why These Sessions Matter for the Port au Port PeninsulaThe Port au Port Peninsula is at a crossroads (no pun intended)....
08/11/2026

Why These Sessions Matter for the Port au Port Peninsula
The Port au Port Peninsula is at a crossroads (no pun intended). After years of uncertainty, stalled development promises, and community frustration, these sessions offer something the region rarely gets: a structured, evidence‑based conversation led by people who are actually studying the Peninsula’s assets, needs, and future options.

Three things make these meetings important:

They shift the conversation from outside agendas to local control.
The idea of a Community‑Owned Trust is a major departure from the top‑down development models that have repeatedly failed the region. It puts ownership, decision‑making, and long‑term benefit directly in the hands of residents.

They bring real research to the table.
The Water–Energy–Food Security Project and the Asset‑Based Community Development work are not political talking points — they’re data‑driven assessments of what the Peninsula actually has, what it needs, and what it can build. This is the first time in years that community planning is being grounded in research instead of speculation.

They create a safe space for residents to speak openly.
Audio recording without identifying attendees encourages honest input. After the Nujio’qonik experience, people need a forum where they can speak without fear of being singled out, pressured, or misrepresented.

In short, these sessions matter because they’re not just meetings — they’re the beginning of a community‑led reset. A chance for Port au Port to define its own future instead of having it defined by external developers, political actors, or corporate interests.
(Kevin J Phillips)

ETC Statement - "25 June 2026" The Ogallala Aquifer is a warning.The same risks are now visible on the WEST COAST OF NL ...
06/25/2026

ETC Statement - "25 June 2026"

The Ogallala Aquifer is a warning.
The same risks are now visible on the WEST COAST OF NL — including PORT AU PORT.

The Environmental Transparency Coalition (ETC) is raising renewed concern about the long‑term protection of groundwater on the Port au Port Peninsula and the broader West Coast of Newfoundland. Recent reporting from the United States highlights the rapid depletion of the Ogallala Aquifer — the largest groundwater supply in the country — which provides nearly one‑third of all irrigation water and supports a fifth of U.S. agricultural output. Water levels in parts of the Ogallala have dropped more than 200 feet, with recharge rates of less than one inch per year, leaving scientists warning that the system is being “mined” faster than nature can replenish it.

While the scale differs, the pattern is the same: when governments prioritize industrial development over hydrological science, groundwater becomes the first casualty. Here on the Port au Port Peninsula, we have already seen the consequences of insufficient oversight — from quarry operations in Lower Cove, to government‑subsidized industrial proposals for wind‑tower cement and green‑energy infrastructure, to the WEGH2 road cuts that disrupted water supplies in Mainland. These events demonstrate how quickly fragile coastal aquifers can be altered, contaminated, or permanently reduced.

The ETC asserts that Newfoundland and Labrador cannot afford to repeat the mistakes seen across the Great Plains. Groundwater is slow to heal, and once compromised, it may take centuries to recover — if it recovers at all. We call on the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador to implement mandatory hydrological impact assessments, transparent public reporting, and enforceable restoration requirements for all industrial activity on the peninsula. The Ogallala Aquifer shows what happens when oversight fails. We must ensure the same fate does not unfold here. (Kevin J Phillips)

06/24/2026

ETC: 24 June 2026
Unproven Projects, Ideological Narratives: A National Warning That Mirrors Local Concerns

Recent national testimony echoes the concerns raised in both the ETC statement and the Port au Port Chronicle’s analysis. As MLI Senior Fellow Christian Leuprecht warned at the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, political actors are increasingly framing energy debates as a simplistic “good versus bad” choice — pushing ideological narratives instead of evidence‑based planning. The Brook–Fengling proposal fits this pattern: a high‑profile announcement with no confirmed site, no environmental disclosures, and no demonstrated substance. This broader national context reinforces why west‑coast communities must insist on transparency, environmental facts, and accountability before accepting yet another unproven industrial project. (Kevin J Phillips)
-----------------------------------------

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1744161730097318

ETC: 23 June 2026 West‑coast residents have seen this pattern before — big promises, little proof, and lasting environme...
06/24/2026

ETC: 23 June 2026

West‑coast residents have seen this pattern before — big promises, little proof, and lasting environmental consequences. Do you believe projects like this should face full environmental review before any funding or site approval? Share your thoughts below — transparency starts with public voices.

Are We Being Fooled Again by Another Unproven Industrial Project?”

The Environment Transparency Committee (ETC) is raising serious concerns about yet another large‑scale industrial proposal appearing without the environmental substance, public disclosure, or factual grounding that west‑coast communities deserve. We have seen this pattern before: big announcements, foreign partnerships, and promises of “clean energy” — but no confirmed site, no confirmed customer, no environmental assessment, and not even a basic rendering of what is being proposed.

When a project arrives out of the blue, with no emissions data, no water‑use information, no dust‑control plan, no traffic analysis, and no explanation of how concrete manufacturing — one of the world’s highest‑emission industries — will be managed, the public is right to ask whether we are being asked to trust another unproven venture.

West‑coast communities — including Corner Brook, Stephenville, Kippens, and Port au Port — have already carried the burden of speculative “green” projects that collapsed under scrutiny. We will not accept vague promises while environmental risks are ignored.

The ETC’s position is clear: Transparency must come before trust, and environmental facts must come before industrial ambition. Until full environmental, logistical, and financial details are released, this project remains a concept — not a commitment.

The ETC will continue to demand clear answers and defend the environmental integrity of our region. (Kevin J Phillips)

---------------
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1744161730097318

ETC: 20 Feb 2026Developers Walk Away — And Port au Port Is Left Holding the Damage… Again.The latest VOCM report confirm...
02/20/2026

ETC: 20 Feb 2026

Developers Walk Away — And Port au Port Is Left Holding the Damage… Again.

The latest VOCM report confirms what residents of the Port au Port Peninsula have been saying for years: these wind‑to‑hydrogen mega‑projects were pushed ahead without transparency, without accountability, and without respect for the people who live here.

Before any approval was granted, our land was already disturbed — clear‑cutting, heavy equipment near watersheds, and damage to sensitive areas. Elders who stood up peacefully to protect their land were taken to court instead of being heard. No community should ever be treated this way.

Some individuals within the community chose to support the developer behind closed doors, attending private meetings and private trips while the rest of the peninsula was kept in the dark. These actions deepened division and eroded trust.

Now that major companies have lost their Crown land reserves for failing to pay required fees, the question remains: who will repair the damage already done? Will the developer take responsibility, or will the provincial government finally enforce accountability?

I want to acknowledge the leadership of our co‑administrators, Nadine Tallack and Marilyn Rowe, along with the unwavering support of the entire committee and the residents of the Port au Port Peninsula. As always, from the very beginning, the ETC’s resolve has been clear: we stand with our community and we continue to insist on real oversight, real protection, and real transparency. Our commitment has not wavered, and it will not. We will not be silenced, and we will not forget what this community has endured.

- By Kevin J Phillips

ETC: 1 February 2026As Ottawa faces new allegations over the handling of green‑energy funds, it’s hard not to see parall...
02/02/2026

ETC: 1 February 2026

As Ottawa faces new allegations over the handling of green‑energy funds, it’s hard not to see parallels with the concerns raised during the WEGH2 process here in Newfoundland and Labrador.

The article outlining these federal issues was published on November 11, 2024, yet it received almost no public attention. A matter involving significant public funding, political accusations, and questions from the RCMP should have prompted broader discussion. It's quiet release raises legitimate concerns about transparency and communication.

At the federal level, accusations surrounding the so‑called “green slush fund” have led to disputes over documents, oversight, and accountability. While nothing has been proven in court, the public sees uncertainty and political conflict — and trust inevitably suffers.

Here in NL, many residents experienced similar concerns during the WEGH2 process. Although there is no evidence of personal benefit to provincial leaders, the government’s early and enthusiastic support for the project created the perception that the outcome was predetermined. Community questions about land use, environmental impact, and local effects often felt secondary to economic messaging.

Different governments and different circumstances, but a common issue: when decision‑making appears unbalanced or opaque, public confidence erodes.

Canadians — whether in Ottawa or on the Port au Port Peninsula — deserve transparent, community‑centered processes that respect the people most affected. Trust is built through openness and accountability, and many feel that trust has been weakened.

— Kevin J Phillips

Address

Port Au Port
Port Au Port, NL

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Environmental Transparency Committee ETC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Environmental Transparency Committee ETC:

Shortcuts

Share