Science policy can be divided up into 2 broad categories: Science for policy and policy for science. What does this mean?
1. Science for policy is when evidence is used to inform decisions. Let’s say, hypothetically, the Canadian government announces that they will use 5 million dollars in federal funding to subsidize gym memberships to promote healthier Canadians. Although this sounds great, th
is brings up a lot of questions. Is this the most effective way to promote health? Why not subsidize bikes and canoes? Are there statistics that show this is what people want? Science for policy provides evidence to determine the most effective course of action and shapes policy decisions. Science for policy looks to improve the collaboration between scientists and policy makers in the policy development process.
2. Policy for science is when policies created to increase research, fund science, and stimulate innovation. For example, in Canada, it is known that women are underrepresented in the fields of science and technology. In order to address the gender gap, the Federal government has allotted funding for women in the form of scholarships, grants, youth programs, and/or mentorships. Policy for science is used in the form of funding to fulfill certain innovation initiatives and fill gaps in areas of policy. In general, funding science and innovation is crucial to a country’s growth. Science Policy touches on a broad range of subjects including:
• The importance of basic and applied research in EVERY field from engineering and design to molecular biology;
• Security (e.g. emergency preparedness, national defence);
• International relations and negotiations (science diplomacy and trade negotiations);
• Health and safety (e.g. regulatory regimes, safety of products);
• Environmental protection; and
• Foresight and emerging issues. Interested? Have additional questions? Email us at [email protected].
