11/27/2025
Please consider supporting our local Conservation Authority (the Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority - LTVCA) by Commenting on the ERO posting of the Proposed Regional Consolidation of Ontario’s Conservation Authorities. (see below for link) Our Lower Thames Valley Conservation FOUNDATION works in partnership with the Lower Thames Valley Conservation AUTHORITY (LTVCA), helping to raise funds to encourage wise management of our renewable natural resources, including providing opportunities for public education about the environment.
For more information check out https://lowerthames-conservation.on.ca/ltvca-board-resolution-on-provincial-plan-to-consolidate/
Submit your comments today at ero.ontario.ca/notice/025-1257
I, strongly oppose the proposed boundaries for the regional consolidation of Ontario’s Conservation Authorities.
The proposed changes will erode accountability and local services, impose significant costs on taxpayers, and cause delays for landowners, builder and developers.
Conservation Authorities are an integral part of our communities. They provide many programs and services including but not limited to:
Outdoor recreation opportunities
Emergency flood management
Rural and urban stewardship funding for landowners
Agricultural programs for local farmers
Experiential learning through education initiatives
These services are vital and cannot be effectively delivered under a consolidated model.
If this transition proceeds, local accountability will be severely diminished.
From Kitchener- Waterloo to Windsor, small municipalities and rural areas will lose their voices and may be forced to pay for services that are no longer relevant to their community.
While Ontario’s housing needs are clear, consolidating 36 Conservation Authorities into seven is not the solution. For example, the proposed Lake Erie Region Conservation Authority (LERCA) would encompass eight watersheds and 80 municipalities, each relying on local expertise to protect investments and manage development.
Consolidation will create delays, as decisions move to a higher level agency, preventing local planners from working directly with developers and builders.
Responses to ERO Questions
1. A successful transition requires a board structure that ensures representation from all municipalities. It is essential to preserve local presence including; offices, staff, programs, and services to maintain accountability, minimize transition costs, and avoid
delays in permitting. Under the current Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) boundary model, many RCAs are too large to provide adequate accountability to taxpayers.
2. The proposed RCA framework offers little benefit to taxpayers and would result in significant costs. Larger RCAs reduce accountability to municipalities within their boundaries. While there may be potential benefits in standardizing policies for planning,
permitting, and human resources, these improvements could be achieved without changing boundaries.
3. Governance should include representation from all municipalities within an RCA. However, some proposed RCAs include over 40 and up to 80 municipalities, making individual representation impractical. The proposed boundaries would create additional
layers of government, increase costs, and cause delays in permitting. Smaller RCA boundaries would improve accountability, reduce costs, and ensure permits are processed within acceptable timelines.
4. The proposed Lake Erie Region Conservation Authority (LERCA) includes 80 municipalities, making full representation impossible under this model. To maintain transparency and consultative budgeting, smaller regions should be considered. Reduced boundaries would ensure accountability to taxpayers and maintain
transparency for local municipalities.
5. Currently, many Conservation Authorities have strong relationships with local communities and stakeholders, built through years of authentic engagement and transparent practices. These relationships have developed through ongoing interaction,
volunteer support, and community partnerships. To maintain and strengthen these connections, it is critical to keep local offices, staff, programs, and services, and to continue honoring agreements related to donations, volunteers, and local initiatives.
The Province of Ontario proposes to consolidate Ontario’s 36 Conservation Authorities into seven regional entities under Bill 68, Plan to Protect Ontario Act (Budget Measures), 2025. The plan, announced by Environment Minister Todd McCarthy on October 31, includes creating an Ontario Provincial Conservation Agency to oversee the amalgamation and consult on proposed boundaries.
The LTVCA Board had many concerns with the proposed boundary change, especially in regards to geographical size. The current LTVCA board has representation from all 10 member municipalities, however under the proposed boundaries the Lake Erie Regional Conservation Authority Board would represent and make decisions for 80 municipalities. The main concern was accountability from the Regional Conservation Authority to the local municipalities. Local service delivery is critical to maintaining on the ground services to builders, developers and residents. The creation of a huge regional conservation authority will not only decrease accountability but increase bureaucracy, costs and timelines for local communities.
The Provincial goals for consistent permit approval processes, shared services, and digital modernization can be realized by the current Conservation Authority structure without imposing a new top-down agency structure without strong local accountability and increased costs to taxpayers.
On November 20, 2025 the LTVCA held a special board meeting by request from the Chair. It's main point of discussion was the Province’s proposal to con ...
