05/13/2026
We're challenging the Alberta Energy Regulator’s (AER) decision to terminate the Mine 14 public hearing are urging the Alberta Court of Appeal to restore public confidence by reinstating the hearing process.
In a finalized legal argument filed Tuesday, the organizations are asking the Court to revoke the approvals allowing Mine 14 to operate.
ℹ️ Read more: https://cpawsnab.org/all-news/alberta-conservation-groups-challenge-aers-unprecedented-cancellation-of-mine-14-hearing/
Don’t you love it when a new, moratorium-exempt coal mine gets the go-ahead from the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), after it had pulled the plug a public hearing because the AER CEO said so? ❤️
That’s what happened with . It was an unprecedented, unilateral decision that overturned that of independent commissioners.
And it was neither the AER CEO’s — nor the coal company’s — decision to make.
So we’re joining the legal team leading the challenge against it — alongside Napoli Law and on behalf of both the Alberta Wilderness Association (AWA) and CPAWS Northern Alberta.
LEARN MORE >> https://bit.ly/4uFagzo
Ecojustice lawyer Susanne Calabrese said: “Public hearings are one of the few ways Albertans can learn the true impacts of coal mining in our Rocky Mountains. Our regulators are meant to stand with the public — not behind closed doors with the industries they oversee. By cancelling the Mine 14 public hearing after a coal company asked them to do so, the AER has raised serious questions about transparency and accountability. All Albertans should be wondering: what is the CEO trying to hide?”
“In his decision to cancel the Mine 14 public hearing, [AER CEO Rob] Morgan appointed himself the de facto judge, jury, and executioner in regulating resource development in Alberta,” said Kennedy Halvorson, AWA Conservation specialist. “It should concern everyone that despite the checks and balances meant to be in place, and the separation of powers supposedly inherent in Alberta’s governing and regulatory processes, one person would assume absolute authority to veto public participation. It is a dangerous precedent we must challenge; the implications otherwise are serious.”
“Albertans have been promised over and over again that our environment and our water are being well taken care of by the regulator. If the companies seeking to profit off Alberta’s landscape are whispering in the ear of the CEO to get what they want, there is a clear conflict of interest,” says Tara Russell, program director at CPAWS Northern Alberta. “This is a breakdown of public trust in the process. We are challenging the decision because we deserve better, and our water and wildlife deserves better.”