07/01/2026
PART 1: FOUNDATIONS & PURPOSE
DAY 3/68
THE CONSTITUTION AS SUPREME LAW
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Constitutional Supremacy
a. The Constitution of Botswana is the highest law of the land.
b. This means that all public power in Botswana must originate from the Constitution and must be exercised within its limits. No authority exists independently of the Constitution.
2.2. What Does “Supreme Law” Mean?
Supremacy means that:
a. No Act of Parliament may override the Constitution;
b. No President, Minister, or public official may act above the Constitution;
c. No policy, directive, or government decision has legal force if it contradicts the Constitution.
🛎 Note:
Even Presidential Directives are subordinate to the Constitution. In Tapela and Another v Attorney-General and Others, the Court held that Presidential Directive CAB 5(b) of 2004 was not a legislative enactment and had no force of law in the absence of statutory authority. This means that, unless there is a specific law that expressly authorises the President or Cabinet to make statutory instruments, Presidential Directives, by and of themselves, do not have binding legal force.
d. Where there is a conflict between the Constitution and any other law or action, the Constitution always prevails.
2.3 Supremacy Applies to Everyone
Constitutional supremacy binds:
a. Parliament, when making laws
The legislative power of Parliament is expressly exercised “subject to the provisions of this Constitution”;
b. The Executive, when governing and spending public funds
Section 47 vests executive power of Botswana in the President, but expressly provides that such power is exercised “subject to the provisions of this Constitution”;
c. The Judiciary, when interpreting and applying the law;
d. All public institutions and officials;
📌 Good intentions do not cure unconstitutional conduct.
📌 Legality—not convenience—is the constitutional standard.
3. What Happens When the Constitution Is Violated?
3.1 Legal Consequences of Unconstitutionality
When a law or government action is inconsistent with the Constitution:
a. The courts have a duty to declare it invalid ❌️
b. The fact that Parliament enacted it or the Executive approved it does not save it
📌 Constitutional compliance is not optional.
3.2 Judicial Review Is Not Political Interference
The power of courts to strike down unconstitutional conduct is not political interference—it is constitutional enforcement.
4. Why Constitutional Supremacy Matters to Citizens
Constitutional supremacy:
a. Protects citizens from abuse of power;
b. Ensures government acts under law, not personal authority;
c. Makes rights enforceable rather than symbolic;
d. Allows unconstitutional conduct to be challenged and corrected.
📌 Without supremacy, the Constitution would be a political document.
📌With supremacy, it is a binding legal shield.
5. Practical Examples of Constitutional Supremacy in Botswana
5.1 Citizenship Through the Father Only 🚹
Attorney-General v Dow
a. One of the clearest affirmations of constitutional supremacy arose in Attorney-General v Dow;
b. At the time, Botswana’s citizenship laws discriminated between men and women, allowing Botswana men—but not Botswana women—to automatically pass their Botswana citizenship to their children, but not the mother's.
c. This discrimination was entrenched in statute and long-standing legal practice
d. The Court of Appeal held that:
i) The Constitution is supreme over all laws, including Acts of Parliament;
ii) Any law that violates constitutional rights is invalid, even if it reflects tradition or legislative choice;
iii) Equality and non-discrimination are binding constitutional standards.
📌The discriminatory provisions were struck down for inconsistency with the constitutional guarantee of equality.
5.2 Forced Renunciation of Citizenship at Age 21
Sithabile P. Mathe & Others v Attorney-General (2022)
a. In 2022, the High Court struck down sections 15(1) and 15(4) of the Citizenship Act
b. These provisions required children born to one non-citizen parent to renounce the foreign citizenship they acquired from their non-citizen parent, upon attaining the age of 21 years;
c. The Court held that these provisions violated constitutional rights
d. As a result, Batswana and their children are no longer required to renounce one citizenship in order to retain another.
📌 Dual citizenship is now fully recognised, with legislative processes updated to reflect the court’s rulings.
6. CONCLUSION
6.1 In Botswana, power does not create legality;
6.2 Legality flows only from the Constitution.
🛑a. Has the Department of Civil and National Registration failed or refused to issue you with a national identity card because one of your parents is a foreign national?
🛑 b. Has the Department of Immigration and Citizenship refused to issue you with a passport because one of your parents is a non-citizen?
🛎 If so, such conduct may be contrary to binding court decisions and the Citizenship Act as amended.
I will NOT rest