MOER - free market think tank

MOER - free market think tank We are promoting free-market capitalism for Bangladesh & the world

06/11/2024

Jamaat Shibir are bloodthirsty. Perhaps they decide that being so is okay with Islam, given the rise of the Taliban, ISIS, & su***de bombing.

If this is what they are promoting to receive the CIA's blessing, they will bleed Bangladesh to death.

We cannot live amidst them. Yunus uses them & has himself surrounded by them, but for how long before they violently gobble him?

Bangladesh will only survive as a liberal plural democracy nothing else.

Jamaat Shibir, spell out your democracy & grow as one.

02/11/2024

Awami League is not at all a good learner. Not in 1971, 75, or 2024.

Many want them to repent, seek an apology, or rectify past mistakes, but they, IMO, are too thick-headed.

People may love them, curse them, or oust them - they'll remain unchanged unless we, the people, change.

01/11/2024

Shared:
ঢাকা বিশ্ববিদ্যালয়ে ছাত্রলীগে সিবির এর প্রেসিডেন্ট ১১ লাখ টাকার বিনিময়ে সদস্য। শিবিরে সভাপতি নিজেই স্বীকার করেছে তার দলের টাকা ইনভেস্ট করা হয়েছে। এই একজনের পিছনে জামাত যদি ১১ লাখ টাকা খরছ করে এরকম আরো কত টাকা কত সদস্যের পেছনে খরছ করছে তা আল্লাহই ভাল জানেন। আত্মগোপণ করে হাজারো শিবির ছাত্রলীগে ছিল। তাদের ইনভেস্টমেন্টের ফসল তারা এখন হাতে হাতে পেয়েছে। বুদ্ধির তারিফ করতেই হবে।

এখন ধারণা করা যায় তারা শুধু ছাত্রলীগে নয় ছাত্রদল, যুবদল, বিএনপি, পুলিশ ও আর্মি সবখানেই এবং বিশেষ করে অন্যান্য ইসলামিক দলগুলোর মধ্যে তাদের বিচরণ আরো বেশি। তাদের মাস্টার প্ল্যান ছিল নিখুঁত। ডক্টর ইউনুস আমেরিকাতে গিয়ে এই মাসটার প্লানের ঠিকই প্রশংসা করেছেন।

তাদের কৌশল সি আই এ কে ও হার মানায় ।

US Supreme Court Judgment: Covid vaccines are NOT vaccines.  Robert F. Kennedy Jr.  won his case against all pharmaceuti...
01/11/2024

US Supreme Court Judgment:
Covid vaccines are NOT vaccines. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won his case against all pharmaceutical lobbies.
Covid-19 vaccines are NOT vaccines. In its decision, the Supreme Court confirms that the damage caused by Covid mRNA gene therapies is IRREPARABLE. As the Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, there are no further appeals and all avenues of appeal have been exhausted.
In a statement, Robert F. Kennedy highlighted that this success was only possible thanks to the international cooperation of a large number of lawyers and scientists. It is clear that this decision constitutes an international precedent.
Especially in Switzerland, this ruling should have an impact, because Switzerland has a special position with its federal constitution. On the one hand, the Nuremberg Code is contained in article 118-B of the Constitution and, in Switzerland, the misuse of genetic engineering in humans is prohibited under article 119 of the Federal Constitution. This prohibition is complemented by article 230-A of the Swiss Criminal Code, which means that offenders risk a prison sentence of up to 10 years.
However, this historic judgment should also give pause to the rest of the world, because the Nuremberg Code has international validity and is also contained in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
In the case of criminal charges, the Statement should refer to the Contergan scandal in order to give special weight to the importance of such charges or allegations.
German lawyer Rainer Füllmich and more than 100 other German lawyers are actively involved in these cases. None of the media talks about the issue, neither in Switzerland nor in Europe.
Unfortunately, it is almost mathematical that, in the case of a disruptive issue capable of altering the financial and economic plans of the powerful LOBBIES in the PHARMACEUTICAL sector, public opinion is not informed. We are in the middle of a promotional campaign aimed at encouraging people to get vaccinated and then re-vaccinated in light of the upcoming winter.
It is very likely that, if news of the historic trial does get out, it will do so belatedly, to allow the corrupt medical profession, aligned with the positions of the pharmaceutical lobbies, to make as much progress as possible with the vaccination campaign.

WE, therefore, INVITE all honest people of good will to give maximum publicity to this historic decision of the US Supreme Court, for our own good, but above all for the good of our children and grandchildren.... Let us not let the lobbyists irreparably ruin our health and put our lives in danger.
LET US PROMOTE REBELLION AGAINST THE DIRTY AND UNPUBLISHED BUSINESS OF DEATH.

You can see the news at the following link:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-supreme-court-reinstates-all-employees-fired-being-unvaccinated-orders-backpay

COVID "VACCINES"... are NOT vaccines... PROVEN Serum Institute’s Covid vaccine IS a vaccine. K.

The New York state Supreme Court reinstated all state employees fired for being unvaccinated during the pandemic Monday, saying the government violated their rights.

01/11/2024

In a system where private enterprise is emphasized and the government's role is minimal—without any power to award contracts—the spontaneous and self-regulating nature of the free market can lead to efficient and innovative infrastructure development. Here’s why this approach could be better:

1. Spontaneity of Free Market Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurial Initiative: When left to their own devices, entrepreneurs identify gaps in the market and seize opportunities to create value. For example, if there is a clear need for better roads or bridges, private investors and construction firms will naturally see the opportunity to profit by building and maintaining infrastructure that serves the needs of the population. This spontaneous drive fosters innovation and resourcefulness that government planning often stifles.

Decentralized Decision-Making: In a truly free market, decisions about which projects to invest in are made by numerous independent entrepreneurs and companies, not a central authority. This leads to a more dynamic and responsive infrastructure landscape, as market participants continuously adjust to changes in demand, technology, and economic conditions.

2. Market-Driven Infrastructure Development

Demand-Driven Projects: Instead of government committees deciding which infrastructure projects are priorities, private enterprises build where there is demand. For instance, a private company may construct a hospital in a growing urban area where the population is willing to pay for better healthcare. The motivation to meet demand ensures resources are allocated where they are most needed and valued.

Voluntary Investment: Entrepreneurs invest in projects only when they see a real chance of return. This ensures that only economically viable infrastructure gets built, unlike government projects that may be constructed based on political motivations rather than actual need.

3. Elimination of Government Contract Power

No Room for Cronyism: When governments lack the power to award contracts, there is no risk of favoritism, corruption, or crony capitalism. Instead, every entrepreneur and company must compete fairly in the open market to deliver the best value to consumers. This competition fosters an ecosystem of continuous improvement, as businesses strive to innovate and provide better solutions.

Transparent and Market-Based Pricing: Without government intervention, prices for infrastructure projects are set by supply and demand. The cost of building a bridge or hospital reflects real market conditions, not inflated budgets driven by bureaucratic inefficiencies or favoritism.

4. Incentivizing Innovation and Quality

Profit Motive Drives Excellence: Private companies are incentivized to build durable, high-quality infrastructure because their reputation and financial success depend on it. If a construction firm builds substandard bridges, it will lose clients and revenue. This profit-driven approach naturally aligns with delivering value to the public.

Technological Advancement: Free market entrepreneurship encourages the adoption of cutting-edge technologies. Companies are motivated to experiment with new construction techniques, materials, and designs to gain a competitive edge, leading to advancements that government planning rarely achieves.

5. Case for a Minimal, Facilitative Government

Regulatory Framework Only: The government's limited role would be to ensure property rights, enforce contracts, and maintain rule of law. It would not intervene in economic planning but would provide a stable environment where private businesses can operate freely and securely.

Incentives for Infrastructure Maintenance: In a spontaneous market, private enterprises have a vested interest in the ongoing maintenance of infrastructure. Roads funded by toll systems, for example, must be kept in good condition to ensure continuous revenue. This ongoing care contrasts with government projects, which can suffer from neglect after initial construction.

6. Self-Correcting Mechanisms of the Market

Natural Regulation: If a private project is unsuccessful or unprofitable, market forces will quickly adjust. Failed enterprises either innovate to survive or exit the market, making room for more efficient players. This self-correcting nature ensures that resources are not wasted on unproductive ventures, which is a common issue with large-scale government planning.

Resource Allocation Based on Consumer Choice: Infrastructure that serves genuine needs thrives, while less necessary projects do not. This consumer-driven model ensures that the public’s preferences shape development, leading to more relevant and beneficial infrastructure.

By embracing a system where private enterprise drives development and the government acts merely as a facilitator of a free and fair marketplace, infrastructure can be more adaptive, efficient, and aligned with the actual needs of society. The spontaneous order created by entrepreneurs in a free market brings about natural and sustainable economic growth, free from the distortions and inefficiencies of centralized government planning.

31/10/2024

Say what you will. Petty, envious leaders can try to undermine his legacy, but he inspired us to fight for our freedom—not them.

27/10/2024

"Disclaimer: This is a private page and has no official affiliation with the Awami League. Our purpose is to reflect the aspirations of both the people and the party, advocating for meaningful reforms and positive changes."

27/10/2024

If Canada were to openly support a nation actively seeking the destruction of the United States, Washington’s response would likely be swift and multifaceted. The U.S. has deep diplomatic, economic, and security ties with Canada, so the first step would likely involve intense diplomatic efforts to resolve tensions through discussion, negotiation, and international pressure.

However, if diplomatic measures failed and Canada's actions directly threatened U.S. security, Washington might respond with economic measures, like sanctions, to pressure Canada to change course. The U.S. could also leverage alliances and partnerships within NATO and other international bodies to isolate Canada diplomatically and curtail its support for hostile actors.

In extreme cases, if Canadian actions posed an immediate and significant threat, the U.S. might consider bolstering its northern border security and strengthening its military readiness.

Bangladesh & India are in a similar situation under Yunus, & the future would be no different if Bangladesh did things to tease or agitate India.

22/10/2024

Samsul Alam Salim :

আওয়ামী লীগ সরকার শুধু রাজাকার আর পাকিস্তানের পরাজিত শক্তির কাছেই ফ্যাসিবাদ ছিলো,কিন্তু সাধারণ মানুষ জান মাল নিয়ে খুব সুন্দর ভাবে বসবাস করতে পারতো,দেশে শান্তি ছিলো।নিরাপত্তা ছিলো।দেশের উন্নয়ন ছিলো।
৭১ সালের পরাজিতরাই ২৪ শে স্বাধীন হয়েছে, কিন্তু দেশ চলে গেছে বিশৃঙ্খলার মধ্যে।বর্তমান দেশের পরিস্থিতি দেখে বুঝা যায় কেন আওয়ামী লীগ সরকার জোর করে ক্ষমতায় থাকতে চাইতো,কারন দেশ আওয়ামী লীগ সরকারের কাছেই নিরাপদ।আওয়ামী লীগ সরকার সাধারণ জনতার সরকার,আওয়ামী লীগ সরকার গরিবের সরকার,আওয়ামী লীগ সরকার সকল ধর্মের সরকার। এটাই বাস্তব।

22/10/2024

The Awami League leadership won’t change on its own. Those who genuinely love the party, Bangabandhu, and the country must take the lead.

It's up to us to drive the transformation needed to restore integrity and secure a thriving future. We can't wait for change—we must make it happen.

Awami League doesn't have to be a rogue party but a decent, accommodating, tolerant, & peaceful organisation.

22/10/2024

Yunus can do no Reforms, and neither can Hasina. We can:

For Bangladesh to unlock its full economic potential, it is time to adopt supply-side economics as the national strategy. This approach prioritises empowering businesses and citizens by reducing government interference, especially in tax policies, and allowing the private sector to drive growth. A central pillar of this strategy is ensuring low, stable, and predictable taxes that foster an environment of certainty for investors and entrepreneurs without the arbitrary fluctuations that often characterise government fiscal policies.

A consistent low-tax regime is critical to long-term growth. Rather than offering tax breaks or fluctuating rates, the government should set a fixed, affordable tax rate that encourages businesses to plan for the future confidently. This stability allows companies to make long-term investments in expansion, innovation, and job creation, knowing that they won’t face sudden changes in their financial obligations. A simplified tax system benefits businesses and reduces the government's ability to interfere, ensuring that the private sector has the freedom to drive the economy forward.

By limiting the government’s fiscal power to manipulate tax rates or impose new levies, businesses are encouraged to invest in Bangladesh, as they know they are operating in a fair and transparent environment. This is crucial for attracting domestic and foreign investment, fueling growth in critical manufacturing, agriculture, and technology sectors. Bangladesh’s economic growth should be driven by a private industry that can operate freely without the constant threat of unpredictable tax burdens.

Moreover, low and stable taxes are a crucial driver of job creation. When high taxes do not overburden businesses, they have the capital to expand operations and hire more workers. This means real jobs and sustainable economic empowerment for the Bangladeshi people instead of relying on government handouts or subsidies. A low-tax system fosters entrepreneurship, allowing small businesses to thrive and creating opportunities for millions nationwide. Job creation is not just about employment—it’s about giving people the means to lift themselves out of poverty and into prosperity.

In the global market, Bangladesh must remain competitive. High taxes and excessive regulations hinder our ability to compete on price and quality. By adopting a low-tax regime, the government will lower production costs, enabling Bangladeshi companies to offer more competitive prices and capture a larger share of international markets. This is essential for sustaining and growing our export-driven economy, especially in vital industries like textiles and garments.

Supply-side economics also limits the scope for government overreach. A simplified, low-tax system reduces the opportunities for corruption and favouritism, where selective tax breaks are given to politically connected businesses. By keeping taxes stable and low for everyone, the government minimises its ability to manipulate the economy in favour of special interests. This creates a level playing field for all businesses, ensuring that growth is driven by innovation and market forces, not by government intervention.

When taxes are kept low and stable, businesses have more resources to reinvest in innovation and productivity improvements. This encourages companies to adopt new technologies, improve processes, and invest in research and development. The result is more competitive industries and the diversification of Bangladesh’s economy into higher-value sectors, such as information technology and pharmaceuticals. A stable tax regime gives businesses the confidence to invest long-term in these future-oriented industries.

Ultimately, supply-side economics offers Bangladesh a path to sustainable growth. It empowers the private sector by creating an environment of low, predictable taxes and minimal government interference. By allowing businesses to thrive, we ensure that job creation, innovation, and competitiveness are at the heart of our economic strategy. This approach builds a strong foundation for Bangladesh’s future, where growth is driven by the market, not by government manipulation. Supply-side economics will enable Bangladesh to achieve long-term prosperity, create a wealth of opportunities for its people, and solidify its position as a rising economic power on the global stage.

Of course, the monetary monopoly that leads to hyperinflation & crony loot of the system will be replaced by a multiple-competitive currency system as in the international economic order. We have to ignore IMF or WB advice. Big banks may not be our friends, but many will be.

Address

Dhaka

Telephone

+447950801768

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when MOER - free market think tank posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to MOER - free market think tank:

Share