14/06/2026
This Tuesday, the WPA and its consultants ADW Johnson want the Regional Planning Panel to provide a further deferral on the seawall DAs - yet another extension.
The seawall DAs have been assessed for over 18 months, with all Assessment Reports recommending REFUSAL.
The WPA had years to sort their DAs out. They still do not have owner consent for many properties. Their proposed wall is Swiss cheese!
The community has had enough. It is over. Time to move on. Do you agree?
The WPA believes the longer they can draw out the DAs, the more they can hold the government out to ransom, saying if you don't give us this, then you have to give us something else. The truth is that NSW Government owes the WPA nothing.
SOS will be making it very clear to the Panel this Tuesday that our community is traumatised by the continuing threat of the seawall. We will insist that refusal needs to be final on Tuesday. We need local peace of mind restored. The beachfront landowners might have stepped up for beach risk, but the wider community did not.
The WPA is over-reaching, wishfully thinking NSW Government will give Council five lots of beachfront land for the lots to be walled, NSW Government, including Premier Minns, refused the seawall DAs and would be loathe to sell out the local community.
Also, ADW Johnson conveniently fails to mention in their submissions that NSW Governement formally OBJECTED to the three WPA seawall DAs. Even Council's assessment report recommends DA refusal. NSW Government and Council are the most significant landowners on the beachfront and they are not on board. We recall Premier Minns told us so.
The WPA might win over some beachfront landowners with wishful thinking and false hopes, but they have not won over all landowners, and the WPA will not win over the Regional Planning Panel with 'maybes' and 'what ifs' based on future government decisions on s.68 and the CMP.
The Panel must reject the DAs,. The proposal before the Panel is unsupportable.
ADW Johnson now cites the possibility of sand nourishment in their submission, but their DA specifically excludes offshore sand nourishment. The WPA seawall is not fit for purpose. It was designed without the consideration of offshore sand nourishment. The world has moved on. The Panel should move on too.
The DA process cannot be misued by the WPA as bargaining chip for other seawall pathways. The horse has run its race. It lost. There is no provision for these failed seawall DAs to leverage or rely upon a s.68 or other hard wall pathways.
Minns said no. The Assessment reports said no. Several beachfront landowners say no. The community says no. The Planning Panel has the support of the community to say "sorry but no" this Tuesday.
Central Coast Council ABC Central Coast Coast Community News Central Coast Council Watch Friends of Terrigal Haven Gosford Politics In The Pub