Odtojan Bryl Justice Project

Odtojan Bryl Justice Project No breaches of law, conduct or ethics. .

OBJP arose from the injustice inflicted on NSW Lawyers Marie Odtojan, Artem Bryl & their law firm where the NSW Law Society unlawfully stripped their rights to practise law, without due process.

Via Odtojan Bryl Lawyers   ⚔️⚖️ A Clash of TitansJudge v DPPA long-running heated feud.A Director of Public Prosecutions...
16/07/2026

Via Odtojan Bryl Lawyers
⚔️⚖️ A Clash of Titans
Judge v DPP
A long-running heated feud.
A Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under scrutiny.
A parliamentary inquiry that made findings.

The Attorney General aggressively criticised the inquiry and outright dismissed it as "a stitch-up from the outset", describing its findings as "unsupported by evidence" and labelling the report "farcical". He accused a seven-member parliamentary committee, comprising representatives of different political parties, of treating "mere suspicion and speculation as fact".

The legal establishment closed ranks.
The AG.
The Law Society.
The Bar Association.
Senior legal figures.
Crown Prosecutors.
All rallied to defend one of their own.

The contradiction is difficult to ignore.

Faced with scrutiny and findings, DPP Sally Dowling received unified institutional protection.

But when mere allegations of "prior misconduct" were made against two lawyers by the Attorney General's office, those allegations were relied upon as though they had been established through lawful findings, despite no such findings ever existing.

Two lawyers lost their practising rights.
Their law firm.
Their livelihood.
No lawful finding.

When scrutiny was directed at one of their own, following a parliamentary process involving submissions, evidence, witnesses, admissions, and findings, the AG and legal establishment doubled down, invoking reputation, status, titles, and opinion in her defence.

An appeal to authority.

One standard for the inner circle.

Another for those outside their circle who expose them to scrutiny.

If this is how institutions protect one of their own despite findings, imagine the protection afforded when two lawyers report people and institutions within that same circle.

Retaliation.
Loss of livelihood.
Silence.

⚖️ Titles are not evidence. Reputation is not evidence. Findings matter. Accountability must apply equally to all.

📖 Read the article: https://wix.to/GgBVb4U

👉 Sign the petition: Call for NSW Attorney General Michael Daley and MP Hugh McDermott to resign and call for investigation in his office with MP Hugh McDermott https://www.change.org/p/call-for-nsw-attorney-general-daley-mp-mcdermott-to-resign-for-condoning-unlawful-acts

👉 Support our cause. https://gofund.me/b32c3d4c

NSW Attorney General Michael Daley undermining parliamentary findings against the NSW DPP as a "stitch up", "unsupported by evidence"and "farcical" while his office introduced prior misconduct allegations against two NSW lawyers where no findings existed.

  The Odtojan Mirror Test - Rule of Law.
01/06/2026

The Odtojan Mirror Test - Rule of Law.

The Most Honest Test Anyone can Apply "Take the process applied to two lawyers. Turn it around. Apply it to the people who applied it. Ask: would that be acceptable? This is the mirror test, and the reflection is revealing. There is a test that can cut through every legal argument, every procedural....

  "The selective application of the law is not justice. It is the weaponisation of justice against the very people it wa...
31/05/2026

"The selective application of the law is not justice. It is the weaponisation of justice against the very people it was built to protect." - Marie Odtojan.

One Year On. No Findings. No Adjudication. Just Allegations, and a Judgment That Made It Precedent for Every Australian Lawyer. Marie Odtojan and Artem Bryl - Odtojan Bryl Lawyers. Two lawyers. A Law Firm. No findings. No proven case of any breaches under the law. No adjudication. Still speaking. St...

The landmark Federal Court ruling in the controversial case of Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd raises an important que...
20/05/2026

The landmark Federal Court ruling in the controversial case of Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd raises an important question:

Has the legal definition of what constitutes a female become so broad that it may unintentionally undermine the very s*x-based protections the law was originally designed to recognise and protect?

This is a significant issue that warrants greater public discussion and thoughtful conversation about rights, safeguards, boundaries, and the practical consequences of legislative definitions.

When Language, Law, and Identity Collide: The Federal Court decision in Tickle v Giggle Case, Statutory Definitions, Government Intervention, and the Debate Over Women’s Spaces. On 15 May 2026, the Federal Court made its landmark decision in the case of Tickle v Giggle for Girls Pty Ltd (No 2) [20...

When a NSW Supreme Court Judge Is Sued, It Highlights a Fundamental Principle: No One Is Above the Law
08/05/2026

When a NSW Supreme Court Judge Is Sued, It Highlights a Fundamental Principle: No One Is Above the Law

A NSW Supreme Court judge being sued reinforces a core legal principle: no one is above the law. This articles explores what that means for judicial accountability and public trust, and the integrity of the justice system, and why those issues matter to society as a whole.
Read more: https://wix.to/1dzCMw0

Titles must never sit above the law.Keep speaking up. Keep making records. Facts and evidence can be buried for a moment...
19/02/2026

Titles must never sit above the law.
Keep speaking up. Keep making records. Facts and evidence can be buried for a moment, but never forever.

: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office.

It’s the first time the former prince, who is accused of a number of allegations over his links to convicted s*x offender Jeffrey Epstein, has been arrested.

More details to come.

09/02/2026

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
- George Orwell, Animal Farm

Justice delayed, obscured, or applied selectively is justice denied.

09/02/2026

NSW Supreme Court Judicial Review Update. Odtojan and Bryl Two Australian lawyers and their law firm rendered “unfit” without any disciplinary proceedings, without NCAT determination, and without an independent decision-maker. Allegations and conduct issues were raised and determined by the same...

  An update in Dec 2025 after the court hearings in November 2025.
03/02/2026

An update in Dec 2025 after the court hearings in November 2025.

My lived experience with NSW Law Society. brief update - Sunday, 31 November, as we get some R&R on the weekend and debrief.C...

  An update posted in Dec 2025 after the court hearings on 26 and 27 November 2026.
03/02/2026

An update posted in Dec 2025 after the court hearings on 26 and 27 November 2026.

75 likes, 9 comments. “ My lived experience with NSW Law Society. This is my story. A brief update, Sunday, 31 November, as we get some R&R on the weekend and debrief. Currently, judgment from our judicial review hearings (26–27 November) is reserved. In this video, we speak...

Address

Sydney, NSW

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Odtojan Bryl Justice Project posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Odtojan Bryl Justice Project:

Shortcuts

Share