17/10/2026
BOM Scandal - "A forensic audit has found copied and pasted temperature readings, statistically impossible data sequences and 110 years of one-way warming adjustments." is the opening lines from an article in The Australian by environmental editor, Graham Lloyd.
Jo Nova takes the story up in her blog - "Everyone knows the BOM publishes adjusted formally “corrected” datasets, and we have debated the many versions of ACORN adjustments and homogenization many times, but if the guardians of the raw data are presenting mistaken or altered data as though it was the original recordings, that crosses a new line. Significantly these strange duplications were not corrected in any version of the expert corrections. They were spread across the whole country, and many were even in the modern era, not just among the old digitized records copied from handwritten notes.
As the two auditors say: “None of these findings require any knowledge of climate science – they are purely data integrity failures that would disqualify any dataset in any other field of science.”
This error prone data is being fed into climate models that farmers (used to) rely on, and town planners, health officials and insurers are trying to use. We’re betting the economy and transforming our energy grid on this data. We’ll spend a trillion dollars killing off coal but we won’t audit the original data? "
After all the high minded purity of BOM claims that they provide all their raw unadjusted data to critics, an audit by Geoff Sherrington and Tom Berger has found that “almost all CDO* data sets that we have studied, about 150 stations, show some past adjustments.” In one case 82 years of daily d...