Jewish Issues Watchdog

01/06/2026

…The Kristof article claimed to report widespread sexual violence by Israeli prison guards against Palestinian prisoners, including the allegation that Israeli prison guards trained dogs to commit r**e.

…“The NYT said their biggest asset is trust. You can’t tell shareholders [that] credibility is your core asset and then hide records about your processes. We are just asking the board whether it did its job…”

…“Publishing that Israeli soldiers laughed while a dog r**ed a prisoner is not reporting on prison conditions. It is a factual claim that either happened or did not. If the Times has the evidence, production will vindicate them. If they do not, that is the story…”

…“The Times printed that Israeli soldiers summoned a dog, encouraged it in Hebrew, and used it to r**e a bound prisoner while their colleagues took pictures. They called it corroborated. They called it fact-checked. So show us the facts. Produce the date, the location, the unit, the handler, the photographs, the medical records, the witnesses. All of it. Because if it exists, producing it ends this. And if it does not exist, then The New York Times published one of the vilest accusations ever leveled at a soldier, with nothing behind it, and called that reporting…”

This includes the design and operation of legal review programs, source verification programs, and corrections procedures, among others.

29/05/2026

How does violence against Jews become possible?

At the Royal Commission this week, ASIO Director-General Mike Burgess gave a chilling answer: it becomes possible when it goes unchecked and is therefore normalised. Society gradually gives it permission.

And once violence against the Jewish community becomes socially permissible, the question is no longer how we got here.

It’s whether Australia has the courage to reverse it.

Video: AIJAC.

28/05/2026

The “Settler Violence” Libel:

A 125-page analysis of the UN OCHA (Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) database on incidents in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, which is the primary source cited by media, NGOs (like B’Tselem, Yesh Din), and international bodies for claims of widespread “settler violence" found that: only 3.8% of the total OCHA-reported incidents of "settler violence" (9 per month) are clear cases of alleged civilian-on-civilian harm (bodily injury or property damage attributed to Jewish Israelis); AND that most of those cases were of Jewish Israelis responding to Arab attacks, stone-throwing, riots, or attempts to damage property/enter communities.

In other words about 2-3 incidents per month are actually violence initiated by Jewish Israelis; while IDF/Shin Bet data documents thousands of violent Arab incidents monthly against Jews.

The report demonstrates that the “settler violence” label often refers to defensive actions (or even security force actions) as unprovoked aggression by civilians.

This "settler violence" label fuels a “blood libel” to delegitimize settlements, pressure Israel internationally, and ignore the much higher volume of Palestinian terrorist attacks.

In detail:
• Data examined: OCHA’s list of 8,332 “incidents involving Israeli settlers and other Israeli civilians” from Jan 2016 to April 2023 (pre-Oct 7 period). Of these, 6,285 were categorized as against Palestinians.
• Filtering results:
• ~2,047 (~24%) involved settlers as victims of Palestinian violence (still counted under “settler-related”).
• Many others occurred in Jerusalem (not “settlements”), involved Temple Mount visits/clashes with security forces and rioters, state infrastructure work in Area C, hiking/tourism, or non-violent events.
• Palestinian terrorists killed/wounded during attacks on Jews, or incidents with IDF/security forces (no civilian settlers involved), were often labeled “settler violence.”
• After exclusions, only ~833 incidents (~10% of the original) remained as potential cases involving Jewish civilians causing bodily harm/property damage over 7.5 years — averaging ~9 per month.
Of those remaining 10% of cases:
48% are listed simply as “involvement in clashes” — with no details on who initiated, who was the aggressor, or fault. These are ambiguous two-sided events.
• 14% explicitly involved clashes with Israeli security forces (IDF/police), meaning they were not purely civilian settler actions but confrontations during counter terrorism operations or responses.
This leaves 3.8% of the total OCHA-reported incidents of "settler violence" as clear cases of alleged civilian-on-civilian harm (bodily injury or property damage attributed to Jewish Israelis).
The report concludes that the “settler violence” label often refers to defensive actions (or even security force actions) as unprovoked aggression by civilians.

25/05/2026

Mr. President, finish the job in Iran and free the world from this hideous regime. …Now is the time to finish them off, end their control of the Strait of Hormuz, and end their support of global terrorism.
…So far the ayatollahs have kept no promises, made no meaningful peace offers, and thumbed their noses at America and at you. It is time to finish the job, get full control of the strait, and seek peace from a position of maximum strength.

It is time to finish the job in Iran and seek peace from a position of maximum strength.

25/05/2026

WSJ reports that a prospective US- Iran agreement in principle involves Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the US ending its shipping blockade.

However, giving the Iranian dictators ANYTHING for opening the Strait implies that they have the right to control the Strait.

DON’T DO IT!

A senior administration official said the agreement in principle would see the U.S. lift its blockade in exchange for Iran reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

21/05/2026

Trump in 2018: “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools.”

Yet, in the war with Iran, Pakistan has emerged as the principal US-Iran mediator.

However, the American Enterprise Institute describes the choice of Pakistan as “an own goal by the Trump administration” because Pakistan “is clearly on Team Iran.”

Last week, multiple Iranian aircraft were parked on a Pakistani airfield, including an Iranian air force RC-130, a reconnaissance and intelligence-gathering aircraft. Pakistan might have been shielding valuable Iranian air assets from possible strikes by the U.S. and Israel.

“I don’t trust Pakistan as far as I can throw them,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) said at a Senate hearing. “If they actually do have Iranian aircraft parked in Pakistan bases to protect Iranian military assets, that tells me we should be looking maybe for somebody else to mediate.”

Considering America’s experience with Pakistan in Afghanistan, no one should be surprised that Islamabad doesn’t exactly evoke trust in Washington.

We learned in the 2000s that Islamabad’s interests are in many ways the direct opposite of America’s.

21/05/2026

From WSJ, by Dov Lieberman:

Israel launched a highly technical campaign to kill or capture all participants in the Oct. 7 attack, compiling a list of thousands of names.

Israeli intelligence uses facial recognition, intercepted calls, and location data to identify and track targets across Gaza, Lebanon and Iran.

The campaign continues despite a cease-fire, with recent strikes killing Hamas military commander Ezzedin al-Haddad.

One by one, militants who videotaped their exploits that day have been identified and killed, in a measure of Israel’s surveillance acumen and desire for retribution.